Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 111 of 111
  1. #101
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    I don't think many illegals will be operating SAM sites along the border or be carry stingers with them. They can be seen from the ground as has been stated. But I'm going to rest on this topic because Dan is painted deep into a corner and there is no further point of discussing this.
    What deep corner? You have yet to prove that these Predators will have any effect on illegal immigration or curtailing drug mules. So far the only thing you've debated for is that these planes have the right to trample all over individual's property rights. Congratulations, that's something to be very proud of.

  2. #102
    See you when it burns SWC Bonfire's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,966
    As opposed to the individual's property rights under a socialist system?

    Nbadan, you are only opposed to whatever Bush or the Republicans do. If a Democrat did the EXACT SAME THING you would praise him for focusing on the homefront and not in the illegal war in Iraq.

  3. #103
    I love J.T. smeagol's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Post Count
    11,756
    Nbadan, you are only opposed to whatever Bush or the Republicans do. If a Democrat did the EXACT SAME THING you would praise him for focusing on the homefront and not in the illegal war in Iraq.
    This is exactly what I meant when i started that other thread "Partisan".

  4. #104
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    As opposed to the individual's property rights under a socialist system?

    Nbadan, you are only opposed to whatever Bush or the Republicans do. If a Democrat did the EXACT SAME THING you would praise him for focusing on the homefront and not in the illegal war in Iraq.
    No, I would be against this if it was a Clinton Administration idea.

    I just don't see any safeguards here. What will these Predators be used for? What kind of oversight will they have? Who will have access to the images coming from the cameras? Can and will these Predators be armed? How are these Predators more effective than the thousands of sensors already laid out along the border? Will they be working in conjunction with the border patrol and the US Coast Guard and under their operational guidelines or will they be operating independently under a separate set of standards?

    It doesn't seem that any of these questions have been contemplated much less asked by our elected representatives.
    Last edited by Nbadan; 08-25-2005 at 05:22 PM.

  5. #105
    JEBO TE! Clandestino's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    5,649
    what harm would they do nbadan? if you doing illegal along the border hopefully they will catch it...

    some states have planes that already monitor traffic and like that.

  6. #106
    JEBO TE! Clandestino's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    5,649
    and manny, these uavs are not only seen from the ground, but they can be heard too.

  7. #107
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    and manny, these uavs are not only seen from the ground, but they can be heard too.
    Didn't even think about that but it makes sense. A turboprop is noisy as .

  8. #108
    SW: Hot As Hell
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    7,069
    Dan thinks his property rights mean planes can't fly over his house. No wonder he will never understand jack in this forum.

  9. #109
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Just days ago the England equivalent to Homeland Security put out new proposed guidelines that would make anyone who runs a web-site or post negative comments about the Blair government eligible for deportation.
    If by negative comments you mean posting comments that all British non-Muslims should be summarily executed in order to establish a Muslim state, well I guess you have Blair busted

    So far the only thing you've debated for is that these planes have the right to trample all over individual's property rights. Congratulations, that's something to be very proud of.
    Property rights? What about the right of all the property owners along the border not to have illegal immigrants and drug dealers trashing their properties, breaking into their homes, stealing their possessions, etc?

    Oh wait, they deserve it because they're white and racist, right?

  10. #110
    JEBO TE! Clandestino's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    5,649
    i'd love to see what dan does when a plane flies over his house...errr bunker...

  11. #111
    See you when it burns SWC Bonfire's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,966
    No, I would be against this if it was a Clinton Administration idea.

    I just don't see any safeguards here. What will these Predators be used for? What kind of oversight will they have? Who will have access to the images coming from the cameras? Can and will these Predators be armed? How are these Predators more effective than the thousands of sensors already laid out along the border? Will they be working in conjunction with the border patrol and the US Coast Guard and under their operational guidelines or will they be operating independently under a separate set of standards?

    It doesn't seem that any of these questions have been contemplated much less asked by our elected representatives.
    Well, Nbadan, I hope that you would ask for the same amount of oversight on funds derived by a restributive socialist system. But you know the track record of elected officials and money in the coffers. Would you trust these same people to distribute the funds fairly?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •