Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 109 of 109
  1. #101
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    27,659
    I do appreciate his honesty. Just not his TOSB status. I love how people want to act like players should take less to win... when this dude is flat out telling you is all that matter is the dough ...and he was the poster boy for unselfishness on the court.
    I don't blame Nash at all for saying what he said. He's right; 99% in the same position would do the same thing.

    Still.... Lakers

  2. #102
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    153,473
    Really, really bad call not to use the stretch provision on him...

  3. #103
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    14,367
    Really, really bad call not to use the stretch provision on him...
    Not really. Lack of cap space wasn't the reason that they didn't get any of their FA targets. Using the stretch provision on Nash would have created 6M in cap space they didn't need last summer and cost them 3M in cap space in each of the next two summers. They made the right call by eating the entire cap hit last summer.

  4. #104
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    153,473
    Not really. Lack of cap space wasn't the reason that they didn't get any of their FA targets. Using the stretch provision on Nash would have created 6M in cap space they didn't need last summer and cost them 3M in cap space in each of the next two summers. They made the right call by eating the entire cap hit last summer.
    But now, even with a disabled player exception, they can't make as much room. There's trades to be made mid-season, or players to pick up off waivers.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure how that would've affected Nash's cap hold for next season (which is sizeable at almost $15 million).

  5. #105
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    14,367
    But now, even with a disabled player exception, they can't make as much room. There's trades to be made mid-season, or players to pick up off waivers.

    On the other hand, I'm not sure how that would've affected Nash's cap hold for next season (which is sizeable at almost $15 million).
    The DPE will be half his salary, IIRC. That's almost as much as they would have gotten with the stretch provision, with no impact on future years.

    I don't think the cap hold for next year was ever an issue as Nash was never going to be in their plans beyond this season.

  6. #106
    moral victory, tbh. Franklin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    4,059
    At least when Scott gets sacked they wouldn't be looking for a coach, just give Nash the job and he'd do just as good as Kidd imho.

  7. #107
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Post Count
    38,236
    The injury exception is only 4.85 million for Nash

  8. #108
    Veteran LkrFan's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    40,807
    The injury exception is only 4.85 million for Nash
    Time to update your sig son.

  9. #109
    Purple and Bold! whitemamba's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    9,962
    Spur fans going ape over anytihng lakers related, even when its beneficial

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •