Reply With Quote
It's amazing to think you're still worrying about a ing speeding ticket.
Meet here:
Have a circle jerk while logged onto ST.
It's amazing to think you're still worrying about a ing speeding ticket.
Yes, it's a contract. Are you disputing it's not? Also, I wasn't telling him not to sign the ticket, but how to sign the ticket. Did you even read my post?
the advice you've been given that you asked for is to not combat the ticket.
Sorry you don't like it but there's no secret way to beat it. It's not like getting out of jury duty.
Or you could just not have asked for advice on an open messageboard.
Last edited by Blake; 01-06-2015 at 02:07 PM.
Neh, simply skimmed your post.........Now that I fully read it, it's even funnier.
and no, a speeding ticket is not a contract. Lolololololol....
.....lllololoollllllollool
this isn't really true.
There are several ways to "beat it" or get out of it. I've already mentioned the most sure fire (but time consuming process).
But you can either beat it either 1) de facto, 2) procedurally, 3) adjudicating the prosecution, 4) evedencia corpus
but yeah...too much time and effort IMO. Also, you wouldn't ever want to show up again in front of that judge for more serious offenses.
Right, you're a dumbass. Carry on then.
and how would you define this messageboard?
No, it's really true there's no "secret" way to beat a ticket.
Which of those four would you use in this case, counselor?There are several ways to "beat it" or get out of it. I've already mentioned the most sure fire (but time consuming process).
But you can either beat it either 1) de facto, 2) procedurally, 3) adjudicating the prosecution, 4) evedencia corpus
but yeah...too much time and effort IMO. Also, you wouldn't ever want to show up again in front of that judge for more serious offenses.
Walk us through it step by step if you would.
the gates of
I already went through the procedure several posts ago. Pretty much step by step.
an open sub forum of a basketball forum
"but but someone emailed me that a former judge said it's a contract
it might be a contract in the loosest old world legal sense but a speeding ticket doesn't fall under contract law.
But please try claiming to the judge that you don't consent to the contract and let me know how it goes for you.
Your way to beat the ticket was to do defensive driving. OP wants completely off the hook.
Thread of the month candidate...
I agree... typical thread you should take your loss and move on but pride makes you keep going
Did you even read my advice?
You sign up for the course. When you go to adjudicate the prosecution, you bring proof of enrollment with you. You go through the hearing and in the end, if successful, you beat the case. And you don't have to actually take the course. It's just backup.
The odds that the prosecutor is that stupid are astronomically low.
They aren't going to have the ing DA in there. For traffic violations, it's probably just going to be handed over to a clerk or legal assistant. And really, it doesn't have anything to do with relying on the stupidity of the prosecutor. Although, you sure would not want to try to show up one of the main prosecutors in traffic court.
I've already agreed that it's way simpler and easier to just deal with the ticket. But as per the OP question, I did provide stout legal advice that would give him the best chance of beating the case without having to pay an attorney.
the court is gonna wanna see the certificate of completion, not just proof of enrollment.
I don't know anyone anywhere that's slid that by and got away with it. Do you?
Just pay the ing ticket and save yourself the headache.
OMG, you're slow. You're not trying to con the judge or prosecutor with the proof of enrollment. But to go through the procedure that I outlined, you HAVE to enroll. It's just bull red tape that has to be done. Once you beat the case and it's dismissed, you don't have to take the course.
That's not an actual way to beat the ticket. You're just talking about insurance in case you don't beat it.
and it's not good insurance either. Nobody asks for proof of enrollment. Only proof of completion.
Your plan sucks, tbh.
No...if you go through the process to beat the case as I laid out, the court requires proof of enrollment. If you plead "no contest", and then declare deferred adjudication and request for hearing, you will have to have proof of enrollment before they will set the case. Your goal is still to try to beat the case at the hearing.
No, the court doesn't ever require proof of enrollment.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
