https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth
hasn't evolved in 400 million years
right, you see invisible sky daddeh
We haven't seen one fossil showing a transitoinal phase of one creature starting to become something else, none! For us all to have a common ancestor we'd see tons of those kinds of fossils, yet,......none!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
more like Transfictional fossils
The next step is made up replicas....they're desperate for validation and will do just about anything...
since evolution is constant, every fossil is a transitional fossil.
But if you want examples of classic "transitional fossils" or discovered "missing links" there are many many examples. The archaeopteryx is a classic examples. For a hominid, which im sure is what you wanted, we have those too. An example being australopithecus afarensis
Evolution explanation summed up in basically 2 mins...
Hmmmmm?
The fossil record reflects the original diversity of life, not an evolving tree of increasing complexity. There are many examples of "living fossils," where the species is alive today and found deep in the fossil record as well.
According to evolution models for the fossil record, there are three predictions:
1. wholesale change of organisms through time
2. primitive organisms gave rise to complex organisms
3. gradual derivation of new organisms produced transitional forms.
However, these predictions are not borne out by the data from the fossil record.
Trilobites, for instance, appear suddenly in the fossil record without any transitions. There are no fossils between simple single-cell organisms, such as bacteria, and complex invertebrates, such as trilobites.
Extinct trilobites had as much organized complexity as any of today’s invertebrates. In addition to trilobites, billions of other fossils have been found that suddenly appear, fully formed, such as clams, snails, sponges, and jellyfish. Over 300 different body plans are found without any fossil transitions between them and single-cell organisms.
Fish have no ancestors or transitional forms to show how invertebrates, with their skeletons on the outside, became vertebrates with their skeletons inside.
Fossils of a wide variety of flying and crawling insects appear without any transitions. Dragonflies, for example, appear suddenly in the fossil record. The highly complex systems that enable the dragonfly's aerodynamic abilities have no ancestors in the fossil record.
*******In the entire fossil record, there is not a single unequivocal transition form proving a causal relationship between any two species*************** From the billions of fossils we have discovered, there should be thousands of clear examples if they existed.
The lack of transitions between species in the fossil record is what would be expected if life was created.
You didn't even look.
so lazy.
you didn't look either.
So lazy.
It was able to survive in that form for that long, so that particular genome was fine as is.
The simplest concepts escape you.
can you tell me the author of that piece, his credentials, and why i should believe anything he says?
is this a transitional creature?
that is your ancestor
not really. those fish were alive recently.
they were born after i was tbh... its impossible for them to be my ancestors
but they pretty much look like the ones that lived "millions" of years ago. the one that turned into ratsthey were born after i was tbh... its impossible for them to be my ancestors
how do you know what those looked like?but they pretty much look like the ones that lived "millions" of years ago. the one that turned into rats
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
