If this was this guy's first couple of hunts that might be plausible, but he is a pretty experienced hunter all over the world. It seems a lot more plausible that he said the rules like he did in his previous poaching case.
he's a dentist because he didnt get into med school
If this was this guy's first couple of hunts that might be plausible, but he is a pretty experienced hunter all over the world. It seems a lot more plausible that he said the rules like he did in his previous poaching case.
paying $55k doesnt give him the right to kill that animal. He was either stupid, gullible, ignorant to believe so or he was a poacher. None of those should be a good reason for this supposed big game trophy hunter. Imagine that happening here in the US--holy lol
I don't know what the big fuss is over a cat.....Evolution or God will just make another one in the next big bang or your give your household cat a few million years to evolve into one. There! Happy????
Buuuuurn!!! The only doctorate degrees that matter are in medicine, amirite???!!!!!!!!!
Or you could just answer the question. So how much are you planning on donating to conservation efforts in Africa this year?
Selective outrage
http://freakonomics.com/2014/04/24/w...radio-podcast/
you moved the goalposts.
Impoverished =/= conservation efforts
And you'll have to show the numbers in your original question to be true before I can answer it.
For s sake
how much are you going to donate this year to impoverished African villages?
how much are you going to donate to African conservation efforts?
Directly, I have no idea this year.
Now for sake, provide the dollar amount that the impoverished receive from these permits.
Why are fallacies like "moving the goalposts" so hard for you to understand? It's really a pretty easy concept to master.
So, $0.
Directly yeah, $0.
How much has the "impoverished" received from these permits? It's $0 until shown otherwise.
you have the same problem with logical fallacies, tbh.
My original question was My original statement was So asking me to show the numbers in my original question makes no sense because I asked you the first question.
Here is just an example of what the "impoverished" received from just one of these permits.
https://firstforhunters.wordpress.co...kendall-jones/
"Yes, in that video I had hunted an elephant. That one hunt fed more than 100 families. If more people hunted and gave away meat like I did, hundreds or even thousands of people in Africa could be fed as a byproduct of hunting."
And since you have admitted you've given $0...my original statement of helped more impoverished people in one day's paid game permit than you'll sniff in your entire lifetime. shrug was 100% dead on.
it's me telling you to back your claim or stfu.
damn it's not that hard to understand this![]()
one elephant from that one permit fed over 100 families>your $0
damn it's not that hard to understand this![]()
Apparently it's hard for you to clearly put your thoughts into words. Or you're scrambling after you got called out.
You said "one day's paid permit". That implies $$$.
There's no mention in your post of donated meat. No guarantees of a kill either even with a permit, right?
Next time clarify.
My exact quote
"Helped" does not imply $$$. And permits aren't free so of course I said paid permit.Helped more impoverished people in one day's paid game permit than you'll sniff in your entire lifetime. shrug
Just move on and admit you don't do jack for impoverished villages while these trophy hunters actually do.
sure.
How many villagers did Cecil feed?
Cecil wasn't killed with a legal permit goal post mover. But they may have fed him to the villagers anyways and if so still more than your big fat $0
Looks like most people on here are saying animal lives > black African lives
cool
lol since when did you start giving a about African s' lives?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)