Reply With Quote
people noticed, tbh:
Nope. Just reminding Spurs fans the real reason the Spurs lost in the ing 1st round.
people noticed, tbh:
people noticed, tbh:
My bad.
He ain't got any max contract anytime soon, though.
Jesus, are you serious?
Post 1- YOU cite ty stat as the foundation of your argument
Post 2- You write a paragraph on the flaws and unreliability of stats(much better stats than the one you cited, too)
You're ing arguing against your own point in the same thread, and then throw out a cop-out like "stats aren't perfect"..smh..
Hoops Czar: Stats are flawed, can't be perfect
Solution? Bring up a ty stat as the foundation of my argument
Hoops Czar logic: Well, girls aren't perfect, so I'm going to this 5/10 chick rather than the 8/10 chick, because what's the difference? They all have flaws!
Stick to your cliches and antiquated sportstalk radio arguments, tbh..
Last edited by HarlemHeat37; 09-30-2015 at 10:19 PM.
Let me see if I get this straight. You threw the SAME supposedly useless, flawed statistic at me in argument back in late December to show how ty Parker has been when he was on/off the court and now I use the SAME stat to show you how ty Kawhi was in the postseason and I get "No, no, no, you can't do that." "what a ty stat." Is their a double standard here that I'm not aware of or is your brain set to fried?Jesus, are you serious?
Post 1- YOU cite ty stat as the foundation of your argument
Post 2- You write a paragraph on the flaws and unreliability of stats(much better stats than the one you cited, too)
You're ing arguing against your own point in the same thread
Stick to your cliches and antiquated sportstalk radio arguments, tbh..
I gave you adjusted on/off metrics(along with RAPM numbers, too) with a sample size of an entire season + playoffs of 2013-2014
I would never use unadjusted on/off or offensive rating or defensive rating for my argument..
Awesome! You and some dude on Twitter.Nope. Just reminding Spurs fans the real reason the Spurs lost in the ing 1st round.
I'll take my chances with how the Spurs FO and other NBA professionals see reality.
Thanks for playing.
Yeah, they did notice his championship, Finals MVP and DPOY.people noticed, tbh:
No, you gave me the same on/off numbers for Parker for the first 1.5 months of the 2014-2015 season that I gave you for Kawhi. You're referring to a different conversation when you went off on a tangent, telling anybody who'd listen how bad Parker's been over the last two years. Had Kiwi made two more shots in game 7 vs the Clippers, you're so-called prediction would have been wrong and we wouldn't be talking about a SSS. Most people have already owned up to the fact that Leonard had a bad series. You need to stop beating yourself up over the truth. There isn't a stat in existence (that doesn't require severe manipulation) that would show Kawhi being halfway decent in the series vs the Clippers. He was awful defensively and he was garbage offensively with the series hanging in the balance. It pains me to say these nasty, nasty thingsI gave you adjusted on/off metrics(along with RAPM numbers, too) with a sample size of an entire season + playoffs of 2013-2014about such a truly great "once in a generation" player but, it was HIS team and he needs to bear the responsibility for failing to show up when the Spurs needed him most.
Damn, KBL going in without the lube.
Suely, there's video proof of this Matt Barnes ownage?
I've seen the highlight reel of Barnes' dunk and the block at the end of game 7 (when play was already known). So, if you guys have other video, please post.
Why should the league watch out for a Kawhi stopper?in league better watch out for Bruce Barnes 3.0, tbh. Notorious Kawhi stopper.
He averages 12ppg for his career....
So why are ya'll acting like he led the league in scoring and Matt Barnes shut him down?Why should the league watch out for a Kawhi stopper?
He averages 12ppg for his career....
Why don't you post the stats for your hate level when Kawhi has his up your mom's ass vs. down her throat?
Why did the Spurs lose to the clippers? http://www.poundingtherock.com/2015/...-series-review
2 - Who was the team's MVP?
Erler: Duncan, no question. There isn't even a close second.
Passos: Tim Duncan. He was a rock at both ends all series long. An early playoff exit won't make people forget the sight of him outrunning his man down the floor and burying jumpers over DeAndre Jordan.
Itz: Of course it's Tim Duncan, like it's been for 18 years. Series line: 18-11-3-1-1.5 on 59% shooting. He also committed just one turnover a game in 36 minutes a night. I couldn't be prouder of Big Fun.
Gomez: Duncan, for sure. And weirdly, that's probably a reason why the Spurs lost. The days of Timmy being obviously the better offensive player on the Spurs roster were supposed to be over.
Wilco: The only guy on the team cool enough to have Theodore as his middle name. If we were able to put Kawhi's name here, then the Spurs are probably still playing.
3 - Who was the team's LVP?
Erler: Parker, no question. There isn't even a close second.
Passos: Tony Parker. The offensive futility of the Spurs' starting backcourt killed them, but at least Danny Green made up for it on defense.
Itz: Yes, Tony Parker, but in terms of expectations, it's Whi for me. Love the kid, but he wasn't as good as the Spurs needed him to be after a 25-game tear that made him look like a top-5 player. My expectations for him were really high while I didn't expect Parker to be great. Leonard has to be the best player on the team for the Spurs to get back to the top. The good news is that he's got another decade ahead of him to keep trying.
Gomez: Parker. I think he just wasn't himself because of injury, especially on the defensive end. But I also feel like it will take him some time to get used to a new role. He would force shots for a while, almost knowing that he wasn't going to touch the ball for minutes afterwards.
Wilco: Ugh, I don't like doing calling players least. But with how limited Parker was (and how long Pop has been saying that the Spurs aren't themselves without him playing well) it's hard to go with anyone else.
So, even the guy the said Kawhi didn't play up to expections (something everyone agrees on), never mentions Barnes.
Lol, ZERO video of Barnes "owning" Kawhi.
Kawhi is going to be a beast this season, book it.
I hope so and I hope his confidence has not been shattered by last playoffs.
He also has a great opportunity to avenge Matt Barnes if we face the Grizz
Game planners were a little shaken by this one tbh.
Barnes is in your head, perhaps, but not Kawhi's.
I'm just judging by facts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
