Reply With Quote
Right, your cuck poop fart jokes are really showing me
You're much better at being the butt of jokes than anything else. I still wuv you my widdle racist liberal teddy bear. How you manage to pull that off I'll never know.You guys are much better at the cuck poop fart jokes than you are at trying to figure out Pottery Barn law.
Do some more.
Right, your cuck poop fart jokes are really showing me
So you believe the fat should have been asked to pay for the clothes or leave correct?
No, not over a sweater that may or may not fit on the opinion of the old hag.
You guys are really going to extreme efforts in white knighting for her right to insult fat customers
Painter guy ruins clothes by staining them with his paint fingers, pay up or leave. Fat ruins clothes by stretching them out with her fat body, no harm no foul continue ruining store inventory.
Hypocritical white knight with a soft spot for obesity
My decision (and Walmart's) is based on PR. No white knighting for fat chicks.Painter guy ruins clothes by staining them with his paint fingers, pay up or leave. Fat ruins clothes by stretching them out with her fat body, no harm no foul continue ruining store inventory.
Hypocritical white knight with a soft spot for obesity
You guys white knighting for old hag would be terrible business owners.
Yeah if you like ing Brian Bosworth in a wig.
Why would she have to pay for the clothes or leave? She didn't try anything on, she didn't damage anything. The paint hands guy you used as a weak example actually put paint on the clothes and damaged them, the fat chick did nothing but carry clothes towards the dressing room, no clothes was damaged. I think most store managers would agree that accusing customers of willfully trying to damage the goods without any evidence is not good business practice.
Good thing that old bat has these guys white knighting for her cuz Walmart sure as ain't gonna do it as they've claimed "it is not the store's policy to police what customers want to try on."
"Update 2/5, 9:18 a.m.: Alex Roberton, senior director of corporate affairs of Walmart Canada, confirmed the incident to Cosmopolitan.com in an email, saying management at the store where it happened has "discussed the matter" with the employee. Roberton added that Walmart is reaching out to Friesen and that "we are very sorry to hear of our customer's experience — we never want a customer to feel mistreated in any way."
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyl...shaming-video/
Because in my scenario fat did damage clothes. Do you tell her to stop, pay, and leave or do you let her continue to ruin inventory?
She'll get a free quarter pounder from the Mickeys inside and she'll be like " yeah".
A 300 pound woman with a small wool sweater headed to the dressing room is no different than a homeless man covered in asking to test drive a new Ferrari.
Yuck I was thinking more like a rotisserie chicken.
Apparently not to Walmart. They support her trying on whatever she wants in whatever size she wants.
They don't support her ruining inventory
Maalox imagine yourself the owner of a trendy little boutique. Said whale beaches herself in your store, grabs a bunch of pe e sized blouses and tries to head to the dressing room. You don't think she'll be able to navigate through the small swinging door but there is a chance she forces her way in and ruins a thousand dollars of clothing in a matter of minutes. Do you let her continue on because you don't want to offend her or do be honest and tell her she's just too ing big to try the blouses on?
Walmart doesn't give a . They have 20 cents worth of clothes on a rounder.
If you want to kick her out of the store, go for it. But she'll probably get on social media and tell her followers what a you are. And social media can be a amirite
walmart shoppers will not be offended.
they already have a low expectation regarding their life.
could have just waited until actual damage was done and then made her pay for it. Stupid employee, that's why you work at walmart
actually...as a nation.....we all need to work together to make sure this woman remains clothed.
Don't know Canada law, but no, they really can't legally make her pay for incidentally damaging clothes while trying them on. They can only do what old hag did and tell her she can't try it on and yank the sweater.
So if you "Don't know Canada law" what is your comment based on?
Do you support Larry Harris' lawsuit like you support Clock Girl at Walmart?
In 1997, Larry Harris of Illinois broke into a bar owned by Jessie Ingram. Ingram, the victim of several break-ins, had recently set a trap around his windows to deter potential burglars. Harris, 37, who was under the influence of both alcohol and drugs, must have missed the warning sign prominently displayed in the window. He set off the trap as he entered the window, electrocuting himself. The police refused to file murder charges. Harris's family saw it differently, however, and filed a civil suit against Ingram. A jury originally awarded the Harris family $150,000. Later, the award was reduced to $75,000 when it was decided Harris should share at least half of the blame.
American law, genius.
On its face that lawsuit blows. I'm pretty good with castle doctrine laws here in Texas.Do you support Larry Harris' lawsuit like you support Clock Girl at Walmart?
In 1997, Larry Harris of Illinois broke into a bar owned by Jessie Ingram. Ingram, the victim of several break-ins, had recently set a trap around his windows to deter potential burglars. Harris, 37, who was under the influence of both alcohol and drugs, must have missed the warning sign prominently displayed in the window. He set off the trap as he entered the window, electrocuting himself. The police refused to file murder charges. Harris's family saw it differently, however, and filed a civil suit against Ingram. A jury originally awarded the Harris family $150,000. Later, the award was reduced to $75,000 when it was decided Harris should share at least half of the blame.
Nice situational sidebar that had nothing to do with this thread tho.
Which you are applying to Canadian law, Sophist.American law, genius.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions