Theres a lot of unexplored truth here.
Best place for Howard is Dallas,,,,
I already said that pages ago
Good for you,,,,you want a cookie?,,
Needs to go to a contender. But he probably doesn't care about fit at this point. Whoever is going to pay him the max is where he will want to go. And its looking like no one will.
Yep, dj is right. He is deathly afraid of the money running out...sooner or later. He can control the money flow. He cannot control anything else and is wise enough to realize it now when the money can still be incredible. I'll give him credit here.
Not much info coming out so I take it no one is willing to trade for him. Seems like a ploy to show Howard and his agent that no one is willing to pay him the max. If they have been trying to trade him for a month then he wont get traded.
Last edited by djohn2oo8; 02-15-2016 at 09:23 AM.
I hope Morey maxes him out.
They already told him no max. Which is why he wanted a trade. Btw, yall are about to max Whiteside and Derozan this summer.I hope Morey maxes him out.
I like them both, but not for the max.
Doubt anyone falls for it. Maybe Jordan
Big news. Tiago Splitter out for the year. So if Atlanta trades Horford, they will need a C
what a good trade by the spurs. They trade hill for Kiwi and hill hasnt ever reached his potential and trade high on Splitter so they have space to get Lamarcus ...not sure who sold their soul but almost every Spur move comes up aces. That has to change eventually. sure they are smart, but they also have been lucky too. Dangerous combination.
It wont matter if they get creamed by GS.
RC getting out of that contract just in time
They have had a couple of major ups along the way too though. Paying Richard Jefferson $40 million after a horrible first season in San Antonio was a pretty bad move. As was salary dumping Luis Scola to Houston in the summer of 2007.
Still, LOL at this bleacher report article claiming the Hill for Leonard trade was the second biggest mistake in franchise history
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/7...r-ever/page/10
That is why I said ALMOST ...They have had a couple of major ups along the way too though. Paying Richard Jefferson $40 million after a horrible first season in San Antonio was a pretty bad move. As was salary dumping Luis Scola to Houston in the summer of 2007.
Still, LOL at this bleacher report article claiming the Hill for Leonard trade was the second biggest mistake in franchise history
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/7...r-ever/page/10
But one of the things I like about SA is overall even when it doesnt make sense like cutting SJax right before the playoffs (IIRC) Spurs find a way to make things work. getting and resurrecting Diaw, mills. cutting bait on Neal, RMJ, belli when folks here felt it was a mistake. Spurs have deserved the props as the Pats of the NBA really honestly and truly a few mistakes for either (Pats had re-signed Aaron Hernandez) is just speed bumps.
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=h29jg6g - take it or leave it son.
Doubt anyone falls for it. Maybe Jordan
In most cases it's actually player development.
I doubt ginobili, Parker, green, kawhi, mills, splitter, or diaw turned out the way they did in any other teams.
In fact, some of them tried and didn't amount to anything.
then you aren't giving some players enough credit. ginobili would've been ginobili on any team. and patty mills averaged the most points per game in the 2012 olympics. so he was already a scorer.
even diaw had shown to be capable, when motivated, a la his phoenix suns day.
Olympics?
Of course it's some player development but selling High on Hill and getting Kiwi requires smarts and luck first then development. You can see how much Parker and Kiwi have improved in SA no doubt they do a great job. I have been arguing Lakers should double their shooting coach salary to move to L.A. but they dont listen to me ...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote