That's you.
Supreme Court decisions would be "suggestions" in Trump's America.
That's you.
Didn't even bother reading after the stupid/lazy insult. I made the error before of giving you any more of my time again when you did that before, and made the mistake of even reacting at you with an insult. I'm done with that from you. Go have a discussion with some other miserable person.
Possibly. I despise Hillary Clinton and don't want her picking 3-4 supreme court justices.
so you'd rather have Trash giving us more Scalia's and Thomas'? I'm Trash's SCOTUS midgets would do a lot worse than the abomination of C-U, gutting the VRA, killing class actions.
As opposed to Setemayors and Kagans? yes.
some examples of the Sotomayors and Kagans bad jurisprudence, dissents, opinions?
Fair cop. I was an ass.
That said, if the pattern of your thought processes false equivalences based on lazy cynicism, that doesn't lose me much, IMO.
smh "someone on the internet was mean to me,"
God forbid we don't cater to millenials' egos.![]()
Take off your red glasses for a moment, and look at the proposals.
Vast gulf in fiscal responsibility. One is tax and spend, the other is borrow massively and spend.
Which is more responsible?
it's not even about me. That's what you don't get. You think I'm, personally, bothered by your attack?
You think you know more than you actually do. That's your problem. And you allow yourself to go on thinking you do because you insult everyone who doesn't agree with you to the point where they dgaf about saying to you & you've either left either talking to a bunch of people who agree with you only, talking to a bunch of people who insult you too (distracting from the actual argument), or talking to nobody at all, but so infatuated with your own voice you do it anyway.
So, nah, people like you don't bother me dude. Don't think so highly of yourself.
And, good to know you know your an ass. Yet, you then proceed to be an ass.
Have a good one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)