You have the ball. Trump president.
I don’t care about your party excuses.
Cant you just claim we will grow our way out?
You got nothing.
Bruh, neither party wants to do much about the debt; you know that.
You have the ball. Trump president.
I don’t care about your party excuses.
Cant you just claim we will grow our way out?
You got nothing.
Are you aware of the debt increase under Obama? You're arguing that Obama was a terrible president, dip .![]()
Yes. And that was a promised fix.
It’s worse bruhwelchmylunchfromykids.
Your ball, who has no balls.
It’s what whites are best at. That and genocide.
Glad you're aware that Obama was a bad president, bruh.
Dont you get tired of getting destroy on a night to night basis?
Every time you tagged El, you come out looking like Robocop's melting man. ing re .
Are you ing serious with this
You and boutons should hold a nickname contest. Embarrassing
Somebody has a man crush; or I guess for you it's just called a crush.
![]()
I'll double down on it...
1) Now sure where you got those numbers and how you can even quantify that.
2) Amount doesn't mean it's all positive coverage. Doesn't take long to find criticism of her actions.
3) She was part of this administration, which is flamboyant to say the least. The president lashing out on twitter and giving her more publicity doesn't help either. She's selling a book, will look for attention.
4) FBI agents have a right to vote and have political opinions, plus Shillary has been irrelevant since the election, but even if you want to argue it's not been covered, a simple google search for Strzok will give you at least a dozen articles from Fox News to ABC, CNN, Boston Globe, Houston Chronicle, etc etc etc just in the last 24 hours.
I mean, it's not surprising that Omarosa took the headlines, explosive remarks often do that. Heck, Trump rode that schtick to the Whitehouse.
lol thanks, but I don't need defenders, and I'm not 'destroying' anybody... I'll gladly have an honest convo with anybody as long as it's kept above the belt...
If you're convinced the media is largely liberal, I won't try to un-convince you... I'll just respectfully disagree...
He gets destroyed on every argument he gets into. Not just you.
1. A media tracker company.
2. Positive/negative really isn't the matter at hand, tbh. FFS, it's tawdry gossip vs. an FBI agent in the tank for a presidential candidate being investigated for felonies (and then being fired in the aftermath).
3. The large percentage difference was inevitable either way, bruh.
4. Yea, Strzok is on the up and up; that's why he had to continue to say he wouldn't answer fundamental questions. Also, the texts were before he ever even interviewed Hillary. His actions were unprofessional and the mickey mouse investigation reflects that.
zilla69s is what I've got so far.
Let me have some coffee.
Hey you should post more from Black Lives Matter let’s see how yet another alt account works out.
Ok give me the password.![]()
I would not say media is liberal
It is owned by corporations which have strong links to wall street, military industrial complex and other apparatus in the corporatocracy
Thus why they push their neocon, wall street agenda
That plus they are anti-trump![]()
This thread could easily be called "Trump horrible personnel decision #24,505"
Doubt it
and yet you didnt doubt the gorilla channel
Love that channel tbh have it on all day
Tazmanian Devil channel is legit too
Trump staffer Katrina Pierson suggests it’s fine to call a woman a dog: “It depends on what she did”
An iden y politics built on stirring white resentment has leaped from Fox News airwaves into the GOP platform
https://www.salon.com/2018/08/15/tru...-what-she-did/
Repugs have been racist since Goldwater.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)