Reply With Quote
Any CCTV footage is probably better than any analysis of skid marks + crush energy.
At the end of the day, the dude was dunk and killed someone. The excessive speed is just the final nail. I don't think knowing the exact speed is too important.
Happy to cede that in this case, you have more expertise.
If you had to estimate a speed here for the victim, absent any specific black box data, what would estimate that to be?
(not asking for a method of ascertaining it, just a back of the envelope expert guess)
Any CCTV footage is probably better than any analysis of skid marks + crush energy.
At the end of the day, the dude was dunk and killed someone. The excessive speed is just the final nail. I don't think knowing the exact speed is too important.
What would a reasonable speed for the woman who got hit be? Surely you have some guess. Put a number to it.
RG hurting, trying to recover.
Crawl away and lick your wounds.
That you Reck?
Asking for a triggered Poster B looking to interview you for a “W” that involves male on tranny relations, no .
Just can't acknowledge expertise in someone you don't like.RG hurting, trying to recover.
Crawl away and lick your wounds.
Your dumb ass would have to draw blood for there to be a wound in the first place.
Anyone: [statement based on expertise and critical thinking]
DMC: that's just dumb, because... reasons.
Whatevs.
???That you Reck?
Asking for a triggered Poster B looking to interview you for a “W” that involves male on tranny relations, no .
This is absolutely such a disingenuous take of something you did not even read.RG hurting, trying to recover.
Crawl away and lick your wounds.
DMCs contribution shot down because he walked in half brained and a 1/4 informed per usual.
Cry more
DarrinS took you out back to the woodshed and tanned your hideJust can't acknowledge expertise in someone you don't like.
Your dumb ass would have to draw blood for there to be a wound in the first place.
Anyone: [statement based on expertise and critical thinking]
DMC: that's just dumb, because... reasons.
Whatevs.
You went from 'I'm an expert" to "Well we're both experts" to "You're more of an expert than me" to "whatevs"
The retort when you are on empty.
You never addressed it or you would have said, my mistake, they have info on the corvette.
You walk into the middle of stuff without any understanding and think you will make a contribution... as long as, "Its not my field of study, Nor do I dont talk about MY expertise or do requests" to bail yourself out.
You are transparent.
Particle physics my ass...
DarrinS took you out back to the woodshed and tanned your hide
You went from 'I'm an expert" to "Well we're both experts" to "You're more of an expert than me" to "whatevs"
So desperate to get in the last word, you double down on your failures in reasoning. As always, you try to hard... and fail so much.
Sad.
Pure trolling at this point, tbh. Even he doesn't believe his own stuff, he is just harping on it for a reaction. Kind of like... derp did.
You ignored my response. If you know nothing about both vehicles and only see the crash, you cannot use the speed limit sign to estimate their speeds. If you cannot do it with both you cannot do it with one. It doesn't matter that you already know something about the corvette, you couldn't have used the speed limit sign to get therePERIOD. End of story.
You're way too impressed with physics. It's almost like you dropped out of some physics classes because you lacked the wherewithal to be successful.
So desperate to get in the last word, you double down on your failures in reasoning. As always, you try to hard... and fail so much.
Sad.
You try to portray yourself as a savant but you're barely above lukewarm IQ.
The stupid, it burns.
Why do you think Darrin is being cagy with what he thinks? It is because my estimate is reasonable.
Unfortunately for your pedantic dumb ass, it is possible to draw reasonable conclusions based on incomplete data.
For your ed statement to be true here, the following would have to be true for the victims car:
"All speeds are equally likely".
Since the corvette was going faster than the victims car, are all speeds under 127 MPH equally likely, ? Yes or no?
You do it all the time!.. just like that *snap* it comes to you.Unfortunately for your pedantic dumb ass, it is possible to draw reasonable conclusions based on incomplete data.
How would you know the corvette was going faster than the victim's car just by looking at the speed limit signs?For your ed statement to be true here, the following would have to be true for the victims car:
"All speeds are equally likely".
Since the corvette was going faster than the victims car, are all speeds under 127 MPH equally likely, ? Yes or no?
You're a tool. Not even a useful one.
This is flat out wrong.
He used what he had which was reasonable.
The time the vehicles are in contact is also a reasonable range. There is no way they are all exactly the same. They are made of different material contacting, the vehicle is an extended mass... many variables.
This is physics you dumbass; with estimates that are reasonable. You cant know every detail about every atom involved.
Particle physics... wrote for Popular Science and Time magazine... expert on Vacuums (I guess this helps out while DMC is running the show slamming particles into his head)
Obviously he didn't use what he had per the discussion. You're moving the goalpost to information other than just a speed limit sign.
You cannot determine the speed of a car based on the speed limit sign, period end of ing story.
You're really upset over the fact I am a professional and you're a talker online. You mention it in almost every post.
Officer "Do you know why I pulled you over?"
Me "Was I speeding?"
Officer "Well I don't know how fast you were going since I don't have a radar gun but based on that speed limit sign that says 45mph, you were going about 45mph, so no, I pulled you over because you're driving the wrong way on a one way street"
Me "how do you know that, there's no speed limit sign"
Officer "hmmm. ok you can go but be careful"
Last edited by DMC; 11-10-2021 at 09:58 PM.
No goalposts have been moved as you dont even know which field you are playing on.
RG used what is a reasonable assessment and you cant stand it when called on it. You did not even know the corvete had info on is as you stepped into the middle of you dont know. All of this started with reasonable estimations you dumb fk.
I am a professional talker on line. Really. I am the word salad guy, but now I am the professional online talker online. Pick a lane.
Offline you are obviously the professional because you never talk about things you know about online. Great logic there grumpa.
I am quite entertained because with each discussion you show what a fake you are.
I know more science than you do on the whole. There is show no shame in that. Except dont go all big on us and claim you write for a science magazine.
And I know and do far more science OFFline than you have ever even thought about. No shame in that either. You dont work with it, you dont think about it. I do.
STick to your guns... and trucks.
Since the corvette was going faster than the victims car, are all speeds under 127 MPH equally likely, ? Yes or no?
Not an answer, .
You do it all the time!.. just like that *snap* it comes to you.
How would you know the corvette was going faster than the victim's car just by looking at the speed limit signs?
You're a tool. Not even a useful one.
Since the corvette was going faster than the victims car, are all speeds for the victims car under 127 MPH equally likely, ? Yes or no?
I wonder if the prosecution (or defense) will use this thread as evidence.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
