Reply With Quote
No. Insisting upon personal responsibility is a hallmark of social conservatism. Machismo bull is not.
Mommy, Gtown called me a girl first! TEll him to play fair!!
No. Insisting upon personal responsibility is a hallmark of social conservatism. Machismo bull is not.
One of the identifying characteristics of human beings is the ability to control their sex drive. If you can't, then you're just a monkey who can type.
I seem to remember reading an article on kids in the US that told about two studies run in the fifties and one run fairly recently. The one in the fifties did blood tests and found that in 10% of the cases, the child was not related to the father that was taking care of it (basically the woman had cheated and let the original father care for the child as it's own). They didn't believe the results and then ran a similar study a few decades later, and came up with similar results.
One out of every ten kids in the US is the result of infedelity.
I'm sure some of you won't believe this, and I wanted to make a bit more sure of it so I did a small amount of work on google and found this link that referenced several studies:
http://www.canadiancrc.com/Child_iden y_rights.htm
A British survey conducted between 1988 and 1996 by Robin Baker, a former professor at the University of Manchester, confirmed the 10-per-cent figure. That seems high to skeptics such as Dalhousie University geneticist Paul Neumann, although even he admitted that "my colleague, who's a woman, tells me women have no trouble believing it. . . . It's the men who can't."
Jeanette Papp of the University of California at Los Angeles, feels that 15 per cent is rate of paternity fraud for the Western world, even if there is no hard evidence. "It's hard to do studies on these things for ethical reasons," says Dr. Papp, director of genotyping and sequencing in UCLA's department of human genetics. "I mean, how do you tell people what you're really looking for?"
Bernard ens, a specialist in health law and policy at the University of Toronto, said that in another British example, the non-paternity rate was three times that.
"In the early 1970s, a schoolteacher in southern England assigned a class science project in which his students were to find out the blood types of their parents. The students were then to use this information to deduce their own blood types (because a gene from each parent determines your blood type, in most instances only a certain number of combinations are possible). Instead, 30 per cent of the students discovered their dads were not their biologically [sic] fathers. "
Hmmm....
Did a bit more digging and found a better, more scientific figure:
Around 4%
http://health.dailynewscentral.com/c...ew/0001484/52/
Interesting thing to reserach. I would suggest googling things like "paternity" and "test" with some other words if you want to do more digging.
The rate of paternity fraud is irrelevant, I think, to my point. Just because people can control their sex drive doesn't mean they always will make responsible choices.
But if one wants to make the point that "I can't help it, I'm a man , I need sex," then either that individual is just a selfish asshole making excuses rather than being responsible for his actions, or that individual is a talking ape.
Mommy, Gtown called me a girl first! TEll him to play fair!!
Shows your maturity level. You need someone to lower themselves to to your level and start insulting and namecalling to make you feel comfortable. Kori's right. Your insults don't give your arguement more credibility. Not that you had any to begin with. But I called You a name after your constant childish remarks. But I am better than that, so You can stay being "You". Name call and insult all u want, doesn't make u more of a man. I'm up for discussion or debate, not your childish ways.
That's all.
you should run for congress
10% is definitly relivant. That means at least 10% are paying some for a kid that is not his. If this was you, I bet you would find it relivant. Mr. T, you were very entertaining on Jimmy Kimmel. Go Spurs
Most responsible adults don't have these kinds of issues. I think you've heard Gold Digger a few too many times.
Spurswoman, how many women have you dated? I rest my case.
Hey, my best friend is a woman....
And why do you assume I've never dated one?
You need to date alot of women then you see how a majority of them are. Tom Leykis and other shows have statistically proven these facts over n over. Women only make about 73% on the dollar cause most of them are lazy or are just at work till they get nocked up or find a man. Men have to work, for women it is an option.
If I don't work I'd lose my house and my kids would starve ... and I couldn't renew my season tickets. I really don't consider that an "option."
You noticed you said human beings. Well my remark about it "takes two to tango" is precisely that. Man and Womyn bear the responsiblity. Many Men and women have casual sex all the time, you can't blame it all on the man. The woman has more control in consentual sex than the man. She can take action to make sure she's not pregnant. Besides, i think the woman who dated the man that was married should have had more respect for herself and not be total trash.
I'm sorry when did i take on the le as "Spokesman for Conservatism" I thought that was your gig. But seriously, you want to talk personal responsibility, well it also rest on the female. She has that option of not sleeping with married men.
You really hate women, don't you?
So you believe the majority of women are selfish es who want to steal from men. Ohh, and they are also lazy.
As Kori said, you bring little to the forum.
Sure she does. And when she makes that choice, she can get pregnant and have a child, and she's stuck. It's not very easy for her to flout her responsibility.
But the guy doesn't get pregnant, so it's quite easy for him to abandon his responsibility to his children.
You're right that it takes two to tango. And both of them should be held accountable.
Your social views do seem to be an accurate depiction of conservatism, that is, Mexican conservatism.
Damn, I didn't have $100K when we had our kids. Still don't.
Money isn't everything when it comes to being a good parent.
This thread isn't about being a good parent. This is about lowlifes who want to be able to as much as they please without consequences, and who view women as objects to that end rather than as human beings.
I have already started on my second 100K, gave up on the first.
Well, even people who you would not consider "lowlifes" want to be able to fornicate as much as they please without consequences and view women as objects to that end rather than as human beings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions