I'm NOT in shock. I don't agree with it. Two different things. I happen to disagree that he deserves it. His past problems should not enter in here. Punishment should be based on the act itself, not history. If he should have been suspended before, they should have done it then. This infraction would not have been suspendable FOR ANYONE ELSE. I don't know how to make that any plainer. Next, if we're gonna punish a guy for everything he's ever done wrong in his life over a simple infraction, we'll be punishing people for what we are afraid they MIGHT DO IN THE FUTURE. Slippery slope.

Reply With Quote
