Word. AHF, we may not agree on the Malik Rose situation but I'm with you on this 100%
How is that any different than your bull about the Spurs getting all the calls and the Mavs getting screwed by the stripes?Exactly what I thought, some ing idiot would step up with some bull about how the Spurs have been getting screwed by the officials.
Look in the mirror asswipe.
Word. AHF, we may not agree on the Malik Rose situation but I'm with you on this 100%
The Spurs play an inside-out game a lot of the time, with at least 3 shooters around the arch. They aren't taking the ball to the hoop near as hard as the Mavs. So it isn't just the 3 per game, it's them swarming out around the arch creating the constant threat of a 3-pointer to keep the defenses honest on Duncan.
Mavs play more of a penetrate and kick out game, where the player goes strong to the basket and kicks to the perimeter for a shot or another drive. The Mavs have much more athletic players that are slashers, the Spurs have set-up shooters, see the difference?
Considering points in the paint in our series with you guys was a wash, I'm going to have to disagree with you on this.The Spurs play an inside-out game a lot of the time, with at least 3 shooters around the arch. They aren't taking the ball to the hoop near as hard as the Mavs.
Yeah, you apparently have the IQ of a two year old.see the difference?
Look you in' moron, never once did I say that the Mavs got screwed by the officials. Can't handle that I'm breaking up your little "we lost because of the refs party," so you have start making up things that I never said.
You're gettin awfully pissy these days. Take a Pamprin or scroll, .
For a call in THE FIRST HALF? Are you joking you ing crybaby?![]()
Jesus H. Christ. Dallas was the better team, get over it. Pray your front office decides to sign some real free agents this summer and not more washed up over the hill veterans or you'll be watching us win the WCF next year too.
I'm not a Mavs fan, so if you're refering to points in the paint against the Mavs being a wash then that means nothing because the Spurs shot more FTs than the Mavs. Besides, I was refering to difference of 410 FTs shot over the reguar season, not what happened in the Mavs series. How about you follow the thread a little closer you dumb ? Instead of jumping with random insults and stats that have nothing to do with the what is being discussed.
What I don't get is all these fans who come in here and tell us how to act. It's a Spurs forum, and you act like its the end of the world when there are biased opinions to the Spurs.
![]()
forgot Finley even got the foul called.
&%$#@@@* DAVID STERN!
Maverick zodiac sign. The year of the zebra.
Dallas was marginally the better team and, certainly, one point in most games of that series would have made a big difference.
With that said, I think those who are claiming the Spurs lost because of that call are in a pretty small minority. The Mavericks made plays and the Spurs didn't. Did it hurt the Spurs to have an unwarranted technical foul assessed against them? Sure. Did it decide the series? No.
The only dumb here is you. You insisted that the Mavs shot more in the paint, which is why they shot more FTs against the Spurs.. Besides, I was refering to difference of 410 FTs shot over the reguar season, not what happened in the Mavs series. How about you follow the thread a little closer you dumb ?
I pointed out the points in the paint were a wash, which contradicts your dumb statement about how our offenses differed.
Maybe Artest donkey punched you one too many times in the head the other night for you to get it.
You are a ing re , can you even read? Go back to the begining and read the thread, twice so you don't this up, again.
Listen closely, I said that the reason that the Mavs shot more FTs in the regular season was because they attack the basket more than the Spurs, OK? Sit for a minute and let that sink in re .
I wouldn't insist on any reason why the Mavs shot more FTs against the Spurs, because they didn't! The Spurs shot more FTs in the series you in' moron! Do you get it now? Probably not.
Last edited by BAkriD; 05-29-2006 at 05:11 PM.
?????
ok, I'll forgive Stern for the "a little bit too late" decision on this oneI cross out 1 game.
I will make this one my sig to remind everyone that the 2006 WC Semis was actually a draw as of this time.
BTW, I don't about you but I never been so bored watching the WC finals![]()
I really miss the Spurs.
We handed you guys a Game 7 at home and couldnt finish the job, get over it. Spurs didnt come throught when it mattered the mavs did and thats why there still playing
Hey everyone let's thank the noob for his opinion.
Let me introduce you to your room
![]()
The spurs didn't bring it in GAME 7 and that was caused by tough shots by the mavs, pathetic coaching, and lack of execution. PERIOD.
Technical Foul Butterfly Theory.
Oh ok, so the Mavs lost games 5 & 6 on purpose to be nice to the Spurs and give them a Game 7 at home? Aww, what a bunch of effing sweethearts.![]()
I believe that by discussing the alternate timeline, we are influencing the alternate timeline.
It's Mavs in seven there,too.
LMAO...unbelievable...![]()
Close...![]()
A remorseful Stern? Hmmm...
Nah.
On a side note, Mavs fans must really have nothing else to do. And no sense of humor either ^.
I know I'm a little late with this thread but:
Isn't this sort of like rubbing salt on a wound or something? Now fans will always be thinking WHAT IF......![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)