The Detroit News article is totally different than the ESPN.com article. ESPN says it's 52M and the Pistons wouldn't go higher than 48M. DN says it's ~60M and that the Pistons went up to 51.8M. I wonder what the truth is.
If it's the first scenario, then it sucks the Pistons lost him over 4M. If it's the second, then no blame to the Pistons.



