Name one war where innocent civilians weren't killed.
[QUOTE]I must have missed the proof that you provided of this. Mind posting it again? Thanks.
Name one war where innocent civilians weren't killed.
Sincerely,
Hezbollah.
It always amazes me how both sides to this conflict use the exact same justifications and don't realize it.
Do some homework. Hezbollah runs those TV stations.
Guys, they have apologized. What they are also doing is trying to make sure the UN doesn't demonize them for it, because the UN is looking for any excuse not to have to send peacekeepers.
http://ottsun.canoe.ca/News/National...04352-sun.html
You're right, they accepted responsibility right away. I made the mistake of accepting the arguements of the resident idiots (the UN was stupid to be near Hezbollah and thats why they got bombed) as an official Isreali position when I knew it wasn't.
Anyhow, Israel has never stopped doing someting out of fear of collateral damange. They don't care who gets in their way as long as they can get the job done.
You lost me on the second paragraph MIG. That's your opinion, fine, but it's certainly not something you can substantiate.
In actuality I believe they've shown far more restraint over the years than we would have shown under the same cir stances.
Well, it appears that Kofi may, indeed, owe Israel an apology
Annan's Claims On Casualties May Unravel
Interesting.
Oh, by the way, jochhejaam; Substantiation isn't something Manny worries about. If it occurs in his brain, it must be true.
By all accounts, the vast majority of deaths and causalties on the Lebanon side have been civilians. The Israeli justification is that these same places are Hezbollah strongholds and offices and the civilians are Hezbollah supporters. It seems to me the same justification works just as well for Hezbollah's attacks on Israel.
Really? Haifa is an Israeli military stronghold? There are Israeli soldiers bunkered down in residences and among families in Israel? The IDF is firing from fence lines and rooftops of UN compounds?
And, I don't recall Israel ever claiming the dead civilians were Hezbollah supporters. While many of them probably are, I don't think that could be said of the infants and young children.
Seriously, what choice did the Israelis have? When the Hezbollah chooses to engage, militarily, from civilian and residential -- and ostensibly nuetral -- locations, what do you do? Hope they run out of bullets and that none of their munitions hit their mark -- and, then, go in and arrest them?
The Canadian email sums up the uselessness of UN troops and observers. Think Ahnan will dodge questions about this?
UNIFIL's mandate expires next Monday. I doubt it will be renewed.
They spent a couple of decades doing nothing more than watching Hezbollah entrench themselves in Southern Lebanon and facilitate skirmishes with Israel.
I think Annan will dodge questions about this, just as he does with every other UN failure.
I've said it before and I'll say it again; The United Nations did a damn good job of distributing food and bandaids. It's the only thing they ever did well and, they screwed that up when they started meddling in conflict resolution, (i.e. Oil-for-Food). They should give up and go back to strictly distributing food and bandaids.
There was something about this photo that seemed familiar or suggestive of past events...then, it struck me.
The ambulances-for-terrorists scandal
UN troops operate on mandates, if mandate states that they must not intervene or attack hostile forces then they won't. If they want UN troops to be more effective they must give them more power/full authority. If they are there just as observers they will just observe.
Or, they will help the terrorists.
The UN should be pulled out if hostilities occur.
STOLEN FROM CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER:
What say the Hezbollah apologists? Exactly why did Hezbollah attack Israel?
because Israel occupied Lebanon.
So, the Hezbollah say they invaded Israel, killed 8 IDF soldiers, and kidnapped 2 others so that Israel would be extorted into a prisoner exchange. Their idiotic miscalculation aside, just who do you think they wanted in exchange for the 2 IDF soldiers' lives? And, is their demand reasonable?
From a BBC article:
That's the sanitized version of this monster's crime. Here, in the words of the wife and mother, is what happened:
And there are people in this forum who believe the Hezbollah have a legitimate position. Un-frickin'-believable.
I do like what our U.N. Ambassador John Bolton had to say in his opening remarks at yesterday's confirmation hearing:
Who said they have a legitimate position?
I think your confused. Only in the minds of hezbollah does legitimate position exist. Do you understand the difference? I don't think there are any hezbollah cheerleaders in this place.
Well, maybe "please don't ban me"
Israel completely pulled out in 2000, pursuant to a UNSC resolution that also placed UNIFIL peacekeepers in Southern Lebanon that were supposed to insure that Hezbollah disarmed.
Again, why did Hezbollah attack Israel this month?
And, velik_m apparently.
i don't cheer for Hezbollah, i just don't like Israel's policy and i think it will be their undoing.
What should have been Israel's policy?
Does Yonivore have the ability to form his own thoughts? I wonder.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)