Reply With Quote
I've went to UT games before EITHER of you were born.
He's went to games for over 30yrs???
I've went to UT games before EITHER of you were born.
I've went to UT games before EITHER of you were born.
Just to be fair.
ROFL, jgw-diowned, in the name of mercy I must stop the reign and direct it to the <DEATHBLOW> threadI love the way JillGayWhiney is getting laughed at all over.
Poor Trick, trying to live in a man's world.
marrioted
Last edited by mookie2001; 10-06-2006 at 07:02 PM.
unbelievable scott. i don't have to be a fan of a team to start a thread about that team, what the does that have to do with anything? and btw, i don't like OU, i just dislike t.u. more. i'd like to see OU win this weekend and then lose every game they play...okla .
i think its funny that dio posts i got owned for referring to Oklahoma by their actual name...good one dio. i don't know why Oklahoma goes by University of Oklahoma and OU...why don't you ask their university, i have nothing to do with it.
furthermore, i think it is humorous...all this owning and whatnot.
1. it appears when i make a factual post, i get owned
2. it appears when i make a logical post, i get owned
3. it appears when things have nothing to do with me, i get owned
...there is only one logical conclusion here, and that is dio is completely out of his mind. he seems to be so anxious to "own" me that he jumps on any chance before he even thinks about it.
"i have a dream...a dream that dio will leave this forum, and take all his wasteful posts with him."
...wait, dio...let me do it for you. "oooooh, you just got owned JGW, ha ha. eat it baby, eat it!"
ummm, OK.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dumbass speak....
blah blah blah
i think its funny that dio posts i got owned for referring to Oklahoma by their actual name...good one dio. i don't know why Oklahoma goes by University of Oklahoma and OU...why don't you ask their university, i have nothing to do with it.
You refer to a school by their real name?
So is it Trinity U. or The U. of Texas??
Good way to prove YOURSELF a hypocrite DUMBASS.
Less work for me.
===
===
1. it appears when i make a factual post, <---Yeah, like that ever happens..
2. it appears when i make a logical post, <----This rarely happens
3. it appears when things have nothing to do with me, i get owned <---This I admit does frequently happen, you're like a universal board or something.
===
===
"i have a dream...a dream that dio will leave this forum, and take all his wasteful posts with him."
is the poor baby tired of being my board !???
===
===
eat it baby, eat it!"
wow, such intelligence......
pleeeze hammer, don't hurt 'em!!Just to be fair.
love the way OU is moving the ball right now. AD and Thompson look pretty good....and have even overcome a turnover.
...no doubt. OSU walked all over t.u. and there is no shame in it, t.u. is still a good team. they just aren't anywhere near a top 5 team.
btw, BeerIsGood, you gotta be on some serious crack to think that by the end of the year t.u. will be able to beat USC and OSU...thats just stupid. are you basing that on getting whooped by OSU and then beating a bunch of crappy schools...good logic there man.
poor aggy talking about beating crappy schools? wow.
...but you did beat crappy schools, and then an OU team (today) that had 5 turnovers and outgained you by 100 yards. is t.u. good...yeah, they are. but they are not a top 5 team. answer me this? what happens if they play again and OU does not have all those turnovers? t.u. probably wins by a field goal; they still are not a top 5 team.
i'd put them @ 6 behind:
1. ohio state
2. USC (healthy)
3. michigan
4. florida
5. west virginia
...and if Georgia wins today i'd put them behind the dogs as well. can't put a one loss team ahead of an undefeated team in the SEC.
You're delusional. OU's best weapon this game was Greg ing Davis. With a good play caller UT is up at least 21 - 0, 21-7, or 28-7 at halftime on route to another big blowout. OU D gave up 6 yards on a QB sneak. That tells you all you need to know about who is the dominant line, and if you control the line of scrimmage you control the game. 5 TO, but only 1 wasn't forced, and Greg ing Davis didn't take advantage of the ones that were.
Listen closely here........
If UT played USC next weekend UT WOULD WIN by at least 7 points. And that's given the Greg ing Davis factor. Without Greg ing Davis it would be at least 14 to 17. Fact.
^ You do realize most of the posters in this forum are Horn fans, right? I mean if you want get your rocks off talking about usc and a&m go to their team boards, I'm sure you guys can have a big love fest over there-getting more delusional by the day about how good your teams are.
afraid thats not possible. i only post on two sites, this being the lesser, and i am already too entrenched to turn back now. besides, someone has to make you tea-sips accountable....its all about checks and balances.
i hope to god usc and texas end up in a bowl game again
ing own those california snatches twice in a row
so do i. cause we'll own you...in fact i pray we meet up again almost everyday. only thing is, you're going to have to play for the national championship to get a crack. cause USC is not going to lose...better hope Florida, West Virginia, Michigan and Ohio State lose...hmm, but that probably won't happen.
...but i hope it does.
its funny cuz even if we don't meet up again the record of my team versus yours for the national championship is still 1-0 TEXAS and you'll never be able to change the fact that we ing ripped you a new asshole in your own state
...enjoy it, then. and a 3 point win, is not ripping anything. and USC can always change the fact that t.u. won by kicking your ass in the future...besides history is always on Southern Cal's side.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
