Reply With Quote
I didn't expect perfection...and why would you expect that in a war?
You act like we can control everything....it's a fight.
The cheapest and easiest solution was nukes....would you prefer that?
Oh that's right -- you think we didn't do anything wrong at all.Right as in what?
Just as you predicted.
Utter perfection.
Cakewalk.
I didn't expect perfection...and why would you expect that in a war?
You act like we can control everything....it's a fight.
The cheapest and easiest solution was nukes....would you prefer that?
Because, if the result of your war is a worse situation than what existed beforehand then you have failed, utterly and completely.
Last edited by turambar85; 11-30-2006 at 09:01 AM.
^^You lose this argument. Because you have displayed you true feelings about
any rational argument by the the statement: "Your War". Obviously you do not
consider yourself part of this nation. Therefore you have no say in how we conduct
our affairs.
Well ray count me in with the majority of this 'nation' who sees this war as a war of choice and unecessary...
^^20 percent is your majority? Wow!
are the democrats the new isolationist..?
Hmm...ok. I guess that since I prefer to call something that I had no say in, and about which I have actually voiced my complaints both publicly and privately, my own then I have no part in the country that elected the President that decided to do this...logical X.
Lets see where this logic takes us. CLinton was elected with a majority of the popular vote. Clinton got a blow-job in office. Thus, it was not his blow-job, but the blowjob of about 100 million people.
Actually, it is even worse, since you believe that for me to be an American citizen it must be "my war" then it must have been every American citizens blowjob. I'm sure a lot of people wish that they had known about that one X.
It is not my war just as it is not my gay marriage ban. I fight each of those two, they are not something that can be attributed to myself.
It is your war. I take no claim of any unjust war of terror.
Great. Now we've ALL had Monica! It just doesn't feel special anymore.
But you see, Clinton was my President, whether
I liked it or not. I never said "your" president,
although I did write him and said if he worked
for me, he would have been fired. But then
again, that was my word direct to him.
But you stated it was: "my war" and you did
again in the above post.
I must therefore assume that My Family is my
family and none of your business. So butt out
of my war since you concede it has nothing to
do with you.
Doesn't work that way X. Our money is being spent on Iraq. If you can cover the $300,000,000 a day then give us back our share.
And if it's a question of whether our strategy in Iraq is working or not, let's go to the source:
Rumsfeld Memo Proposed ‘Major Adjustment’ in Iraq
By MICHAEL R. GORDON and DAVID S. CLOUD
Published: December 3, 2006
WASHINGTON, Dec. 2 — Two days before he resigned as defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld submitted a classified memo to the White House that acknowledged that the Bush administration’s strategy in Iraq was not working and called for a major course correction.
“In my view it is time for a major adjustment,” wrote Mr. Rumsfeld, who has been a symbol of a dogged stay-the-course policy. “Clearly, what U.S. forces are currently doing in Iraq is not working well enough or fast enough.”
Nor did Mr. Rumsfeld seem confident that the administration would readily develop an effective alternative. To limit the political fallout from shifting course he suggested the administration consider a campaign to lower public expectations.
“Announce that whatever new approach the U.S. decides on, the U.S. is doing so on a trial basis,” he wrote. “This will give us the ability to readjust and move to another course, if necessary, and therefore not ‘lose.’ ”.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/wo...rtner=homepage
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
