No, they have one first rounder and two seconds.
rookie point guards are not perfect
you have to use patience with them
tp is a rare case
and pop did not want to go to him so quick but was forced to
No, they have one first rounder and two seconds.
I know that I'm not a Spurs fan but I am a fan of the NBA. Not only a fan of the NBA, a Lakers fanI always wanted to say that! They use that slogan on the Lakers channel.
Anyway, although I know that having Oneal would make the Spurs one of the best in the league. I would really like to see that. Tim does not have the game to play this run and gun, small ball game. If the Spurs are going to keep him and if they want to win with him. They have to go back to his game. That's a halfcourt game slowing the game down. Oneal would be perfect for the spurs and Duncan at this juncture of his career. He could provide some offensive help for Duncan and teams would have to guard both of those players. I want to see a twins tower, to put a stop to this small ball bull . I want to see teams go back to pounding the post and taking high percentage shots instead of all these low percentage bricks we are seeing daily in the NBA today. I want to see teams having to match up with the spurs rather than teams matching up to this small ball game. Trade Manu or Parker, doesnt really matter. A player like Oneal does not come often. The spurs will have to overpay to get Duncan some quality help. What's overpaying for 3 years? Go for it, I guarantee that they wont regret it!![]()
I thought the Spurs have a conditional 2nd first round pick, although i cant remember from who
We have a conditional second round pick from Chicago..if its before the 50th pick we get nothing, after the 50th pick we get it.
This is the best situation that the Spurs will come across for a long time to come, if they don't go after O'Neal and invest some money in this player they are not serious about spending any money on quality players.
Good players spend the money; over the hill players they come cheap.
i think were gonna have to give away one of our big three (duncan, ginobili, parker) to get o'neal, unfortunately. The Pacers are gonna want someone sexy to give away their man.
spurs wanted kidd oneal or brand
they stuck out on all three
spurs were willing to pay the max to any of the three
Agree Manu is the one who has some trade value and would be the better one to trade than Parker.
Carlos Arroyo may be available for those who want a pg. He isn't a high assit man but the spurs don't play a style that lends to a need for a high assit style pg. A good shooting pg with low turnovers and some offensive fire power is a better fit.
Kori, the main part of the Tony's job as "running the offense" is to penetrate and create opportunity for his temmates by passing the ball to them (this is WHY is called a PG, NOT a shooting guard) - look at Nash and WHY he is Number 1 Point Guard in the League - he has 11 asts per game and also scores - look at the Suns - they are flying - Tony is ONLY scoring, BUT NOT RUNNING THE OFFENSE, sorry, and this is shoen greatly in his Tendex Index and stat as having almost FLAT spead (I wrote about that so many times), meaning he isn't providing deep anything else (in the overall picture), BUT JUST SCORING...The stat doesn't lie...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've been dreaming about Jermaine ONeal since Robinson retired........screaming it at the TV as Robinson did his last post-game interview.
What happened that offseason almost made me go postal......
WTF were the Spurs thinking going after Jason Kidd?!?!?!
Imagine if we hadn't gotten our caught in our zipper after the 2003 season?
The Suns don't run a motion offense. Learn some b-ball. Nash dominates the ball. That's why he avgs 11 assists. If no one but Parker handled the ball in the half court, his assists would be way up. If there isn't a fast break opportunity, Parker dumps the ball to a big at the top of the arc, and goes into his cuts.
When did all of these new, Parker-hating Argies show up? I'm about to go all Sequ on their asses...
Good question, I don't know what got their panties in a bunch.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)