I might believe that if you put in in a gif with a glowing font.many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed incon uously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition.
many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed incon uously ahead of time, remotely ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building. This makes it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition.
Not quite the same. Ask mouse if he'll do it for you.
If people aren't listening to my theories, then maybe shouting them in eye-searing hot pink will do the trick.
So now the fact that there were low occupance rates at the hijacked planes proves a conspiracy? Again, through as much against the wall as you can in the hope that some will stick. Classic conspiracy theorist.
And dan is accusing other posters of drinking to much vodka?
You are beyond hope, danny-boy
Wow a new time stamp.
Yep. That's definitely the WTC. No doubt about it.
$1200.00 for that? Yep, you took it up the ass on that deal.
Preofessional looking time stamp. no way that could be faked.
D for the new troll name. Caps are all wrong.
A+ for showing the blast-proof, fire-proof, thermite-proof rubber band though.
I wonder what C-3 means....
thousands of pounds is nothing in building that big
I like how the timestamp is losslessly compressed while the rest of the video is lossy. Obviously post-production.
Anyways, are you done spewing garbage? At least Dan and co don't flat out lie and create fake evidence when they talk about 9/11 conspiracy.
Here's a better photograph showing that the larger piece of debris probably came from an American Airlines jet fuselage -- and, most likely, from the area bearing one of the letters in "American."
If you look at the picture you will notice the white stripe around the large aircraft is around a foot and a half, The piece they say came from the so called aircraft that hit the pentagon clearly shows the white stripe around 4 inches.
Also, if you look at the white stripe on the larger aircraft you will see it has a blue stripe on top of it. In the piece they found there is no blue stripe to be found..
In addition, the small piece has many small holes in it that clearly shows it came from a much smaller aircraft that uses those type of rivets.
So what hit the Pentagon was not a Boeing 757 nor a missile, it was a smaller aircraft?
Hmmmm . . . Ok.
Nice, Mouse is making a good case that maybe it wasn't AA 77.
Here is the seating capacity for Flight 77 that struck the Pentagon...
Remember, this plane disappeared from radar for a time and was flying without transponders.
mouse is making a good case that the markings on the piece of debris are one of the letters in 'American.'
What letter would that be? The rivet pattern makes that hard to believe.
Assuming the rivets run cir ferentially, I believe you are looking at the letter 'n' from the starboard side.
I should sell this to Alex Jones.
That's exactly what it is. Anyone with half a brain can see it. But Mouse wants to play his little games.
Here's an eyewitness who has no problems saying, "contact me if you have any questions." Here's your chance Mouse. Contact him and see if his account doesn't convince you of the REAL truth.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/F77penta13.html
You have to admit, the video skit was pretty funny. At least I thought so.That's exactly what it is. Anyone with half a brain can see it. But Mouse wants to play his little games.
wrong find another letter.
The letter N only has one curve and there is a red [] notch on the left hand side. plus the letters have a thinner white stripe then what you see. You guys will just keep finding different letters until you can prove your point that will be meaningless once the actually footage is released. what ever helps you sleep at night fellas.
As for the man placing the shape charge, that was to show how they are placed. I never said that man was inside the WTC.
More videos!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
