Reply With Quote
Kind of an ironic comment considering how many threads there are dedicated to basically the same subject.
I've already conceeded that there was enough Kinetic Energy presented by the upper falling floors to theoretically crush the remaining lower floors under the right conditions, so why beat a dead horse?
Kind of an ironic comment considering how many threads there are dedicated to basically the same subject.
That type of sulfur wouldn't ellicit sulfidation attack.... only reduced sulfur species like mercaptans, H2S or elemental sulfur could do that...
Some fireproofing materials, especially those from the 60's and 70's, contained reduced sulfur species... In fact it was considered a contaminant. Not knowing exactly what brand of fireproofing insulation was used on the WTC beams keeps me from speculating, but if I had to guess I would venture to say it contained suficient sulfur to promote sulfidation.
And nbadan before you conjecture past your audience consider this: one of the units that I tend to in the refinery is the sulfur plant. No one here knows more about sulfur than I do.
Last edited by Phenomanul; 05-01-2007 at 08:44 PM.
Where did this re ed thermite theory come from? Thermite is such a niche incindiary, there is no reason to choose this of all explosives. The theory is needlessly complicated when you look at the ridiculous amount of thermite you would need to melt columns. You'd be better off just using plain gunpowder and concussive force than complex melting.
Or a plane.
A plane?
What a stupid theory!
Where's the fun if it were simply planes with terrorist pilots who brought down the WTC?
How could inquisitive minds burn the amount of brain cells needed to come up with convoluded theories about explosives and missiles, if it was just commercial airplanes what brought down the towers?
chump, you're nuts!
Waaaaay over their heads dude.
They still can't get the basic laws of motion down, so high-falutin' stuff like this might as well be in Chinese.
I must have missed that one.
Ok then.
It's a plane, no it's Superman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Haven't we had enough of the arguments on WTC and 9/11?
Or we just going to go on feeding the animals?
Link please.
Link please
But you've said there was explosives on every floor, that that's what we all saw was the explosion of every floor.
Way to own yourself in your own argument.
I imagine in the entire history of the building and all the contrsruction and retrofitting therein there has been a similar power down at least once.Let's not forget the unprecedented power-downs and reports of strange workers in both towers prior to 911.
And the power down and "strange" workers were in one half of one tower. Not both. Why do you try to sneak stuff like this in?
If just one person following this thread shows up at the next International A.N.S.W.E.R. rally, dan has done his job.But you've said there was explosives on every floor, that that's what we all saw was the explosion of every floor.
Way to own yourself in your own argument.
Remember, to him, it's all about "building coalitions based on ideas," not proving facts.
Oh well, at the present rate they will have the
freeway back open before this discussion is
concluded. Arnold said 10 days it will back in
operation. And WTC will be rebuilt in a few
years and on and on and on......
See...SEE!!! They are rushing the evidence away before anyone can analyze it!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
