So you're saying the Suns should've gone into the stands, instead? Not the floor, right?
Journal Entry, June 6, 2007
Our interesting study in group psychology continues, with the Spur-obsession of Suns fan showing no signs of abating. Even on the eve of the Finals, they are starting threads about the suspensions. It doesn't appear anything can shake this monkey off their collective back.
So you're saying the Suns should've gone into the stands, instead? Not the floor, right?
THE SUSPENIONS WOULD HAVE BEEN A JOKE! EXHIBITION GAMES MEAN NOTHING!
-Mars
Yes, the precedent for that means no suspensions, right?
I love asterisks -- they mean that the Spurs are champions and that the rest of basketball fandom can't figure out how that happened again.
It's so wonderful to watch my team piss off the "need to see bright, shiny objects frequently" crowd. Really, really great.
There's interpretation room there, or in the tunnels leading to the locker room. Likely, the stands gets them suspended. We know that going onto the playing floor did.
Of course, if pussy-boy decided to pursue Horry into the tunnels/locker room, he would have missed more than one game.
No, I'm saying they should have stayed on the bench.
Please do try to keep up here -- it's really not that hard.
Just another example of Amare's immaturity. We saw it all series.
Wasn't Amare just checking in?
Really, really fast?
So you agree that Bulls should have asterisks? Thanks for confirming.
NBA'S BRAWL RULE GOT IT RIGHT
May 18, 2007 -- SO every now and then a calamitous, scandalous, bench-clearing riot breaks out in an NBA game, the kind that spills into the stands and inspires ESPN and Fox Sports Net to break out and add to their Best of Violence reels.
And the media line up to condemn the NBA for its lack of foresight and crime prevention. We scream for a week, at least.
And then the NBA ins utes firmer, zero-tolerance rules, the kind designed to diminish the likelihood of such shameful episodes and to save the NBA from itself.
And then a hassle on a big stage breaks out - Monday's, for example. And then the NBA applies its no-exceptions rules.
And then, wouldn't ya know it, we do a flip-flop. We in the media condemn and ridicule the NBA for over-reacting, for excessive harshness, for depriving fans of the best players at an important time of year, for failing to factor in the human condition.
On ESPN, throughout the week, people who ostensibly follow the NBA - Stephen A. Smith and Jackie MacMullan, to name two - slammed the NBA's decision to suspend Amare Stoudemire and Boris Diaw one game each for leaving the Suns' bench to rush to the aid of Steve Nash. A travesty of justice!
They declared the NBA's application of its rules as ignorant to the dictates of "human nature" and as too severe, especially in Stoudemire's case, because he's a key player.
Well, for starters, if rushing from the bench to Nash's aid was instinctive, no matter how fast one arrived, he'd have gotten there in time to break up something that had already ended. Nash was lying on the deck, and the guy who put him there - Robert Horry - was done doing what he did. And Horry would have been left the only one penalized.
So there was nothing more that players rushing from the bench could have done than make matters worse. There never is.
And that's precisely what the NBA's rule against leaving the bench was designed to do - prevent bad scenes from growing worse. And Monday, it worked.
But instead of "Hooray for the NBA!," we turn on our all-sports network to hear the league bashed for its failure to recognize, of all things, human nature.
If rushing from the bench simply was a by-product of human nature, then how do we explain the inaction of the rest of the Suns' bench? And why didn't the Spurs' bench deploy?
As opposed to the big joke the Western Conference playoffs became?
Except Mack won a championship. I also can't expect you to know I dislike most of what UT-Austin stands for.
Went right over your head.
I am a Longhorn. For years, aggies and Sooners sent around the pick of Mack at a press conference with nothing in his hands, representing all of his trophies. There was also the one with the empty trophy case. The Amare pic reminded me of that. Do I need to keep explaining?
You keep saying that.
I do not think you know what it means.
Suns getting swept by the Jazz wouldn't have made it anymore exciting
Apparently, it's really really really really really hard.
This post was so idiotic that I chose to answer in a special way.
![]()
-Mars
Thread starter:
SammyDavis
Believe.
Position: Pass-First Guard
Team: Boston Celtics
vBookie Cash: $500
Post Count: 3
---------
Shred, you lose.
Damn, it sucks to lose. But I'll take 3 out of 5. Certainly beats 0 for 40 or whatever.
Journal Entry--ADDENDUM
Five pages later, the obsession continues. Fascinating.
Shred, you can go back to Arizona fans.com now. I hear it's time for their nightly circle jerk. You don't want to miss out.
Because the Phoenix players were stupid, and ran on the playing floor.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)