Could anybody post a RATIONAL, BASKETBALL KNOWLEDGE based explanation of why they think Oberto is better than Scola?
Are you aware that, with FIBA rules, and playing in stronger teams, Scola's stats, intangibles and relevance are QUITE HIGHER than what Oberto got in the same leagues (Spanish league and Euroleague)?
You can check www.acb.com and www.euroleague.net there you will find a lot of info to verify. Scola is year after year, leader of a team that gets into Euroleague Final Four, perennial MVP candidate of compe ions, and even more of a lock in the starting five of such compe ions, the level of performance of Oberto wasn't near.....
Yuo cold say NBA is different...ok, why is it different? because NBA IS MORE PHYSICAL, so I'd ask.....Given FIBA rules where strenght, speed and 1 on 1 habilities are FAR LESS important than in NBA, and Scola took noticeable advantage over Oberto there....
How come Scola would be in disadvantage against Oberto in a more physical league....when you know the fact that he's younger, FASTER, MORE ATHLETIC (remember the huge blcok against Jermaine ONeal if you think he has the same vertical as Oberto), with better mid-range shoot, and equal in size and Basketball IQ as Oberto?
What physical (NBA) advantage would Oberto have over Scola to make you suppose that Oberto is better suited for NBA?
Could anybody explain it to me?
and this is for everyone, not just for you, Whottt.....
PS: LEt me confirm again that I don't hate Oberto, I consider him a great, intelligent player....I ask this because I don't understand why Spurs fan fail to realize that Scola is like saying Oberto++....¿why don't you get it?

Reply With Quote
