Reply With Quote
Wow.
I'm just... speechless.
That blog looks like the work of an adult, not a 13 year old.
Wow.
I'm just... speechless.
I know you have got other internet posters on your side but you are not as right as you think you are. I am not saying there is no give and take though.
You probably should have just stayed with your original username.
Witty deduction. However did you draw that correct conclusion? I will meet you at a GTG and tell you there. As for now, my regular username might bias your reply.
I don't really care who you are. Make an argument if you're going to make one.
Fact is, you created a new name because of whatever connection we've apparently had in the past. I don't NEED to be right here. Make an argument and sway me if you're so inclined. Or don't.
I don't really care one way or the other.
My argument is unless you can prove 100% that the lady with no morals knew she would cause the tragic result, how can you put all the blame on her? Shouldn't a proportional amount of blame go to the one who actually did the harm?
So I guess, yeah, you should have stayed with your original username.
I give her the no morals label because she blatantly admitted she wanted to screw with a teenager.
SCREW WITH A TEENAGER. An adult who went all out for SIX weeks to SCREW WITH A TEENAGER.
Who in their right mind does that?
I'm sure she didn't want the girl to commit suicide, but her actions produced those results. I'm sure the three guys indicted in the homicide of Sean Taylor didn't want to kill him, but their actions produced those results.
The mom knew the girl had a history of mental illness and acted as a predator to a weaker prey. Two humans, one adult and one child, in that scenario.
Yes, she's ed up.
I agree and disagree with you. First of all the lady has 0 morals and is a terrible person. However, your analogy to the gunmen in Sean Taylor's case falls short because they actually committed the act. Agreed, what she did was horrible, but unless you can show me that she knew for a fact the girl would do this because of her irreparable behavior, then you have to apportion the blame.
In the report, she stated that she felt the hoax “contributed to Megan’s suicide, but she did not feel ‘as guilty’ because at the funeral she found out Megan had tried to commit suicide before.”
How much percentage-wise would you say this little girl deserves the blame?
By quoting that, I think you are agreeing with me. No?
I would rather not speculate on numbers. My intention was not to defend the big woman on the left. I only wanted to show that one users opinion didn't deserve the backlash it received.
Oh wait..Majority, dang! You're insane dude.But I still think majority of the blame should be with the adolescent.
No, I'm not agreeing with you.
The fact that she felt guilty before she knew there was a previous attempt means she had the knowledge that something like suicide could happen, yet failed to control her own petty emotions for the sake of a teenager with a mental illness.
This is just unbelievable. The audacity of this woman!! If she actually goes through with the charges and gets money for this... I don't know what is wrong with this world. The judge should flat out slap this lady.I guess I was dead on with the fat observation, Lori Drew on the left:
Get this: The Drews are pressing charges for destruction of property against the Meiers for destroying the foosball table. And they had the audacity to have the Meiers over their house on several occasions before they were outed as having a hand in Megan's death.
They have this story in People magazine, and when I read about the foosball table I wondered if they would do this but quickly dismissed it thinking "there's no way they'd actually do that". And then I read this. Unbelievable.
Good luck with that, whomever you are.
Could happen does not equate to being the direct cause, Mr. Blaze. I feel understandable emotions are getting the best of you, but assuming your line of thinking is true, how, in this cir stance or another similar, can you direct all blame to someone who didn't actually cause the harm?
I thought it was understood I had already accomplished my objective. Even if luck was still needed, your retorts have certainly fallen short of the conviction you had earlier so I already feel my assertion has been validated.
What exactly of bdictjames' opinion are you asking me to agree with?
Is it the "can't blame the evil " part?
Or is it the "If she knew it would hurt this girl's feelings" part?
I'm not asking you to agree with the quoted opinions, nor am I endorsing the aforementioned user's stance. I am merely stating all blame cannot be placed on the larger woman in the left of the photo.
Feel what you wish.
I don't feel I have to re-assert what's already been stated in this thread. My emotions at stupid opinions tend to rescind as I'm continually hit with them until I simply reach a point where I don't care anymore or care to argue about it anymore.
And frankly, you've been polite, so I have, too.
I still wish you would have had the conviction of your opinion (or quest or whatever you're on) to simply stay on your own persona.
Then state it.
I'm not going to change your opinion, nor bdictjames', nor are you likely to change mine.
You want to know why I'm (apparently) calmer, I'm simply tired of arguing the same ing thing over and over.
You want my opinion, it's a few pages back.
I'll be happy to let the rest of the internets make their own judgments for the time-being.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
