Reply With Quote
Worst trade ever practically. Parker is too young to trade for a 35 yr old albino. No thanks
No... Kidd for parker doesn't work for me. Kidd is a gamble... I don't like to to gamble on the spurs' chances. Parker provides speed and chemistry to the spurs - i wound not change that just to accommodate kidd (and his effort to get of NJ)
Kidd maybe a a walking triple double but his numbers never brought championships to any team he's on. Parker on the other hand did it three times. So the "if it's not broken don't fix" it policy still stick.
If you want a real change to happen, bring back Mahinmi into the rotation. We could use another big man.
Worst trade ever practically. Parker is too young to trade for a 35 yr old albino. No thanks
This thread is not the worst ever seen.....
Trade T.Parker+Elson+ Barry for J.Kidd AND Manu+ Udoka+ Horry for V.Carter
And Holt's Cat said " Post the worst topic in the world or i'll eat your soul....."
And i post the first thing that came to my head, just so happened to be, the Worst post in the World it was the Worst post in the World
This is not the worst post in the world, no, this is just a Tribute.....
Last edited by colargol; 02-16-2008 at 04:28 AM.
I can't wait for the Trade Deadline to pass so I won't have to be subjected to the braindead morons going off the deep end in this thread. Please let it come soon!
The difference now is that you could get a very capable Kidd for the next two postseasons and be able to sign a max free agent as early as 2009.
That's not tempting to anyone as Duncan approaches his mid-30s?
Question.
stupid thread, downgrading this forum. too bad.
I guess I'll have to spell it out in bright shiny colors with pictures next time.
The fact that you homers prefer to count on getting #1 picks in the draft is unsettling.
Is your idea of retirement planning scratch-off tickets?
*yawn*
your posts are beginning to reach "sequ" levels of predictability and boredom...
Answer the question.
Front office can't sign anyone good.
Can't/won't trade for anyone good.
Tank a season and pray we get lucky?
Look at the Celtics. They've only gotten "back" after years of mediocrity and trading their future for a shot now.
If you are unwilling to trade for talent, what's the plan to stay good as Duncan approaches his mid-30s?
Please don't say "build around Parker."
They haven't needed to trade or sign a player who can be a top 3 player on their team because...they already have their top 3 players.
Look at the Celtics, they've made a ton of moves, have had a superstar named Paul Pierce on their team for a decade and haven't won a le in that period.
Why are the Celtics a model for the Spurs to look to?
The Celtics have not been good, because they did not get Duncan.
Credit the Celtics for doing everything in their power to become a serious contender again.
Imagine if the Spurs had to build around Pierce.
We can't make trades.
We send away our draft picks.
We can't get stars to play here even with max money.
Right?
So the Spurs got Duncan and put a championship level supporting cast around him. Problem solved.
I'm still curious to see this list of nine point guards that are supposedly better than Parker.
Is Stephon Marbury on the list? Chris Whitney?
Let's help the ' out with the top 3...
1. Jason Kidd
2. Gary Payton
3. Chris Whitney
Is Gary Payton still alive, and if so, doesn't he violate the 'over 30' role of Casper's?
Question.
But he's a superstar because he's Gary Payton and Gary Payton is a superstar. Besides, he's African-American and sometimes glib.
Marbury and Whitney were killing Parker statistically at the time you homers were felating Parker. I never said either was a better player.
All 12 of these PGs are having statistically better seasons than Parker and I am going by season averages (relax with the Parker's been injured rhetoric):
Chris Paul
Baron Davis
Chauncey Billups
Allen Iverson
Steve Nash
Dwayne Wade
Deron Williams
Jason Kidd
Jose Calderon
Mo Williams
Monta Ellis
Brandon Roy
Food for thought.
I said Parker is somewhere in the top ten.
2002 called and wants its take back.
Make fun of me now for wanting the Spurs to get some help for scraps, sort've like the Bibby trade that was just made.
You mean, get some help that are scraps...
Build around Stromile.
Hardee-har-har, guys.
So if I get this right, you all are in favor of doing exactly [I]nothing[?i] to imporve the team.
Stay pat, let the team get older, and pray for a good free agent signing in the future.
But I thought you don't trust the front office to bring anyone god in via free agency?
Parker is not worse than most of those guys.
Also, not sure how Monta Ellis has had a better year stats wise than Tony Parker. That's the first player I bothered to check Ghost's assertion with.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
