That's actually worse in a lot of ways. You'd think ac ulating all of that wealth would have entailed exhibiting some sort of restraint or tact along the way.That's billionaire clown to you, sparky.
His "Sideshow Bob" routine is tired and needs to be taken to the nearest recycle facility.
Manu's been tired for the last two or three games; don't even try to make yourself believe that Kidd can defend him. He would have needed at least 25 shots to get 30 points the way he was playing. Harris would have been able to take advantage of Parker not being back to full speed.
Bass' success against Duncan isn't surprising. He's a matchup problem and when he hits shots and the Spurs play bad defense he's going to score a little bit.
To get back to the discussion, Bowen fouled Terry a few plays before the T and it wasn't called. Terry ed about it for a while. I'll go back and see if it was an elbow, because Bowen might have said something to Terry who then referred to the elbow from three plays before as justification for losing his cool, which he might actually do because he's a dumbass.
This is Jason Terry of the nut-punch calling Bowen dirty... uh-huh.
Terry is a dirty, whining little biatch.
Like that play on Wade during the finals. However, the "other" angle showed that Wade was indeed fouled.
I agree, we should all wait for the Bowen elbow to show up in a couple of years.
Just more evidence of the Avery, Cuban crybaby trickle down effect. How else to ghetto thugs like Jason Terry get turned into whinny es.
OFFICIAL MAV-MOBILE:
BTW--
This guy is pissed at Jason Terry
Says JT stole his diaper---
Bowen was not even near Jason Terry during the play (they were really far away from each other), perhaps he hit him as he was walking back to the other end? If any of you still have the game recorded you can see that it could not have happened DURING that play, so if it happened at all, it was at another time.
Someday, Jason Terry and Amare Stoudemire are destined to be teammates. You just know it.
Don't even try to make yourself believe that Manu will shoot 60% the entire season.
good stuff. Devin Harris and DeSagana Diop, our two best players until we traded them away. Dirk and Josh are scrubs.
Not sure where in your ass you found that stat. Manu shot 10-33 the last two games. Does Kidd get credit for the shooting against Atlanta too?
Nice strawman. Harris + Diop > Kidd + nobody. Should be so simple even you can understand it.
good stuff. Devin Harris and DeSagana Diop, our two best players until we traded them away. Dirk and Josh are scrubs.
Before the Atlanta game, he had been shooting 60% from the field over his last 5 or 6 games. He was WC Player of the Week or Month, right?
Dirk, Josh and Jet are the biggest Spurs killers, followed by Devin at #4, then Stackhouse at #5, Damp at #6 and Diop at #7.
We gave up our fourth and seventh-most important players when it comes to the Spurs. There are going to be times when we miss Harris' speed and Diop's shotblocking, but I was pleased to see that the Mavs are still going to a to play for the Spurs and any series between our teams is going at least 6 and probably 7 games.
Here is what Tony Parker has done to the Mavs since the beginning of that playoff series two years ago: 19 points and 4 assists per game. And here is what Devin has done against the Spurs: 12 points and 3 assists per game. And maybe you're forgetting that in Game 7, Parker abused Devin: 24 points, 5 assists and 1 turnover to 2 points, 0 assists and 5 turnovers for Harris. Harris has improved offensively since that time, but the speed is still the same.
As for Diop, he's living off that Game 7 overtime against Duncan when he sat the bench the entire regulation while Timmy was gassed. The guy who banged on him all night and helped wear him down is still here. Dampier is no Duncan stopper, nobody is, but he does what one can against him as well as can be done.
Too lazy to look it up but I think if you look at the games the Mavs won against the Spurs vs the games the Mavs lost, a deciding factor was Harris having big games in many of the wins.
Except, as you saw last night, without Harris that punk Terry sees different defenses and is much less effective, and now with Udoka and Bowen , Howard is much less effective too.
Howard's been sucking for the past 3 weeks because of a lower back contusion. That was nothing new. Terry is going to continue to be effective as a spot-up shooter for Kidd. Dirk shot 5-15. Manu and Tony had a poor shooting night, so did those guys. Thanks for playing though.
Speed kills - as with Parker so with Harris. That has been a problem with the Spurs when they play the Mavs - Harris's speed and the D Diop plays against TD. Dirk/Howard/JET and even Stackhouse will get their points but take away the impact of Harris and Diop and the game is different. I believe that a Kidd lead Mavs team is less of a threat to the Spurs than if they had Harris and Diop. The Mavs have absolutely no player to defend TD. Period! Stuff the Jamal crap, too. It ain't happening.
I'm kind of surprised you're the only one in this thread that has asked this question because I was thinking the same thing. After the foul Terry was calm as can be. He didn't explode until at least 5 seconds after the foul and then ran up into Bruce's face. If someone takes an elbow that's not going to be his normal reaction. I thought Bruce had just insulted his mom or something. The elbow argument is ridiculous.
You just have to believe that Bruce said something to set him off as he was walking away. All it would have taken was one word. Its the only thing that makes sense here.
Bruce probably said something to him.
I'm sorry, but when has Jason Terry been a Spurs killer? Josh Howard doesn't historically do that well against the Spurs. Dirk only became a Spurs killer since the introduction of Smallball©. I know you, as a Mavs fan, don't understand the importance of defense, as it doesn't really show up as a stat, but Harris can keep Parker out of the paint, and the Spurs are most effective when the guards are penetrating. Diop is a shot blocker with quick feet, exactly the type of player Duncan has problems with.
I've said it before, but it's worth one more try: The Spurs didn't play that well and won a close game they normally would have lost by 20. If the Spurs play well against the Mavs you'll see the difference.
He must have. The no-call foul a few plays earlier was Howard, not Terry. I think Kidd heard whatever Bowen said because he wasn't too happy with Bowen either. The only elbow might have been from Damon when he tried to draw that charge.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
