I prefer to have my own take on Obama's speech. No offense to Thomas Sowell. You can find positive takes on his speech as well as negative.
I'm still supporting Barack Obama.
If there is proof of this, it will prove to be extremely damaging to Obama's credibility.The cable news journalists who are playing the tapes of those sermons were not there. The tapes were on sale in the church itself. Obama knew that because he had bought one or more of those tapes.
He would be caught in a lie.
He would be exposed as just another politician, the type of politician he says he is not.
I prefer to have my own take on Obama's speech. No offense to Thomas Sowell. You can find positive takes on his speech as well as negative.
I'm still supporting Barack Obama.
If Hillary wins the nomination I may vote for McCain.
McCain and Obama's platforms are extremely different.
How can you vote for McCain?
Is this proof that you're just being swept up in the Obamamentum?
![]()
More evidence Democrats don't deserve to win in November . . .
I don't know how else to get it through to that pea brain of yours.
I'm not a Democrat.
Why would I vote for someone I don't believe in?
JoeChalupa voting for McCain if Obama doesn't get the nomination doesn't make sense. However, me not voting for someone I don't believe in makes all the sense in the world.
Your not voting at all doesn't make any sense to me. The not voting for someone you don't believe does, but simply not voting doesn't.
I've had said many times that I like John McCain and could see me voting for him. And I do believe in John McCain as an honorable man. Much more so than President Bush.
Think outside the box.
The best candidate deserves to win.
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!
So, you're saying that I should vote for someone that I don't believe in just for the sake of voting?
That makes no sense at all.
No, but I have been swept up by the fact that as an American I have the right to vote for which ever candidate I choose to and don't have to explain myself to you or anyone else.
But I find myself doing it on message boards all the time.![]()
Does this?
A write-in candidate is a candidate in an election whose name does not appear on the ballot, but for whom voters may vote nonetheless by writing in the person's name.
![]()
![]()
![]()
That was funny.
You're right, everyone has that right.
But, I also have the right to not to vote for someone I don't believe in.
I concur.I've just never missed a predidential election since I turned of voting age. That is all.
If my candidate doesn't get the nomination, there's no point to write her name in.
It's a pointless gesture, akin to using a spoon to take the water out of a sinking ship.
This would be my first.
Joe, you consider Obama an honorable man? How is he
honorable? Explain this to me.
(nods) I see. Maybe Sheryl will be her running mate.![]()
Heh, the pundits seem to disagree.
Although the BBC guy I read this morning seemed to think that his honesty will "kill" his campaign.
Actually, I saw much of the speech and thought it was pretty darn brilliant as well.
Quite frankly, it completely erased any lingering doubts I had about supporting him.
Yep one more. I watched. But didn't really listen to
what he really said. He was brilliant. The birds sang
louder and the world was just a nicer place to live in
since he spoke. Yeah, you bet. Wonder how his
old racist Grandmother feels, who loved him so much.
Obviously all white folks are racist.
Well for one thing, he didn't completely throw the preacher in question "under the bus".
That would have made me really leery.
He did say what he thought about what the guy said, in an honest, thoughtful way.
(shrugs)
We all have our crazy uncles, and although I don't agree with Uncle Buster that "they are rustlin' up them crazy cows from Mexica through the valley, I know 'cuz I SEEN 'em", I still love the old coot.
He could have easily simply totally thrown the guy under the bus in order to get elected. That would have been what a lot of critics said should have happened, but would lack, in my opinion, integrity.
He proved that he is willing to take the hits for not totally abondoning a guy he has known for 20 years.
This and several other incidents have reinforced his words (and I am paraphrasing here) "I will not do ANYTHING to win this election, I will win it on my terms and in a way to be proud of."
Good gawd, he is the first guy in a long time that might actually mean what he says.
Huckabee chimes in on the Wright controversy on Morning Joe (via Daily Kos)
Yeah isn't he wonderful. He keeps the old guy who hates
white folks, but throws his loving grandmother under the
bus. What a guy.
That isn't what he said, and on some level you know that.
Ray, you're a good egg. I like ya.
But when it comes to Dems or Republicans you simply have too much confirmation bias to be credible when it comes to analysing these things, no offense.
Dems, no matter who they are, can do/say no right, and Republicans, no matter who they are, can do no wrong.
That kind of thing is the very definition of confirmation bias.
No RG, you know what I noticed more than anything,
not that he threw his Grandmother under the bus, but
that he acknowledged she loved him and help raise him
and made him cringe.........but not once, not one damn
time did he acknowledge he loved her or respected her.
That is something I noticed. Did you?
He didn't throw his grandmother under the bus either. He had the nuts to talk about her as if she were (gasp) human.
He simply pointed out the contradictions and problems that remain in race relations in the country, even to this day, even in people he loves deeply.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)