God no; the last thing I want is you people flooding my inbox.
Yes
No
God no; the last thing I want is you people flooding my inbox.
Protip: It has nothing to do with your inbox.
needle exchange for addicts? This isn't anything that excites me one way or another. However, if it keeps the ing idiots out of the emergency rooms with hepa is, aids, etc. then fine, by all means give the morons clean needles.
I'm leaning towards yes.
WC, why do you ask for facts if you're just going to dismiss them when confronted with them?![]()
![]()
![]()
That's pretty much the reason. Cheaper to just let them kill themselves than spread diseases all around.
them. When are we going to stop financing these dip s? Let them die. Nature finds a way to off these clowns to keep them from breeding and humans come along and thwart it.
Whoever is ing a needle sharing addict needs to go as well.
Dude, the lightbulb thing is A#1 classic comedy gold.
It doesn't get more illustrative of ed right wing hysteria than a chain email about how the gubmint is coming to git yer litebubs.
How the does someone forget about that funny?
As for this thread... it was the only thing that came up when one searchs "teen pregancy rates".
I only remembered dimwit saying something truly, monumentally stupid like this, and a search engine did the rest.
One of the things that makes stuff like this stand out in my head, is that I actually dig down for actual data behind claims. I prefer, unlike you right wing propaganda regurgitators to have opinions based on things like facts and science, with reasonable conclusions. When you do that, things tend to actually stick around. Being informed is like that. Try it sometime.
I see so much of what you believe as self-righteous bull and things that you read on some website that gives you all warm fuzzies about being superior to other people, that when I find stoopid , it sticks in my mind.
Call it my confirmation bias. Call it the fact that I have a pretty good memory all things told.
Whatever you want to believe to make yourself feel better about being a hack, and the other right wing hack crazy uncles that you want to kid yourself are rare on your side of the isle.
Sorry to be the one to burst your bubble. Aiken isn't as rare as you want us to believe.
You didn't really read anything in thethread other than the le, did you?
(sigh)
self-righteous bull judgmentalism
Speak of the devil.
Protested any rape victims today?
or maybe you finally discoverd the difference between legal and moral?
There was another thread we expanded this discussion on. Your old link is not longer valid. I will still contend that unplanned teen birth rates are higher in recent history than in the 60's and 70's. I have not been able to find complete data that specifies unplanned. Any idea where that other thread is?
Random, consider something please. These studies you find are including marriage age adults. Does it break down how many are married and how many are not? How many are actually unplanned pregnancies?
Here is my contention, poorly worded before. I say that there are less pregnancies to unmarried high school girls in the 70's than today. I will add the specificity of unmarried and of high school age. We can add Jr. high if you like. Stop with the studies that include married women and those who are 19 and 20 years old.
If everyone were like you, they'd still be prosecuting witches in Salem.
It's your premise, YOU ing prove it. Even if RG were to provide those numbers, you'd only move the goalposts again.
Not my job to support your statement.
If you can't find the data, then logic dictates a rejection of your statement.
Well, you are the one worried about this four year old argument. I'm not. Are you still butt-hurt from me catching you on your confusion between ozone and smog you never admitted?
ing dolt.
Let me google it for your dumb ass.
http://www.google.com/search?q=teen+pregnancy+rates
So let's see what the most current reports show.
Why Have Teen Pregnancy Rates Dropped?Something quite remarkable has happened to teenage pregnancy rates in the past few years. They’ve reached a three-decade low, down by 40 percent since 1990. Teen births and abortions also have fallen respectively by one-third and one-half.
Better sex education, though a sensible practice, doesn’t deserve the full credit. Teen pregnancy is often blamed on some states’ promotion of school-based “abstinence-only” education, which neglects contraception. But the recent drops in teen pregnancy were present across the country, in states with comprehensive sex education (like New Jersey, where annual teen pregnancy rates dropped from 11 percent to 7 percent) and those without it (like Texas, where the rate is higher but fell by about the same relative amount). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that 40 percent of teens didn’t use a condom at last intercourse, and that sorry figure doesn’t vary much by state. And between 1995 and 2010, depressingly, the substantial percentage of teens who used no contraception at all remained unchanged nationwide, indicating that teens didn’t suddenly start using birth control.
Part of the explanation is that teenagers are waiting longer to have sex. According to federal surveys of teenage girls, 49 percent reported they were virgins in 1995, but 57 percent said they were in 2010. (The trend was even more pronounced among black teens, whose rate of abstinence rose from 40 percent to 54 percent.) However, these modest changes don’t fully explain the dramatic drop in teen pregnancy.
Advertisement
So what really changed? Even though the same proportion of teens has used birth control during the past 20 years, the key to lower pregnancy rates has been a shift from condom use alone to more effective hormonal methods like the pill. It turns out that not all contraception is the same. No matter how well-educated they are, teens who do use birth control can’t reliably use condoms every time. To be sure, condoms prevent sexually transmitted diseases and are an important public health tool. But we now realize they should never, ever be the sole method of birth control for teens. They find condoms too much of hassle to use time after time—so they don’t.
A new study shows how to reduce them even more.
By Darshak Sanghavi|Posted Tuesday, July 31, 2012, at 11:30 AM ET
http://www.slate.com/articles/health..._to_iuds_.html
Give young girls free birth control pills, and you get another predictable result.
Keep looking for data supporting your stupid ideas, by all means. My search was not lengthy or detailed by any stretch. I was merely curious to see what was there.
Shockingly enough, your idea about what the country is/was is based on nothing but what makes you feel good. Emotion over data and pragmatism.
I will consider it.
I consider it a blindingly stupid obfuscation on your part, of the kind that Cosmored tries to pull when you corner him in his bull .
Your ing mediocre mind grasping at irrelevant straws that do nothing to change the context under which the data as we know it exists.
How many of these teens are 19 and 20 years old, or married? More people married right after HS four decades ago than today, and that is using data 3 decades back.
You get to be a real asshole when you get frustrated.
Must be that you cannot defend against what I said.
The problem you have here is that I freely admit when I am wrong.
THat particular case was you hanging your hat on a spelling mistake, when cornered.
JUST LIKE YOU ARE DOING HERE, YOU DUMB ASS.
I am not frustrated.
I'm just tired of your stupidity.
Quit responding to my posts and find some data to support your moronic thesis, you ing hack.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)