Hmm. So the variant "Truther" arguments seem to hinge upon the (slight) possibility of explosives being planted in the Towers, by people working for either (a) Bush, or (b) the Illuminati. Any other likely culprits?
No one saw explosives being planted, and no one is talking.
The Truther case is not convincing. For it to adequately explain what went on, they will need to explain who put the explosives in the building, how they did it, and why. You will have to explain how the explosives were never detected by anyone prior to the collapse. Then you will need to explain why they would even bother with aircraft when explosives would do the trick by themselves. Your explanation will then have to account for (a) no eyewitnesses and (b) no testimony.
On the other hand, non-"truthers" have a plausible explanation (aircraft hit the buildings at full speed, the fuel burned hot and caused structural collapse). We have millions of eyewitnesses. We have "suspects" who have already confessed (jihadists trained here and overseas) and we have a motive.

Reply With Quote
