1993 = relevant history
1988 = ancient history
Chris doesn't even try anymore.
Citing ancient history
1993 = relevant history
1988 = ancient history
Chris doesn't even try anymore.
it's like we're finishing each other's
She was picked by Clinton...
What about Reagan?
Typical whataboutery.
20+ years = vintage aka ancient
@ Trumpers wanting everyone oposing or overseeing a case regarding Trump be recused or fired.
agreed.
how long ago was she nominated by bill?
StillWithHers don't care about corruption as long as DRUMPF gets it!
You agree it's ancient history
Clinton was more recent.
Let us proceed.
So you agree Gorka's Clinton ding was ancient history.
Let us proceed.
More recent than Reagan plus no reason ties to Reagan would be a conflict of interest or whatever we are looking at here. Reagan does not give this person credibility in this instance.
Anyway, it's not a recuse-worthy conflict and you and Nazi Gorka are idiots if you think it is.
Why do you keep using Culburn's ? You aren't nearly as funny or clever as he is. You aren't even a homeless homeless man's version of him. It just make you look dumber than you already are.
What a dummy
Go back upstairs and grab your shine box.
Trash white red neck got
2/90=14% uneducated pos
Trump crew really needs Cully to come back and rescue them. They are lost without him.
He was carrying them kicking and screaming before.
Umm no one's talking about Hillary. I mean, other than you of course.
Stormy Daniels has conducted herself admirably. I've been impressed with her and her attorney.
Right, I'll just go back to ignoring your posts.
Mad no one's posting on his 6 hours old thread.
I gave him two pity posts on it.
"That may be, but at least I won't be unoriginal."
-Will Hunting
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)