Reply With Quote
When you're taking so much Ls you have to settle for a misquote.
TSA
When you're taking so much Ls you have to settle for a misquote.
When you're taking so much Ls you have to settle for a misquote.
Keep holding Ls, though. Thery suit you.
whatabout CNN?
committed a bad, uncorrected error, so ALL of EVERYTHING CNN says is bogus.
There are some Dems working for Mueller, so ALL of EVERYTHING Mueller does is bogus
You simple mother ers are so ing transparent
TSA thinks the media perception is more important than the actual legal proceedings.
You posted an article from their site the other day to support your argument. Little ho
Chuck is massively triggered.
Man, the TSA's and Chrises's of the world really dont want to let go of that minor story correction.
CNN pls admit your mistakes
Well yeah because they aren’t going well for his team
That was one clueless post. among so many.
That was one clueless post. among so many.
Or, if he’s called to testify in a different case, his lawyer asks for immunity in that case, too.
it's possible immunity was granted in this case to compel testimony. immunized witnesses risk contempt of court if they take the fifth.
Pretty sure this is the case for Weisselberg.
Might be big news, might not -- but the Trump Org is being investigated.
lol
Glenn Greenwald good now
there have been more than a few flubs by the so-called MSM, seldom in DJT's favor. CNN should retract or apologize if they goofed.
if the reporters lied about Lanny Davis NOT being a source, they should be fired, period.
Not going to defend CNN, I think they can handle that, but there's certainly the concept of on the record and off the record in news.
it's one thing to say the source is anonymous, another to rule out the person who IS the source.
I wasn't aware that was a journalistic commonplace, is it?
I will say, it can't be ruled out that Lanny Davis is lying now
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions