Not sure what you are referring to, but would be happy to discuss if you clarify.
The next Spurs dynasty will also be built through the draft in that we drafted Wemby. He is the core, just like Giannis is the core in MIL, Joker is the core in DEN, etc. Wemby isn't just a star, he's a superstar. I would compare it to BOS. Tatum and Brown were drafted, but pretty much the rest of the their main rotation was acquired via trade (Derrick, Jrue, Kristaps). They have some other guys they drafted (Prichard) who they drafted, and the Spurs will still have picks to add more players.
Of course its about the right price. I haven't seen anyone dispute that. And pretty much everyone in this thread has said no to Vassell + Castle. The only way I'd do that is if it includes no picks (but I'd rather keep Castle and send out some picks, personally). It's correct Fox is not a superstar. Neither are Mitc , Gobert, KAT, Bridges though. I'd put Fox in roughly the same category as those guys (Mitc and KAT mostly, I'd put him above Gobert and Bridges).
The last Superstar trade we saw was for a 34 year old KD on a team that was blowing it up. That cost PHX 5 FRPs plus Bridges and Cam Johnson. In the event a true Superstar comes available, are you ready to pay THAT kind of price? The Spurs don't even have a Bridges or a Cam Johnson to trade.
Who's making that argument? It seems like the only people making that argument are those out of touch with current NBA trade values and confusing a package of Vassell + 3 FRPs + SAC's swap (which is on the high end of what pretty much anyone has suggested in here) with a Superstar package. That is not a superstar package. There isn't a single superstar in this league you could acquire with that package (and when we say Superstar, we're talking about Shai, Jokic, Giannis, Luka, Curry, Lebron, KD, Wemby and maybe Tatum.)
The Spurs were a luxury tax team several times during the Duncan era. 2002, 2004, 2006, 2009, 2011. Their stars took pay cuts so the team could bring in more talent to compete. Kidd didn't not come here because of Tony, he didn't come here because his wife didn't want to move to San Antonio. The fact that aren't many teams who just bring in superstars outside of a handful of big markets is the point. San Antonio isn't one of those markets, so getting Top 25 talent isn't an avenue that is just always open to us.
You must be confusing me with someone else, because I never made that argument, so I was confused that when it was in response to me. I'm actually not even sure what you're talking about at this point? I don't have a "Fox wants to leave story" - I was responding to when you said "Don't pay big for someone you're comfortable walking in a couple years."
If history has shown trading a superstar price... why did you just say that you want to wait to trade for a superstar? Your words: "If you're shooting for the stars, just pay big and go for an established superstar." You're posts are really contradictory, but what I gather is that you just don't want to overpay for Fox. That's fine, none of us do.