yeah. I've noticed.
yeah. I've noticed.
Thank God for Blake/Chump, I;m never at the bottom for long, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
Your contest.
It doesn't change the dictionary. Try laughing maniacally at Mirriam-Webster/ Take your crusade there.
If we evolved from apes, how come I don't care for bananas?
Well I saw nothing here I haven't seen before. If you've ever delved into the theory of Evolution before there it was right up there.....again. I learned absolutely nothing I didn't already know.
The bottom line is real simple....
Without proof of the mul ude of different stages of evolution it's weak. What did the 2 milion years ago duck, look like compared to the 10 million years ago duck?
^ lazy fat ass
You might as well also start a thread about quantum physics and why you think it's bull because you don't understand it
Who doesn't understand it? Why keep acting like it's some really complex situation,when it's obviously not that at all?
If everything evolved from a lower life form where are all the stages involved to go from one stage of evolution to the other.....well?
Considering the available evidence, ducks really haven't changed much in that time period.
You mean you didn't know that?
lol book owner
Have you ever read a book about evolution, Avante?
Well over 90% of species that have existed are extinct. Every day species go extinct regardless of human intervention. The math alone suggests the emergence of new species. The fossil record, though fragmented, supports this, as well as the genetic record.
When you understand that fossilization requires very specific conditions, you will know that a mere fraction of a percent of deceased organisms will leave fossils behind. You can't realistically expect to find fossils from every generation or even species. There are likely species of dinosaurs for instance that existed and never left fossils behind.
Yeah most of the dead animals of yore are burning up in our cars and holding our sodas.
lol Jesus blogger misquoted Darwin.
"To suppose that the eye...could have been formed by natural selection seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree possible."
Jesus blogger lied.To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor, as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case; and if such variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated; but I may remark that, as some of the lowest organisms in which nerves cannot be detected, are capable of perceiving light, it does not seem impossible that certain sensitive elements in their sarcode should become aggregated and developed into nerves, endowed with this special sensibility.
Avante lied by extension.
Avante, you obviously haven't read one thing about evolution ever and can't discuss the concepts thereof at all. Why start any threads about it when all you do is declare your ignorance about it?
Why should anyone watch anything you post if you never read anything that makes the case for evolution?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)