Reply With Quote
Not of all Muslims. And if they were targeting ALL muslims just because they're Muslim it would be a civil rights/cons ution disaster.
My last post above was what Trump said TODAY, not from days ago.
Not of all Muslims. And if they were targeting ALL muslims just because they're Muslim it would be a civil rights/cons ution disaster.
I don't see what Trump stands to gain by not making himself clear about this. I guess he'll look like a pussy if he says anything supporting or reassuring Muslim US citizens.
If trump says anything in support of ANY Muslims, he risks confusing or angering his base of white christian supremacists. We ALL know what happens when the Black Hearts of Amerika gets their over-alls in a bunch. These godamn devils ALWAYS get violent.
lol
Thousands!
And Thousands!
The Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco does not appear to exist, and the FBI has not yet released murder statistics for 2015.
And the numbers included in the tweet highlighted by Trump do not reflect the numbers reported by the FBI in 2014.
The FBI reported in 2014 that 82 percent of murders with white victims were carried out by white people, while just under 15 percent were carried out by black people, according to theHuffington Post. And almost 90 percent of murders with black victims were committed by black individuals, while 7 percent were committed by white individuals.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...+%28TPMNews%29
#TruthsDontMatterDonnyT
Some of the things he's saying are starting to sound kind of wacky. I'm having a harder time defending this.
This guy shows the same intellectual due diligence as a racist uncle sharing "American Thinker" articles on Facebook, and some of y'all want him leading the country.
Would you please post the rest of the 2014 stats from the FBI? Blacks killed by whites/blacks/police and Whites killed by police?
The Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco does not appear to exist, and the FBI has not yet released murder statistics for 2015.
And the numbers included in the tweet highlighted by Trump do not reflect the numbers reported by the FBI in 2014.
The FBI reported in 2014 that 82 percent of murders with white victims were carried out by white people, while just under 15 percent were carried out by black people, according to theHuffington Post. And almost 90 percent of murders with black victims were committed by black individuals, while 7 percent were committed by white individuals.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...+%28TPMNews%29
#TruthsDontMatterDonnyT
Utilizing the Proper Hollywood Urban Gangsta Grip tbqfh in order to pander to the easily duped repug klown base. Gotta give'em props for that lolol
Stats on police shootings are reported on a voluntary basis, and many if not most law enforcement organizations aren't volunteering.
OK - What about the blacks killed by whites/blacks?
Are you asking me to post FBI statistics for 2014 for you?
I firmly believe you can use Google yourself.
That racist Trump tweet about blacks killing whites isn’t just false — it’s neo-Nazi propaganda
Donald Trump capped a week that found him flirting with fascism by sharing a blatantly false, racist graphic that apparently originated with a Hitler-admiring neo-Nazi.
The Republican presidential frontrunner tweeted an image Sunday afternoon that claimed 81 percent of white homicide victims are killed by blacks and 97 percent of black homicide victims were killed by other blacks.
So where did the image and the bogus statistics come from?
Blogger Charles Johnson, of Little Green Footballs, was unable to determine its source through a Google Image search or tineye.com — but he was able to find the earliest tweet using the graphic.
Non Dildo'd Goyim @CheesedBrit
10:17 PM - 21 Nov 2015
The account’s avatar is a modified swastika used as the symbol of the neo-Nazi German Faith Movement, and the account profile expresses admiration for Adolf Hitler: “A detester of any kind of sick perverted dildo waving marxism and liberalism,we Should have listened to the Austrian chap with the little moustache.”
The image was posted on the conservative Sexy Patriot account shortly before Trump shared it.
There’s no indication Trump was aware the graphic seems to have originated with a neo-Nazi, but a quick Google search should have revealed the statistics as inaccurate — and its racist suggestions are plainly obvious.
Trump supporters beat up a Black Lives Matter protester Saturday in Birmingham, Alabama, and the GOP candidate said afterward that the man was “so obnoxious and so loud” that “maybe he should have been roughed up.”
The Republican repeated his call to closely monitor or even close down U.S. mosques to fight terrorism, and he refused to rule out creating a database of American Muslims and expressed openness to the possibility of requiring them to carry special ID.
This isn’t the first time Trump has tweeted Nazi propaganda on his official social media account.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/that...e+Raw+Story%29
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...-trumps-polls/Lately, pundits and punters seem bullish on Donald Trump, whose chances of winning the Republican presidential nomination recently inched above 20 percent for the first time at the betting market Betfair. Perhaps the conventional wisdom assumes that the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Paris will play into Trump’s hands, or that Republicans really might be in disarray. If so, I can see where the case for Trump is coming from, although I’d still say a 20 percent chance is substantially too high.
Quite often, however, the Trump’s-really-got-a-chance! case is rooted almost entirely in polls. If nothing Trump has said so far has harmed his standing with Republicans, the argument goes, why should we expect him to fade later on?
One problem with this is that it’s not enough for Trump to merely avoid fading. Right now, he has 25 to 30 percent of the vote in polls among the roughly 25 percent of Americans who identify as Republican. (That’s something like 6 to 8 percent of the electorate overall, or about the same share of people who think the Apollo moon landings were faked.)
Even Bernie has polled as beating Donny T head-to-head.
While the Repugs hurt everybody in the 99%, they mostly hurt the lower class (blacks, browns), which doesn't vote
Some of you might dismiss because it's a FOX poll but this is the latest one (yesterday):
General Election: Trump vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 41, Trump 46 Trump +5
General Election: Carson vs. Clinton FOX News Carson 47, Clinton 42 Carson +5
General Election: Rubio vs. Clinton FOX News Rubio 50, Clinton 42 Rubio +8
General Election: Bush vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 39, Bush 45 Bush +6
General Election: Cruz vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 41, Cruz 45 Cruz +4
General Election: Fiorina vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 42, Fiorina 42 Tie
General Election: Christie vs. Clinton FOX News Clinton 43, Christie 46 Christie +3
General Election: Trump vs. Sanders FOX News Sanders 41, Trump 46 Trump +5
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...lls/president/
I think that will change this year, though, based on the Trump factor alone.
Nothing but LIES from Fox, and Repug shop Rasmussen (guaranteed Bishop Gecko landslide).
The Google search algorithm has propelled Trump as well. The internet is changing the process in ways we have yet to understand.
I still support him but his latest comments are concerning.
Inheriting wealth and running businesses over a bunch of sycophatics yes men have NOTHING to do with running a country, totally different objectives.
Donny T's great value is once again showing how ty, stupid, ignorant, uneducated 10Ms American are.
I support him due to the strength of his ideas. His business a en is only an added plus. However, some of his latest comments/retweets have been disappointing and his temperament appears worse than I had hoped for.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
