Both of those guys were combine finds. There isn’t time to vet or do background on guys like that, so they probably should focus on players they scout, long term.
On the court. Different thing altogether.
Both of those guys were combine finds. There isn’t time to vet or do background on guys like that, so they probably should focus on players they scout, long term.
Luka was the 19th pick guys. The chances of those picks busting are really high statistically. Not an apples to apples comp.
In 2021, sure I get the Sengun takes, but people are getting a little carried away too (4 more teams passed on him after us too). His best case is Vuc, but like Vuc today he’ll struggle to carve out a role in the modern nba.
No more stupid Diversity hires!!!
ing Brian Wrong would be flipping burgers if he didn’t diversity hire himself to GM position.
Yeah, can't say that we missed out on a potential all-star by picking Primo.
Sengun is basically Kanter 2.0, probably even worse on defense.
While these are the actions of one person, it’s not just one person.
Last edited by exstatic; 10-30-2022 at 09:13 AM.
Because he did it again at the hotel in Minny last week. He will have his day in court.
Have an abortion?
Some maid in a hotel in Minny is going to think she’s the one?
Perhaps some of the contract gurus (self-described?) on this board can answer this question about the standard NBA team/player contract. Is there a "morals clause" in the standard NBA contract that provides an way for a team to get rid of a player if he violates specific items in a morals clause.
Lots of employment contracts in various industries used to have morals clauses in them, however it might be that the NBA players association got this removed from the contractual agreements at some time in negotiations. I suppose morals clauses were/are hard to enforce unless the employer can use facts like criminal prosecution as an excuse for termination. But failute to act in a prudent manner by suspension or firing might void their position vis a vis the terms of the contractual wording of the agreement. It is clear to me from his voluntary statement that Primo must have fessed up to the team officials to at least some part of the accusations.
Of course morals clauses might just be a relic of an earlier time when a Supreme Court Justice could write in an opinion about pornography, "You know it when you see it." And the moral atmosphere about sexual practices in the country today is such that any morals clause might be problematic anyway. However, so much was made of the "me too" movement some years ago that it is clear to me that any organization like the Spurs would have to move quickly on something like this or risk financial and publicity problems that would cripple the franchise. They did.
Therefore, It is ludicrous to suggest that the Spurs FO knew anything about this problem until the recent incident. No team would knowingly ignore or cover up any indications of serious sexual predation at any time, whether before the draft or during a season as now.
Not sure I saw the Minnesota thing confirmed. There was some reporting from “reliable” sports tweeters that there were multiple separate instances of him exposing himself.
Wish I still spoke to my former boss. His son was chief? legal counsel for the nba and reviewed all nba contracts.
This is good![]()
Primo has gone OJ! lol
https://www.reddit.com/r/Austin/comm...ng_home_on_35/
That's not even close to a J or a P. Straight up dude is drawing balls and a .
Last edited by offset formation; 10-30-2022 at 09:35 AM.
well said
His autograph wasn't worth much before and it won't be worth now.
ISWYDT
Truth. End of thread TBH.
How many have you been denied?
Not sure how this plays into things, but he's a Canadian citizen here on a Visa
They can be finicky about people in legal jeopardy
Listening to nba radio just now. Amin El Hassin? was implying that Primo had these issues going back to some prep school days. That he was kicked out of prep school, possibly for the same reason? That the spurs would have had to have known about that incident if he could find it without much effort.
Which part of "woman" are you not reading properly?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)