Page 58 of 68 FirstFirst ... 848545556575859606162 ... LastLast
Results 1,426 to 1,450 of 1693
  1. #1426
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    U.S. agency error exposes 2.3 million disaster survivors to fraud

    The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) exposed 2.3 million disaster survivors to possible iden y theft and fraud by sharing sensitive personal information with an outside company,

    FEMA had shared financial records and other sensitive information of people who had participated in an emergency shelter program after being displaced by hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria and the California wildfires in 2017.

    FEMA had shared

    participants’ home addresses and

    bank account information with the contractor,

    along with necessary information like their names and birthdates.

    “has placed approximately 2.3 million disaster survivors at increased risk of iden y theft and fraud,” the Inspector General’s office said in a report.

    The name of the contractor was redacted.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...2F+Top+News%29

    no worries, the Russians and Chinese are the case.

    How did the anonymous contractor pay for the data, and to whom personally did the payment go?




  2. #1427
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Trash/Repug kakistocracy continues ...

    ‘Unable even to get basic facts right’: Paul Krugman obliterates the ‘hack’ economist Trump wants to appoint to the Fed


    Trash plans to appoint right-wing “economist” Stephen Moore to the Federal Reserve Board, and

    people who know anything about actual economics (and basic factual reporting) are livid.

    Moore, a fellow with the conservative Heritage Foundation,

    is best known for appearing on TV, talking about the economy, and completely
    botching his facts.

    Paul Krugman, a Nobel Prize-winning economist and columnist for the New York Times, lambasted the nomination of Moore, whom he has sparred with many times in the past.

    “Moore isn’t just a hack, with terrible judgment,” Krugman said on Twitter.

    “He’s a hack who has repeatedly shown himself unable even to get basic facts right.”

    Binyamin Applebaum, another Times columnist, noted that Moore once

    “got so many facts wrong that the Kansas City Star’s editorial page editor vowed never to publish his work again.”

    Indeed, he wrote a column trying to argue that low-tax states do better than high tax states, and he included this error-ridden passage:


    No-income-tax Texas gained 1 million jobs over the last five years;

    California, with its 13 percent tax rate, managed to lose jobs. Oops.

    Florida gained hundreds of thousands of jobs while New York lost jobs. Oops.

    In fact, as Kansas City Star columnist Yael Abouhalkah pointed out, in addition to choosing a particularly problematic time period to make this judgment, his numbers were just wrong:

    Texas did not gain 1 million jobs in the 2007-2012 period Moore measured. The correct figure was a gain of 497,400 jobs.


    Florida did not add hundreds of thousands of jobs in that span. It actually lost 461,500 jobs.

    New York, with [its] very high income tax rates, did not lose jobs during that time. It gained 75,900 jobs.
    Miriam Pepper, an editor of the Kansas City Star, told the

    Columbia Journalism Review after the incident that his errors were so egregious that she “won’t be running anything else from Stephen Moore.”


    Krugman noted that, in addition to this spectacular mistake, Moore was completely unrepentant when his predictions about Kansas’ tax cuts were refuted.

    “He made a bad prediction, which happens — but refused to learn from the error, falsified facts, and doubled down on his doctrine,” said Krugman.

    Need more convincing? Here he is getting the budget deficit — a simple government accounting measure — completely wrong. Here he is completely botching the facts about the Reagan tax cuts. Here he is making up facts on CNN.

    After spending much of his career shilling for the GOP,

    Moore has since become completely bought-in to Trump’s takeover of the party.

    Proving he’ll do anything to stay in the good graces of the Republican Party, the Heritage Foundation fellow wrote a book called

    “Trumponomics: Inside the America First Plan to Revive Our Economy”

    lavishly praising the president’s policies,

    despite increasing evidence that the White House’s boasting is baseless.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2019/03/unable-even-get-basic-facts-right-paul-krugman-obliterates-hack-economist-trump-wants-appoint-fed/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29

  3. #1428
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Repugs misogynists, following the Bible's misogyny

    Maine Republican says providing free tampons and pads would turn jails into 'country clubs'

    How much do Republicans hate women and people who menstruate? A lot.

    The latest example:

    One member of the GOP in Maine has asserted his (of course it’s a man) belief that if state jails provided free tampons and sanitary pads to incarcerated people, it would make jails too similar to a “country club.”

    Maine legislators voted on a
    bill amendment to guarantee incarcerated people access to tampons and sanitary pads.

    On the federal level, this is already a guarantee.

    If you’re in a local or state facility, however, you have to pay for them.

    , GOP Rep. Richard Pickett explicitly said that incarcerated people shouldn’t get additional access to menstrual products because "the jail system and the correctional system was never meant to be a country club,"

    the bill
    passed committee with a 6-4 vote. The four “no” votes were all Republicans.

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/21/1843961/-Maine-Republican-says-providing-free-tampons-and-pads-would-turn-jails-into-country-clubs?



  4. #1429
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Here's Republican Mo Brooks reading Hitler quotes on the floor of the House today

    Here’s the quote that Rep. Brooks wanted to hang his hat on as

    his big gotcha moment—showing the Democratic Party for what it is … the Nazis.

    Rep. Brooks:

    In that vein I quote from another socialist who mastered Big Lie propaganda to a maximum and deadly effect

    “that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily;

    and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.


    It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

    Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.”

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/25/1845122/-Here-s-Republican-Mo-Brooks-reading-Hitler-quotes-on-the-floor-of-the-House-today?detail=emaildkreHitler was a socialist? goddamn, you red/slave state cretins are ing stupid


  5. #1430
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    DeVos Defends $18 Million Cut to Special Olympics Funding

    While Asking Congress for $60 Million for Charter Schools


    "Just when you thought the Trump administration couldn't possibly stoop any lower..."

    https://www.commondreams.org/news/20...?cd-origin=rss

    This is the oligarchy's economic/social Darwinism. If you aren't white, male, healthy, wealthy, then WE WILL YOU.

    Ditzy Devos is supposedly a hard core Christian



  6. #1431
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,533
    booboo with 1,215 posts in what is basically his spurstalk diary

    next most posts comes from mikeanaro with 36

  7. #1432
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Trump Administration Announces New Expansion of Global ‘Gag Rule’

    Trash first implemented and expanded the global gag rule on day one of his administration.

    Pompeo said the administration was making “further refinements” on the global gag rule.

    “As before, we’ll continue to refuse to provide assistance to foreign [nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)] who perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning,” he said.

    “Now, as a result of my decision today, we’re also making clear we will refuse to provide assistance to foreign NGOs

    that give financial support to other foreign groups in the global abortion industry.

    We will enforce a strict prohibition on backdoor-funding schemes and end runs around our policy.

    American taxpayer dollars will not be used to underwrite abortions.”

    https://rewire.news/article/2019/03/26/trump-administration-announces-new-expansion-of-global-gag-rule/



  8. #1433
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Like all other red/slave states, Ohio loves to the poor, the non-white poo, to disease and death

    Ohio will cut Planned Parenthood funding within a month's time

    The state of Ohio will cut Planned Parenthood off from receiving any money from state or federal funds or block grants under a recently upheld state law that stops public funds from going to any organization that provides abortion.

    A federal appeals court
    ruled earlier this month that the Planned Parenthood affiliates in Ohio

    "do not have a due process right to perform abortions,"

    a ruling that the six dissenting judges called "an assault on a cons utional right."

    Planned Parenthood has 26 clinics in the state, just a handful of them providing abortions, while

    all the others provide basic, essential health services to women and their families.

    No public funding of any kind is used by Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio and Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio Region for abortion, but the grants and contracts they do have

    help provide health care for the poor at little or no cost, including

    "testing for HIV/AIDS and other STDs,

    Pap smears and

    other cancer screenings,

    infant mortality prevention programs and

    sexual health education programs."

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1845427

    So the racist, misogynist Repugs really, really want to over poor WOMEN.



  9. #1434
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    The Best People

    OF COURSE TRUMP’S FED PICK OWES THE I.R.S. MORE THAN $75,000




    The biggest thing working against Stephen Moore’s candidacy for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board is that, according to a host of respected economists across the political spectrum,

    he doesn’t know his ass from his elbow when it comes to fiscal or monetary policy.

    (Moore “does not have the intellectual gravitas for this important job,”
    said Greg Mankiw, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under George W. Bush.

    “Frankly so bad [that] the putatively serious economists in [the] Trump administration should resign as [a] matter of honor,”
    wrote University of Chicago’s Steven N. Durlauf.)

    So that’s the foremost reason the Senate should probably decline to confirm Moore—

    who was
    banned from the pages of a Kansas City newspaper for being so consistently wrong about everything—

    for the open seat on the Fed’s board of governors that
    Donald Trump wants him to take.

    But the news that he owes the I.R.S. a significant chunk of change
    won’t exactly help his case!

    "
    Stephen Moore, whom President Donald Trump said he’ll nominate for a seat on the Federal Reserve, owes more than $75,000 in taxes and other penalties, according to the U.S. government.

    A federal tax lien filed in the circuit court for Montgomery County, Maryland, where Moore owns a house, says that

    the government won a judgment against Moore for $75,328.80.

    The January 2018 filing said it was for unpaid taxes from the 2014 tax year and could accrue additional penalties and other costs."

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/stephen-moore-fed-taxes

  10. #1435
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Bayer-Monsanto merger approved, consolidating/concentrating suppliers of seed and poisons, reducing compe ion.

    Liz Warren wants to stop the merger to help farmers who are enslaved (aka not free) to these suppliers

  11. #1436
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Trash's anti-scientific kakistorcracy gonna infirm, kill more people

    EPA Science Panel Considering Guidelines That Upend Basic Air Pollution Science

    https://www.npr.org/2019/03/28/70716...lution-science

  12. #1437
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Emails Show Current FAA Chief Coordinated Policy With Airline Lobbyists

    Political appointees typically aren’t allowed to participate in issues that involve their former employer or clients they have worked for, as part of President Donald Trump’s ethics rules. But the rules did not apply to Elwell during his first few months at the FAA when he worked on the deregulatory team.

    He had been classified as a kind of government consultant — a “special-government employee” — who isn’t bound by the ethics rules.

    Elwell continued strategizing with his former lobbyist colleagues even after he was no longer a special-government employee and rose up to the top ranks of the agency.

    Elwell was named the FAA’s deputy administrator in June 2017. A month later, Pinkerton emailed Elwell, asking him to “weigh in on directly” on compliance issues contained in the FAA’s five-year funding bill.


    Elwell wrote back that he would be “Happy to do it,” and he asked a subordinate to help “set it up.”


    The emails offer a detailed picture of the tight connections between the airline industry and the government, while the FAA is facing increased scrutiny over its oversight after two crashes of the Boeing’s 737 Max.

    “These emails underline why there’s a prohibition on private communications between new federal officials and old lobbying clients,”

    said Kathleen Clark, a government ethics expert and law professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

    “The tone, the clubbiness.

    The issue is that the inside group appears to be not the flying public.

    The inside group appears to be the airlines.”

    https://www.nationalmemo.com/emails-...ted-lobbyists/

    aka, the corruption of govt by "regulatory capture"



  13. #1438
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Trump’s Medicare Overseer Spent Millions On Her ‘Personal Brand’

    Seema Verma, the official Trump installed to oversee Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare,

    has been spending millions of tax dollars on Republican public relations and media consultants to make her look good.

    Verma is the head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services agency (CMS), and Politico reports that in that role

    she has squandered over $3.25 million in taxpayer funds on the vanity project.


    “The head of Obamacare doesn’t need outside consultants to get reporters to talk to her,

    a CMS official told the outlet, highlighting the absurdity of Verma’s actions. Nonetheless, Verma has

    handed out money to a squadron of Republican consultants.

    “Some career CMS staff have voiced their concerns to political appointees within the agency about routing taxpayer dollars to GOP consultants and helping a federal official like Verma improve her personal brand,”

    https://www.nationalmemo.com/trumps-medicare-overseer-spent-millions-on-her-personal-brand/



  14. #1439
    LMAO koriwhat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    38,008
    wow what an echo chamber of lunacy!

  15. #1440
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Murderous, blood-thirsty, war-mongering barbaric USA Cons utional-izes sadistic capital punishment.

    Death row inmates not guaranteed a 'painless death,' Supreme Court rules


    a decision written by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court ruled 5-4

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-execution/death-row-inmates-not-guaranteed-a-painless-death-supreme-court-rules-idUSKCN1RD2J5?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_so urce=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed% 3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F+US+%2F+Top+News%2 9



  16. #1441
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Rapers for Christ, Christ for Rapers

    As DeVos Eases Sexual Assault Rules, Her Old High School May Provide a Test Case



    If there was any school where her daughter would feel safe, Mic e Hoffman thought, it would be Holland Christian High School.

    But after her 15-year-old was sexually assaulted by her 17-year-old boyfriend, another student at the school, Ms. Hoffman realized how misplaced that confidence was.

    Instead of helping,

    the school’s principal called the assault “underage sex” and

    told her the school was “not taking sides.”

    the secretary moves to overhaul the law that governs school sexual assault — and

    to bolster the rights of the accused

    while narrowing the responsibilities that schools have to investigate sexual misconduct.

    We pray

    that ours can be the case that makes Betsy say, ‘maybe this isn’t the right way to go,’” Ms. Hoffman said.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/01/us/politics/betsy-devos-sexual-assault- le-ix.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

  17. #1442
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Legalized Torture

    In an appalling death penalty opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch just overturned 60 years of precedent.




    On Monday, five justices of the Supreme Court authorized Missouri to torture a man to death.

    In the process, they appear to have

    overruled decades of Eighth Amendment precedents in a quest to let states impose barbaric punishments, including excruciating executions, on prisoners.

    The court’s conservative majority has

    converted a once-fringe view into the law of the land,

    imperiling dozens of decisions protecting the rights of death row inmates, as well as juvenile offenders.

    Its ruling signals

    the end of an Eighth Amendment jurisprudence governed by “civilized standards”—and the beginning of a new, brutal era in American capital punishment.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinion for the court, however, does much more than condemn Bucklew to a harrowing demise.

    It also quietly overrules, or at least erodes, more than 60 years of precedents, including several written by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

    Gorsuch embraced a vision of the Eighth Amendment supported by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia that has consistently been rejected as dangerously extreme by a majority of the court.

    In Baze and Glossip, the court explained that “because it is settled that capital punishment is cons utional,”

    there “must be” a cons utional “means of carrying it out.”

    “[B]ecause some risk of pain is inherent in any method of execution,” the court has held,

    “the Cons ution does not require the avoidance of all risk of pain.”

    The court’s duty, then, is simply to ensure that states do not impose a risky method of execution when a less painful method is at their disposal.

    Thomas and Scalia went further. In both cases, they argued that, as originally understood,

    the Eighth Amendment only prohibited states from intentionally making executions more painful than they had to be.

    So long as a state does not “superadd” pain to an execution, it has complied with the Eighth Amendment.

    Thomas’ theory would effectively shut down challenges to every method of execution unless an inmate had (impossible to obtain) evidence th

    in Bucklew, Gorsuch writes that “revisiting that debate isn’t necessary here.” But he then does exactly that—and

    adopts Thomas’ interpretation
    of the Eighth Amendment, effectively overruling 60 years of precedent.

    According to Gorsuch, “the question in dispute” here is whether lethal injection “cruelly superadds pain” to Bucklew’s death.

    But that language does not come from Baze or Glossip. It comes from Thomas’ separate opinions, which were joined only by Scalia.

    With one neat trick, Gorsuch has transformed the “superadds pain” test from a minority viewpoint to binding Supreme Court precedent.
    since 1958, the Supreme Court has rejected an originalist interpretation of the Eighth Amendment

    Instead, the court has asked whether a punishment violates the “evolving standards of decency” of a “civilized society.”

    , by forcing states to use the less painful of two execution methods,

    the court adopted a resolutely nonoriginalist view that the Eighth Amendment may require a more “civilized” death.

    In Bucklew, Gorsuch gutted that logic and replaced it with Thomas’ hard-line originalism.

    Gorsuch cast doubt on a vast range of precedents built on the “evolving standards of decency” rule

    by subs uting it for the “superadds pain” principle.


    Brett Kavanaugh has replaced Kennedy, and on Monday, he provided the fifth vote to let Missouri kill Bucklew—and tacitly repudiate his predecessor’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence.

    . If the court pursues Gorsuch’s originalist path, then it must overturn Kennedy’s juvenile justice decisions and

    permit juvenile life without parole once again.

    The court could also allow the execution of minors, mentally disabled people, and those who committed crimes other than murder.

    So long as a state does not “superadd pain,”

    it can apparently get away with anything, even barbarous executions that don’t intentionally inflict unnecessary suffering.

    Welcome to our post-Kennedy death penalty jurisprudence, where legalized torture is back on the table.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...y-torture.html


    Cons utional BARBARITY is what you rightwing assholes voted for, right?

    America is ed by conservatives, Repugs, oligarchy, BigCorp, and un able.

    Barbarous, extremely but "incidentally" painful executions are now Cons utional





  18. #1443
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    SCOTUS s allow unlimited, excruciating PAIN and suffering during human executions!

    but

    Who will think of the DOGS?

    FDA Aims to Reduce Animal Testing and End Use of Dogs as Test Subjects

    https://www.projectcensored.org/fda-aims-to-reduce-animal-testing-and-end-use-of-dogs-as-test-subjects/

  19. #1444
    I needs six for my fix. UnWantedTheory's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,095
    The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Legalized Torture

    In an appalling death penalty opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch just overturned 60 years of precedent.




    On Monday, five justices of the Supreme Court authorized Missouri to torture a man to death.

    In the process, they appear to have

    overruled decades of Eighth Amendment precedents in a quest to let states impose barbaric punishments, including excruciating executions, on prisoners.

    The court’s conservative majority has

    converted a once-fringe view into the law of the land,

    imperiling dozens of decisions protecting the rights of death row inmates, as well as juvenile offenders.

    Its ruling signals

    the end of an Eighth Amendment jurisprudence governed by “civilized standards”—and the beginning of a new, brutal era in American capital punishment.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch’s opinion for the court, however, does much more than condemn Bucklew to a harrowing demise.

    It also quietly overrules, or at least erodes, more than 60 years of precedents, including several written by Justice Anthony Kennedy.

    Gorsuch embraced a vision of the Eighth Amendment supported by Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia that has consistently been rejected as dangerously extreme by a majority of the court.

    In Baze and Glossip, the court explained that “because it is settled that capital punishment is cons utional,”

    there “must be” a cons utional “means of carrying it out.”

    “[B]ecause some risk of pain is inherent in any method of execution,” the court has held,

    “the Cons ution does not require the avoidance of all risk of pain.”

    The court’s duty, then, is simply to ensure that states do not impose a risky method of execution when a less painful method is at their disposal.

    Thomas and Scalia went further. In both cases, they argued that, as originally understood,

    the Eighth Amendment only prohibited states from intentionally making executions more painful than they had to be.

    So long as a state does not “superadd” pain to an execution, it has complied with the Eighth Amendment.

    Thomas’ theory would effectively shut down challenges to every method of execution unless an inmate had (impossible to obtain) evidence th

    in Bucklew, Gorsuch writes that “revisiting that debate isn’t necessary here.” But he then does exactly that—and

    adopts Thomas’ interpretation
    of the Eighth Amendment, effectively overruling 60 years of precedent.

    According to Gorsuch, “the question in dispute” here is whether lethal injection “cruelly superadds pain” to Bucklew’s death.

    But that language does not come from Baze or Glossip. It comes from Thomas’ separate opinions, which were joined only by Scalia.

    With one neat trick, Gorsuch has transformed the “superadds pain” test from a minority viewpoint to binding Supreme Court precedent.
    since 1958, the Supreme Court has rejected an originalist interpretation of the Eighth Amendment

    Instead, the court has asked whether a punishment violates the “evolving standards of decency” of a “civilized society.”

    , by forcing states to use the less painful of two execution methods,

    the court adopted a resolutely nonoriginalist view that the Eighth Amendment may require a more “civilized” death.

    In Bucklew, Gorsuch gutted that logic and replaced it with Thomas’ hard-line originalism.

    Gorsuch cast doubt on a vast range of precedents built on the “evolving standards of decency” rule

    by subs uting it for the “superadds pain” principle.


    Brett Kavanaugh has replaced Kennedy, and on Monday, he provided the fifth vote to let Missouri kill Bucklew—and tacitly repudiate his predecessor’s Eighth Amendment jurisprudence.

    . If the court pursues Gorsuch’s originalist path, then it must overturn Kennedy’s juvenile justice decisions and

    permit juvenile life without parole once again.

    The court could also allow the execution of minors, mentally disabled people, and those who committed crimes other than murder.

    So long as a state does not “superadd pain,”

    it can apparently get away with anything, even barbarous executions that don’t intentionally inflict unnecessary suffering.

    Welcome to our post-Kennedy death penalty jurisprudence, where legalized torture is back on the table.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...y-torture.html


    Cons utional BARBARITY is what you rightwing assholes voted for, right?

    America is ed by conservatives, Repugs, oligarchy, BigCorp, and un able.

    Barbarous, extremely but "incidentally" painful executions are now Cons utional




    This is beyond ed up.

  20. #1445
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    The hate industrial complex is also silent

    The GOP’s response to White House whistleblower: Nothing to see here

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...nl_most&wpmm=1

    ... if Obama had done the same?



  21. #1446
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    WTF?! Republicans defend security clearances—say 'only' 5 people cleared despite 'serious' concerns

    The entire Republican Party spent two years dog-piling on Hillary Clinton over her emails and use of a private server. Time and time again, they said she could not be trusted on issues of national security.

    Most incredibly, though, it says the security clearances are no big deal because only four or five of those people cleared for security clearances had “very serious” issues.

    If Kline overturned only—at most—

    five clearance adjudications with very serious concerns out of five thousand,

    Ms. Newbold’s concerns seem overblown.
    Bolded for emphasis because this is stunningly irresponsible.

    The Republican defense is that “at most—five” people with “serious” security concerns were cleared over Newfold’s objections.

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/4/1/1846934/-WTF-Republicans-defend-security-clearances-say-only-five-people-cleared-despite-serious-concern?detail=emaildkre


    "butter emails!" so Hillary can't be trusted

    Trash's National SECURITY Advisor was compromised and lied about it, butter emails!




  22. #1447
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Supreme Court's Death Penalty Ruling Leaves Legal Experts Aghast

    fundamentally erodes protections against torture enshrined in the U.S. Cons ution.

    The decision was denounced as

    “atrocious,”

    “blood-thirsty” and

    “barbaric”

    by death penalty abolitionists and other critics, with some saying the high court’s approval of Bucklew’s execution is

    tantamount to nullifying the Cons ution’s Eighth Amendment

    —the law banning cruel and unusual punishment.

    ============================

    Ian Millhiser
    ✔@imillhiser

    I really cannot exaggerate how radical and how significant the opinion Gorsuch handed down today is.

    It completely rewrites the Court's understanding of a provision of the Bill of Rights -- and

    it portends similarly revolutionary opinions in the future.


    ===================

    Mark Joseph Stern
    ✔@mjs_DC

    Gorsuch's atrocious opinion in today's death penalty case essentially convert's Thomas' extreme interpretation of the 8th Amendment—long considered a fringe view—into the law of the land. Just jaw-dropping.

    ====================

    Mark Joseph Stern

    ✔@mjs_DC

    The Supreme Court's 5–4 death penalty decision today is beyond appalling.

    It legalizes torture and effectively reverses 60 years of progressive precedent.

    It transforms a barbaric view of the 8th Amendment into the law of the land.

    It is horrific.

    =====================

    Elie Mystal
    wrote that Gorsuch’s opinion

    will not only condemn Bucklew to a painful death instead of forcing the state to find a less painful method, as the inmate requested,

    but will weaken the Eighth Amendment’s protections for other death row inmates

    for generations to come.

    “Unknown numbers of innocent people have been executed in this country since the death penalty was reinstated,” wrote Mystal.

    “Untold numbers of guilty people have known the spiteful vengeance some people mistake for justice.

    Through it all, the Eighth Amendment sits on the sidelines, a grand idea neutered by our society’s rage and cowardice,

    waiting for better men and women to live up to its noble promise.”

    “But Neil Gorsuch is not a better man,”
    he continued.

    “Instead of just killing the murderer and being done with it,

    Gorsuch could not resist seeing the Bucklew case as

    an opportunity to experiment with justifications of the

    state’s right to inflict suffering that have long been discarded by decent people.”

    ====================

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor rebuked Gorsuch’s position that Bucklew’s execution must not be delayed any longer.

    “There are higher values than ensuring that executions run on time,”

    Sotomayor wrote.

    “If a death sentence or the manner in which it is carried out violates the Cons ution,

    that stain can never come out.

    Our jurisprudence must remain one of vigilance and care, not one of dismissiveness.”

    =============

    “The majority’s willingness

    to cast aside one of the most firmly established assumptions of cons utional law so casually,”

    Millhiser added,

    “suggests that

    they will do it again.

    And again.

    And again.”

    https://www.truthdig.com/articles/supreme-courts-death-penalty-ruling-leaves-legal-experts-aghast/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+Truthdig+Truthdig%3A+Drilling+Beneath+th e+Headlines

    Gorsuch isn't alone, 4 others justices agreed, the slimebag Federalists put him forward, most of the legal profession approved him.

    AmeriKKKa is ed and un able.

    ing Catholics

    ing LIAR Roberts "just call balls and strikes" ?

    His court of oligarchy is an EXTREMELY ACTIVIST, LAW-MAKING, not law-judging, court.


    Last edited by boutons_deux; 04-02-2019 at 01:32 PM.

  23. #1448
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Interior Secretary Nominee David Bernhardt

    One Step Closer to Joining Trump’s Swamp-Filled Cabinet With Help of Key Western Senators McSally, Gardner, Daines and Heinrich


    Today the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee voted 14-6 to move controversial Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt’s nomination to a full Senate vote,

    “It’s no surprise that a group of Senators who owe so much to special interest lobbyists would support this choice for Interior Secretary. For the last two years, conflict-ridden David Bernhardt has tipped the scales in favor of former clients, likely violating his ethics pledge and responsibilities to the American people.

    calls by Senator Wyden and others to delay his vote based on serious concerns regarding Bernhardt’s culture of corruption were ignored.

    Interior’s Office of Inspector General is reviewing evidence that Bernhardt violated his ethics pledge when he acted on behalf of a former client,
    Westlands Water District.

    New details
    released today by the New York Times found that Bernhardt had continued to associate with the water district at least until his deputy secretary nomination on April 28, 2017.

    Within four months of his confirmation as Interior Deputy Secretary, Bernhardt
    pushed for a decision that would be beneficial for his former client.

    Western Values Project (WVP)
    filed suit against the Interior Department in July of 2018 for public do ents related to Bernhardt’s involvement with his former lobbying firm and clients.

    https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2019/04/04/interior-secretary-nominee-david-bernhardt-one-step-closer-joining-trumps-swamp?cd-origin=rss

    the corruption, has been, and will be, unPresidented, as Trash installs All The Usual Swamp Monsters in his Exec





  24. #1449
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    After hundreds of crashes, this Britax jogging stroller faced recall. Then Trump appointees stepped in.

    The crashes were brutal.

    With no warning, the front wheel on the three-wheeled BOB jogging strollers fell off, causing the carriages to careen and even flip over.

    Adults shattered bones.

    They tore ligaments.

    Children smashed their teeth.

    They gashed their faces.

    One child bled from his ear canal.

    The agency’s staff members investigated for months before deciding in 2017 that one of the most popular jogging strollers on the market was unsafe and needed to be recalled.

    “The danger that was there was just so obvious,” said Marietta Robinson, a former Democratic commissioner who was still at the agency when the injury reports surfaced. “It was appalling.”

    But BOB’s maker, Britax Child Safety, refused the agency’s request in 2017 for a voluntary recall of nearly 500,000 strollers.

    The company said the strollers were safe when used as instructed and met industry standards for safety.

    It sued to force a recall in February 2018. Britax kept fighting. That was unusual. Companies normally want to avoid public clashes with safety regulators, according to past and current agency staff members.

    But the leadership of the safety agency was about to change.

    And that meant Britax might not have to recall the BOB after all.

    The untold story of the Britax case shows how changes in

    the safety agency’s leadership under President Trump


    influenced the handling of a product that the commission believed had injured consumers.

    The case was even more striking because it unfolded as Republicans assumed day-to-day control of the agency,

    eventually earning a majority on the agency’s oversight commission for the first time in more than a decade.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...=.d1a239e49550

    This is what all y'all Trash fellators and Repug voters voted for, right? Dangerous products kept on the marke to protect BigCorp profits.

  25. #1450
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,522
    Ethics experts sound alarm over confirmation process of Trump’s pick to lead NOAA

    "Nobody could argue with a straight face" that Barry Myers doesn’t have conflicts of interest.

    Should he be confirmed to lead NOAA, his role will involve oversight of the National Weather Service, a conflict of interest that has raised red flags among ethics watchdogs due to Myers’ prior role as chief executive of AccuWeather.

    AccuWeather, a family-run company, relies heavily on NOAA’s weather service data for its forecasts.

    Under Myers’ leadership, the company argued that NOAA should reduce the amount of weather information it releases directly to the public.

    In essence,

    AccuWeather sought to restrict public access to data funded by taxpayers and instead make it available exclusively to private companies that would then use the data in products sold to the public.

    As a result, people would pay twice for the information, once through taxes and a second time to access it through companies.

    “He’s for privatizing the weather service,

    which is sort of contrary to an important role the government serves, and down the road would cause all kinds of problems for the pubic.

    I mean, what if you had to pay to get the weather instead of just getting it?”

    “There rightly has been significant concern surrounding the ability of Myers to act impartially,”

    https://thinkprogress.org/barry-myer...-9702aad73651/

    A conflicted businessman with no science degree to run a scientific agency as kakistocrat



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •