Again with no sources to back up your claims?
You have proven nothing. My faith is unshaken.
Again with no sources to back up your claims?
You have proven nothing. My faith is unshaken.
Hopefully I won't go to for that pun.
![]()
Nope. Even if you lived a "perfect life" and never heard the name Jesus you would go to . Thats what alot of Christians think. Here is the crazy part.
You could be a priest, a alter boy in his ass,slit his neck,stick ur kawk in that,steal the change from his pocket,buy some crack,get drunk,drive to the special Olympics and run over every re on the feild and as long as you except Jesus you will go to heaven because he died for the sins of all men.
Your insipid hack is getting old.
Have you done what I asked you to do?
Have you stared at a mirror, entered a trance and asked the demon-world that you be possesed by a legion? I mean if they don't exist what harm could that possibly do?
This pretty much sums up the entire thread for everybody involved.
OK, back to work. Adios, amigas and amigos. Try not to get too much spittle on your keyboards.
Sounds like angel is descartes reincarnated.
your dad really ed you up.
I also jumped back in to address this issue, because I think there's some mis-information being tossed about. Particularly by Christians who are afraid to confront the reality that their God is ultimately going to judge people and sentence them to death. That's the reality of your faith.
So to the question, "what about those who never hear the gospel? Will God condemn them?", the answer is, in short...Yes, he will condemn them.
You have to think about things in terms of sin and mercy. Sin brings quilt, mercy brings a pardon of that guilt. Anyone who has sinned deserves punishment, and those who have not confessed Jesus as their savior will not be en led to the mercy that salvation brings. Let me put it to you this way...if I ask you, "How can a judge/jury send someone to jail if he didn't offer him a pardon first?" The answer is, if the guy's guilty, the judge/jury is justified by throwing him in prison. There is no obligation to offer a pardon prior to a determination of guilt.
The same is true of God...He can justly convict someone who has broken his laws, even though the sinner has heard nothing about God's pardon in Jesus.
Why then are the Palestinians not allowed into Egypt and have only restricted access to Saudi Arabia's holy sites? Why don't the Syrians let them in to Syria? Or why do the Jordanians send them to refugee camps?
The tactic by the Middle Eastern world to politically masquerade the issue as solely-religious has been cause for much strife.
I have tested that theory. I said " I will sell my soul to you Devil only if you will give me 10 million dollars and allow me to live as I want until I am a 100" Nothing. I stopped asking years ago. Plus I figiure if there was a Devil and granted me my offer I could re-nig by accepting Jesus Christ in my life.
Good analogy.![]()
None, if one is a true skeptic.
I imagine it would be something like the guy who dared a fellow panelist who fancied himself a sorcerer to curse him to death on Indian national television.
That said, putting oneself into a trance would make one highly suggestible, and even if something happened, would hardly be proof of demons.After nearly two hours, the anchor declared the tantrik’s failure. The tantrik, unwilling to admit defeat, tried the excuse that a very strong god whom Sanal might be worshipping obviously protected him. “No, I am an atheist,” said Sanal Edamaruku. Finally, the disgraced tantrik tried to save his face by claiming that there was a never-failing special black magic for ultimate destruction, which could, however, only been done at night. Bad luck again, he did not get away with this, but was challenged to prove his claim this very night in another “breaking news” live program.
(begin edit)
Perhaps one should go up to a skeptic website and see if anyone would take this challenge to see. Easy enough to record and it would make an interesting exercise.
Bingo. Its geo-political, it always has been.
Like I said, I am not saying religion hasnt inlfamed the situation to an intolerable degree (it most certainly has), but with or without religion, when your country is given over to foreigners by foreigners, hate tends to breed.
until proven otherwise.....none.
you watch too many horror flicks
![]()
"I would say the same about your dad... but honestly I'm starting to believe you grew up without his counsel." Really??? Is that type of banter you want to get into?
...
Seriously - grow up.
Otherwise I will be forced to hack into your computer and delete everything you hold dear. Haven't you heard? All MIT graduates can do that.
Actually, I don't waste my time with them -- just an old tale from grade school.
Why do you think that land is important to israel in the first place? they could have formed a state somewhere in south america maybe.
please, use your brain.
religion is the cause of all of this.
the babylonians destroyed the first temple, then the romans destroyed the second temple. now the jews have their holy land back, took it by force, and then they want to build the third temple but one little problem. there is a mosque on the very site where the third temple should be built. apparently, both religions think that is a very special spot.
really now, it's not up for debate. that land is holy to both sides. that's why israel wanted
Last edited by MiamiHeat; 01-07-2009 at 04:51 PM.
Uhh, yeah, because it was their Promised Land, right?
Because Europe decided "Hey! Its in the Bible, right? Might as well give it to them."
Come on. They gave it to them because no one else wanted them, period. And Britain didnt give two s about which of their multiple real-estates they had to give in order to get the Jews out.
It wasnt religion. It was convenience.
It's like traveling to another country. Just because you don't know all the rules doesn't mean that you can't be held accountable for those rules.
Thing is, I question the rules.
A Jew born in say 20 AD and living his life by the Hebrew code, firmly believing in God and doing the things he knows to do according to the Old Testament is still screwed if he dies sometime after 33 AD.....
If he had died around 32 AD, he would have been ok.
wow how hard headed can you be. truly unbelievable
Jews HAVE ALWAYS MOURNED the destruction of the FIRST TEMPLE and then the romans destroying the SECOND TEMPLE. THEY were nomads for a LONG TIME YEARNING to go back to the HOly Land promised to them by God. "Zion the land of Israel" it's -ALL- OVER THE BIBLE.
the jewish prayer book, the bible, they WANT TO GO BACK TO ISRAEL, "THE PROMISED LAND"
That = RELIGION. ridiculous.
you're confusing counsel with brainwashing. his act was very effective on you.
you should have had more faith in your education.Seriously - grow up.
Otherwise I will be forced to hack into your computer and delete everything you hold dear. Haven't you heard? All MIT graduates can do that.
Yes, the first grandfather clause.
I think he may have been grandfathered in the Hebrew code.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)