Where were the charges placed in the working offices?
Besides all the physical evidence, which strongly favors the "official account", common sense suggests that this is not even REMOTELY possible.
Remember, this is the same administration that couldn't even "out" a covert CIA agent (secretary) without getting busted. What makes you think they could pull off the mother of all conspiracies?
, Cheney can't even go bird hunting without shooting someone in the ass.
Where were the charges placed in the working offices?
By the way, YOUR re ed.
1.36 Newton-meter = 1 Jules....your no engineer or you would know this....
.......liar.....
Last edited by Nbadan; 04-11-2008 at 01:33 PM.
By the way, if you are trying to say "you are" it's spelled "you're".
Newton*meters, Joules, foot*lbs, BTU, etc. are units of ENERGY.
And, 1 Newton*meter = 1 Joule. Don't know where you pulled 1.36 from. Galileo's ass?
1 N = kg * meter/sec^2, thus a force of 1 N acting on a mass of 1 kg produces an acceleration of 1 m/second^2....and my bad, 1 foot/lbs is equal to about 1.36 joules but being a engineer, I'm sure you already knew that..
![]()
The 9/11 Commission says the Twin Towers fell in 10 seconds and 8 seconds repectively.
All of it? The whole thing? Is the commission report a scientific paper?
Where do you think all the charges were placed?
As your math degree makes you a demolitions expert, I expect you to be specific.
^ And how is this considered Real 9-11 Research? ^
Is there a topic in this forum where us adults can post?
Probably not.
Just got done reading all pages dis is some pat-na!
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse....i?u=911_morons
my sentiments about these 9/11 idiots.
- Mars
Great site. Even that lunatic doesn't believe in this .
God job.
I can't believe the Truthers are still arguing this stuff.
Okay ... I'm feeling benevolent. Truthers, you are right. I believe you. The government, with the possible cooperation of al-Qaeda, our sworn enemy, engineered 9-11 for the purposes of building an American empire, stealing oil, and furthering the military-industrial complex. I'm with you. You win.
Feel better now?
who are you talking to?
It's probably the convenient, easy-to-attack straw man that the 911 faith crowd likes to group all people who see contradiction in the official 911 fairy tale from a government which has lied to the American people no less than 4000 times about the Iraq war, but we are supposed to believe that they didn't lie at all about 911 even though they controlled every aspect of a investigation which they didn't want to fund in the first place...
...at least I'm man enough to admit that there either was a conspiracy which involved placing bombs in the WTC towers, or there wasn't, but none of the 911 faith crowd can admit that there is even the remote possibility that all these anomalies we have talked about in this thread can point to anything other than the official 911 fairy tale, even though they can't provide any scientific backing for their beliefs....that's about all you need to know about that crowd....
Too bad every "anomaly" completely falls apart under any kind of scrutiny. Whenever that happens, you just change the subject and add another five pages to the thread.
...the only 'scrutiny' I'm interested in are those based on sound scientific principals, anything else is just opinion and you know what those are worth...
Let me know when you post something based on sound scientific principles.
..let me know when you can define scientific principles...
Let me know when you get some common sense.
Or tell me where all the charges were placed.
I said and think no such thing.
This news clip does not answer the question.
The question, as asked was:
Are there any eyewitness accounts of visible explosive devices at the World Trade Center?
Your "proof" video was about a truck that had explosives in it (it was later determined that the truck in question was on its way to (sur- ing-prise) a contruction site.
NOWHERE IN THAT VIDEO DID ANY WITNESS SAY "I SAW EXPLOSIVE DEVICES WIRED TO COLUMNS AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER, SO THE ANSWER IS NOT "YES" BUT "NO".
Last edited by RandomGuy; 04-14-2008 at 10:57 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)