Here's a Daily Kos article you didn't post for some odd reason:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...16/1017/581734
OK, there is a visibly-pregnant Sarah Palin talking with a CBS 11 (Dallas Juneau) reporter at the Governor's meeting in Texas end of the Alaska legislative session. She clearly appears to be pregnant.
Unless someone has counter evidence, we can drop this crap now. Yes, there are still some interesting questions, such as why she flew to Dallas and back when she was this pregnant, and why the Alaska Airlines crewmembers insisted that she was not visibly pregnant on the flight. Nevertheless, until this photo is debunked, we look stupid pushing this rumor.
That is all.
That's from August 31.
"national media"
"running with it"
Odd being,
A. Ya'll weren't asking for an article admitting they ed up. They can be sued for slander of course they're going to denounce it.
B. I don't read the daily kos.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/20...16/1017/581734
That's from August 31.
"national media"
"running with it"
But your argument is that pretty much everyone else does because it's huge national media-- so everyone knows the story was debunked.
Odd.
*Doing the responsible thing, and admitting their mistake to the whole world, proves their bad faith.*
I don't watch CNN, MSNBC, FOX News or read any papers or magazines either....I guess they don't count as Media on the basis of my lack of vieweship either..
Your logic, not mine.
Do you believe everything you say?
The debunking was in the national media by your definition.
Your logic, not mine.
In his mind, that only proves their guilt. It fit their political agenda.
It damns them doubly.
My logic was that Bristol Palin was attacked by the National Media upon Sarah Palin's nomination for VP, which I have proved, it had nothing to do with whether or not it was debunked...
One blog posted the rumor then debunked it before September.
You really played it up like it was something much bigger.
You should have just said one blog posted the rumor and then nothing else really happened.
It wasn't debunked until Sarah Palin announced her daughter was pregnant.
One blog posted the rumor then debunked it before September.
But that's not what happend, it was reported in the National Media by multiple sources, and it was an extremely libelous claim with absolutely no basis in reality that nonetheless was done with malicious purpose because Sarah Palin was nominated for Vice President. It was an attack on a child, two of them in fact, done to hurt, and entirely for political gain, because of the positive vibe to the Palin nomination, nothing of that sort was ever leveled at Obama's chldren, it most certainly was not harmless or just happy liberal fun.You really played it up like it was something much bigger.
You should have just said one blog posted the rumor and then nothing else really happened.
You think it's funny harmless good natured fun..I don't.
Wrong. It was debunked one day before.
I provided a link to that.
You can see it.
Stop right there.But that's not what happend, it was reported in the National Media by multiple sources
Prove it.
Post them.
I don't think that, I just don't care that much because unlike you I don't have an imaginary girlfriend.You think it's funny harmless good natured fun..I don't.
Since you are so deadly serious about this, tell us all what you have done about it besides complain about it on the internets.
Dude, boutons just called Palin a in another thread.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...54&postcount=4
What are you going to do about it?
That really doesn't debunk anything, and it also doesn't change the fact her daughter was attacked. Beyond that I never said the ing thing didn't get debunked nor was it ever the focus of this argument prior to you getting the Daily kos stuck up your ass...And finally you can't debunk that act of attacking a child. There is no debunking that.
Google it.Stop right there.
Prove it.
Post them.
You obviously care as much as I do since you've argued about it as long as I have. Actually you might even care about it more since I attempted to go see a movie. You just care on the wrong side.I don't think that, I just don't care that much because unlike you I don't have an imaginary girlfriend.
These attacks on her kids originate on the internet...that is where they must be fought.Since you are so deadly serious about this, tell us all what you have done about it besides complain about it on the internets.
Point out what an asshole you are for not being offended by it. You really need t hat explained?
Sure it does.By respected professional national mainstream journalists ArcXIX and Inky99and it also doesn't change the fact her daughter was attacked.I acknowledged that loons did indeed do that. I consider ArcXIX and Inky99 to be loons and you consider them respected professional national mainstream journalists. Feel free to stick them up your ass.Beyond that I never said the ing thing didn't get debunked nor was it ever the focus of this argument, prior to you getting the Daily kos stuck up your ass...And finally you can't debunk that act of attacking a child. There is no debunking that.
I did. I found pretty straight reporting talking about the disclosure and the reasons for the disclosure. If you have anything different, post the links.Google it.
Nah, I really don't care about it. You are getting more stupid and delusional as time goes on. It's fun to watch.You obviously care as much as I do since you've argued about it as long as I have. Actually you might even care about it more since I attempted to go see a movie. You just care on the wrong side.
And what have you done about it on the internets outside this forum?These attacks on her kids originate on the internet...that is where they must be fought.
Last edited by ChumpDumper; 07-06-2009 at 06:41 AM.
That is by far the tiest most incoherent and messiest post I have ever seen from you, looks better after I cleaned it up. I'm not the one getting stupider...when you come back after going to sleep you'll realize that.
Sorry. I cleared up the errors. I've done much worse.
Is there still something you need help with, or is this just a way to avoid admitting you aren't doing anything about attacks on children outside the forum?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
