Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 126 to 146 of 146
  1. #126
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    By the way broheim, that dude in you sig is awesome, lol.

  2. #127
    Believe. Basketballgirl25's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Post Count
    1,620
    so now the only suspense is if Dallas can avoid a sweep.
    I agree with this, because I don't think there will be another game in Dallas like the one last night if I had to bet. If Dallas can play a good game again then they can win, if not then Nuggets win

  3. #128
    Believe. Basketballgirl25's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Post Count
    1,620
    I'm sorry, but for anyone here who posts on www.dallas-mavs.com some people are stupid, ok one person. My friend is a Mavs fan and signed up that's how I read the posts, but anyway post by Tremaine

    "Yes, they are good, but also extremely lucky, and they still have not faced a team in the playoffs that is a true test.
    The Hornets were just a MASH unit and Josh Howard was limping around for you."

    "So you can not judge the Nuggets until the LA series."

    So I guess I couldn't judge the Mavs till they played Nuggets as well, the first round doesn't count since Spurs didn't have a player

  4. #129
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    849
    During the timeout, the Mavs should've told the refs that they'll intentionally foul. THe loss should be blame on the Mavs coaching staff as much as the refs.

  5. #130
    We'll Be Back Spursfan092120's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    20,390
    During the timeout, the Mavs should've told the refs that they'll intentionally foul. THe loss should be blame on the Mavs coaching staff as much as the refs.
    Yeah..that's what the commentators were saying...you're SUPPOSED to do that. You have to let them know..otherwise, barely touching the guy, and then pulling your hands back like you didn't foul doesn't do it. And the Mavs know that. I don't think there was an intent to foul, to be honest with you. I think they were trying to play defense..they just didn't expect the 3.

  6. #131
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    960
    During the timeout, the Mavs should've told the refs that they'll intentionally foul. THe loss should be blame on the Mavs coaching staff as much as the refs.
    This is pretty common. Its hard to believe they didn't inform the refs. Has anyone heard from their staff anything indicating they did communicate it to the refs?

  7. #132
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173
    So people here are still trying to justify that it was Wright's up even after the league issued a statement admitting it was them that ed up? ok.

  8. #133
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    77,863
    So people here are still trying to justify that it was Wright's up even after the league issued a statement admitting it was them that ed up? ok.
    But this is the same league that messed up in the first place, how can one be sure they did not mess this up as well?

  9. #134
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    18,446
    Mavs are doneski

  10. #135
    Reppin' Timmy's homeland. VI_Massive's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    960
    So people here are still trying to justify that it was Wright's up even after the league issued a statement admitting it was them that ed up? ok.
    you don't want to be the ref who called a weak touch foul in a last second situation unless you know they're intentionally fouling. the mavs failed to communicate that to the refs and then wright sent mixed signals by fouling but raising his hands. he was raising them to make sure he didn't get a shooting foul called, i think, but still, it was a harder call then its being made out to be.

  11. #136
    Believe. Basketballgirl25's Avatar
    My Team
    New Jersey Nets
    Post Count
    1,620
    So people here are still trying to justify that it was Wright's up even after the league issued a statement admitting it was them that ed up? ok.
    sure the NBA admitted they messed up, but did Dallas say they informed the refs? I didn't hear them say that. Mistakes on both parts I think till I hear otherwise

  12. #137
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173
    sure the NBA admitted they messed up, but did Dallas say they informed the refs? I didn't hear them say that. Mistakes on both parts I think till I hear otherwise
    Did Wright foul Melo or not?

  13. #138
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    41,715
    Wright might have fouled 'melo, but he clearly didn't want to foul 'melo, or he wouldn't have put his hands up after he reached in. He made a snap decision that it was better to just stand back and watch the ball to see if it went in. Only after it went in did he turn to the officials to . Classic case by the Mavs of wanting their cake and eating it too. The NBA was stupid for issuing a statement that it was an intentional foul, when they have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not it was intentional, and the defender's body language says that it wasn't.

    I have to say that I love the irony of Mavericks fans whining that the officials robbed them by NOT calling one of their players for a foul.

  14. #139
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    Wright might have fouled 'melo, but he clearly didn't want to foul 'melo, or he wouldn't have put his hands up after he reached in. He made a snap decision that it was better to just stand back and watch the ball to see if it went in. Only after it went in did he turn to the officials to . Classic case by the Mavs of wanting their cake and eating it too. The NBA was stupid for issuing a statement that it was an intentional foul, when they have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not it was intentional, and the defender's body language says that it wasn't.

    I have to say that I love the irony of Mavericks fans whining that the officials robbed them by NOT calling one of their players for a foul.
    I am amazed at how consistently you exhibit Pavlovian responses to the following:





    Nice to know that the blue and green is still capable of making you take leave of your senses...and has unhindered access to the manic part of your psychological profile.

  15. #140
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    41,715
    I'm not amazed that you completely ignore all the facts I stated in favor of challenging my motivation for doing so. Yeah, I don't like the Mavericks. Their reaction to a loss by blaming something other than their sheer lack of clutchness - AGAIN - is the primary factor in my dislike of them.

    I keep waiting for an opportunity to give them props for losing like men. FYI, I'm still waiting.

  16. #141
    Murdering Prostitutes Findog's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    21,565
    I'm not amazed that you completely ignore all the facts I stated in favor of challenging my motivation for doing so.
    Your "facts" dispute Antoine Wright reaching in and hacking at Melo's arms. He should've played to the whistle and wrapped him up better, but in a game that featured 89 free throws, his actions cons uted a foul.

    Denver is a better team, would've won the series anyways, Jet missed a FT, Josh missed a FT, Dirk missed a shot at the end, etc. They can't blame the loss on that blown call. But it was a blown call, even though in your absurd telling, it wasn't and the league is throwing a sop to Cuban.

  17. #142
    I own Allanon mavs>spurs2's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    8,980
    Anyone want to help me murder Stern, pm me. We'll take one for the team

  18. #143
    One Bad Ass MoFo SouthTexasRancher's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    2,352
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/playof...ory?id=4155285

    Refs missed intentional foul, NBA admits
    Comment Email Print Share
    Associated Press

    DALLAS -- The NBA says officials were wrong when they didn't call an intentional foul on the Dallas Mavericks just before Denver's Carmelo Anthony made a game-winning 3-pointer.

    2009 NBA Playoffs

    Want an in-depth look at the Nuggets-Mavs series? Check out all the stats, analysis and opinion here:
    • Nuggets-Mavs page

    The Mavericks had the lead and a foul to give Saturday when Denver inbounded the ball trailing by two points with less than 8 seconds left. Antoine Wright was clearly trying to foul Anthony, and bumped him twice.

    But the whistle never blew and Anthony swished a 3-pointer from the corner with a second left that gave the Nuggets a 106-105 victory and a 3-0 series lead.

    In a statement released after the game, Joel Litvin, NBA president for league and basketball operations, said "the officials missed an intentional foul" committed by Wright on Anthony.


    Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press
    Whiny, crybabies aka 2006 ChUmps so we should not expect anything else but whines and tears!!!

  19. #144
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    41,715
    Your "facts" dispute Antoine Wright reaching in and hacking at Melo's arms.
    Not exactly, as I never said he didn't foul him. I said he didn't "intentionally" foul him, as is evident by his body language after he reached in with one hand for the ball and got 'melo across the wrist. But now that you mention it, I do dispute your characterization that he was "hacking at Melo's arms", as though he was whacking away at the guy while the official stood there refusing to call the foul. Carmelo flailed when Wright reached in, and the officials may have been reluctant to reward him with a call, particularly if it could possibly have resulted in three free throws at the end of a game like that.

    BTW, how was Wunderlich supposed to see Wright getting Anthony across the wrist when he was behind both players? All Wright had to do was put a hand on 'melo's waist and it's an immediate whistle. One would think an NBA player would understand how to commit a hand-check, but then again, one would think that his body language after reaching in said "I wasn't trying to foul him", one would think that a coach would tell the officials that they intended to foul shooters on the floor, and one would think Wright would have complained to the refs BEFORE the ball went in if he actually thought he should get the call.

  20. #145
    In Dirk We Trust sribb43's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,849
    I cant wait until the day we have the technology when refs are no longer needed

  21. #146
    Believe.
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Post Count
    306
    I'm sorry, but for anyone here who posts on www.dallas-mavs.com some people are stupid, ok one person. My friend is a Mavs fan and signed up that's how I read the posts, but anyway post by Tremaine

    "Yes, they are good, but also extremely lucky, and they still have not faced a team in the playoffs that is a true test.
    The Hornets were just a MASH unit and Josh Howard was limping around for you."

    "So you can not judge the Nuggets until the LA series."

    So I guess I couldn't judge the Mavs till they played Nuggets as well, the first round doesn't count since Spurs didn't have a player
    @ tremaine. this idiot is a nugget hater that goes around signing up on the team forums of whoever we are playing and just trashes the nuggets with complete and utter nonsense. he did it for the hornets, he did it for the mavs and if we advance you will see him at laker boards.

    and when we are eliminated he will be the first to celebrate and say 'i told you so!'

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •