You're just telling yourself that bro. Trust me, a Gold Medal is way more valuable than you're trying to make it seem. Especially since they on the USA.
No, it works both ways. When arguing about Manu Ginobili, Spurfan says he won 3 championships cause he's a winner.
When arguing about Kobe Bryant, Spurfan says three championships don't count because he rode Shaq's coattails and wasn't the best player on his team.
You're just telling yourself that bro. Trust me, a Gold Medal is way more valuable than you're trying to make it seem. Especially since they on the USA.
A player's fragility is part of the whole package.
Before and Now I'd rather have Manu on my team.
Manu needs 30 minutes and he can score 20 points. JJ needs 40 minutes to score 20 points. And JJ also needs to shoot the ball at least 5 times more than Manu.
So I go with Manu, and don't ask me why anymore.
I chose Manu because of his past accomplishments, but if we were talking about having one or the other now I would take Joe.
Do you remember that night when Manu dropped 48 on JJ ?
Or that other night were Manu had 24 straight points (40 in total) on JJ ?![]()
Again, I assumed that since we're in an "NBA" forum, we're talking about the NBA.
When talking about Andrew Bynum, yes.
When talking about Manu Ginobili, no.
Wow, two whole games.
He probably followed those games with a few 8 points on 15 shots performances.
Yup, Manu would be just as efficient as the main focus of his team as he is as the side kick who gets to play off a better player.
Manu at his 32 years has the same amount of injuries that Johnson at his 20 something, people are overrating Manu's "fragilness" 'cause he has been injured lately.
How did you calculate that?
He's frail, deal with it.
THat was just a sample
Knowing that Manu averages only 10 FG attemps per game in his entire career I really doubt he would regularly attemp 15 FG when he's having a bad shooting night.
You know this how? Do you have every box score of Manu's every game bookmarked?
You musta missed that Lakers Spurs series in 2008.
That's twice as much as JJ droping 40 on Manu.
So I guess since Amare has dropped 40+ on Duncan more than Duncan has dropped 40+ on Amare, Amare > Duncan.
Good point! I think you just killed that argument.
Of course Duncan helps players like Manu be better but it's not like Manu couldn't do what he does on another team. Heck look at Hedo. He didn't do much with the Spurs and playing next to Tim, but once he went to Orlando he had a career year.
I can't find the box-scores of that series. Can somebody post them?
Now they'll probably go back to the argument that says Robert Horry is better than Michael Jordan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)