San Antonio lands UFL team

[fyatuk]

It's of some relevance to the opponent.

Not really, the only thing that matters to them is whether they count as an opponent for qualifying for either bowls or FCS playoffs. They should count for both during the reclassification period, so it should be irrelevant whether they technically are FCS, FBS, or neither.

[Blake]

Not really, the only thing that matters to them is whether they count as an opponent for qualifying for either bowls or FCS playoffs. They should count for both during the reclassification period, so it should be irrelevant whether they technically are FCS, FBS, or neither.

them being K St?

if an FBS team plays 2 FCS teams in one season, they can only count 1 of the wins.

It hurt Kansas State last year that even though they went 6-6, two of the wins were against FCS teams and therefore were not bowl eligible.

It's also very rare for an FBS team to travel to an FCS field. I cant think of any time that it's happened.

During the reclassification in 2013, I am wondering if utsa will be considered FCS or will count as an FBS opponent. It may not be a huge factor for some, but it's still a factor.

[fyatuk]

them being K St?

if an FBS team plays 2 FCS teams in one season, they can only count 1 of the wins.

It hurt Kansas State last year that even though they went 6-6, two of the wins were against FCS teams and therefore were not bowl eligible.

It's also very rare for an FBS team to travel to an FCS field. I cant think of any time that it's happened.

During the reclassification in 2013, I am wondering if utsa will be considered FCS or will count as an FBS opponent. It may not be a huge factor for some, but it's still a factor.

Ahh, good point.

Let's see... according to this summary (http://www.athletics.txstate.edu/the...quirements.pdf) from Tx State...

During the 2 year classification, the first year they'd be considered FCS and the second FBS in terms of the one game FCS counting.

[lebomb]

Its NFL, Utsa FBS football or forget about it.........................

[fyatuk]

Its NFL, Utsa FBS football or forget about it.........................

Snob


As long as it's well executed football, I'm good.

[Buddy Holly]

Holy , can you guys appropriate the conversations please.

There's a UTSA forum where the back and forth can be had.

[Blake]

Holy , can you guys appropriate the conversations please.

There's a UTSA forum where the back and forth can be had.

what would you like to talk about?

[fyatuk]

Holy , can you guys appropriate the conversations please.

There's a UTSA forum where the back and forth can be had.

The conversation flowed. At least it didn't degenerate into a flame war.

[jb4g]

them being K St?

if an FBS team plays 2 FCS teams in one season, they can only count 1 of the wins.

It hurt Kansas State last year that even though they went 6-6, two of the wins were against FCS teams and therefore were not bowl eligible.

It's also very rare for an FBS team to travel to an FCS field. I cant think of any time that it's happened.

It doesnt happen because most of the conferences have a rule against it, their member schools can only play FCS opponents at home. In 2012 UTSA will still be classified FCS, so any games with FBS schools will have to be on the road.

2013 begins the reclass period, they will count as a win for FBS schools towards bowl eligibility. Most of the rumored contracts are home and home deals. Makes a ton of sense for a school like OKst or K-St to do so, its an easy win, get to play in front of TX recruits, and close enough that some of their fans will make the trip. Its going to mean a lot of losses for UTSA, but they arent eligible for the FCS playoffs in 2013 or 2014 anyways. On the plus side, bringing in schools of this quality will ensure they hit the 15k attendance number, putting them in prime position in 2015 to be full fledged FBS.

Of course this entire plan could backfire if the NCAA changes the rules/requirements when the moratorium (sp?) lifts.

[Buddy Holly]

what would you like to talk about?

Gee, I don't know, the topic of the thread.

[Blake]

Gee, I don't know, the topic of the thread.

great, discuss some more how San Antonio lands UFL team.

nobody is stopping you.

[fyatuk]

great, discuss some more how San Antonio lands UFL team.

nobody is stopping you.

Well, considering the topic is SA landing a UFL team, which has been confirmed by the UFL to not be true yet (expansion teams still undecided), the topic is kind of pointless.

[spursncowboys]

The conversation flowed. At least it didn't degenerate into a flame war.

regardless of all of buddy holly's troll worthy attempts

[Buddy Holly]

regardless of all of buddy holly's troll worthy attempts

Dude, seriously, how am I a troll when all I did was put you in check every time you decided to type out a post and make dumb claim after dumb claim.

Btw, do you remember these little nuggets?

7 NFL homes games.
100,000 attendance average in the NFL.
AT&T having 16,000 seats.

o, McFly, that was you.

To add to that, you calling people morons, etc and having no real foot to stand on in your attempts at arguing can only leave me to say you are the troll, you are the unintelligent lame troll. So you know, enjoy.

[Blake]

Dude, seriously, how am I a troll when all I did was put you in check every time you decided to type out a post and make dumb claim after dumb claim.

Btw, do you remember these little nuggets?

7 NFL homes games.
100,000 attendance average in the NFL.
AT&T having 16,000 seats.

o, McFly, that was you.

To add to that, you calling people morons, etc and having no real foot to stand on in your attempts at arguing can only leave me to say you are the troll, you are the unintelligent lame troll. So you know, enjoy.

Holy , can you guys appropriate the conversations please.

There's a UTSA forum where the back and forth can be had.

[Buddy Holly]

Where in that top post quote did I mention UTSA? Oh yeah, nowhere.

[Blake]

Where in that top post quote did I mention UTSA? Oh yeah, nowhere.

Where in that top post did you mention the UFL? Oh yeah, nowhere.

Just stfu, idiot.

[spursncowboys]

Dude, seriously, how am I a troll when all I did was put you in check every time you decided to type out a post and make dumb claim after dumb claim.

Btw, do you remember these little nuggets?

7 NFL homes games.
100,000 attendance average in the NFL.
AT&T having 16,000 seats.

o, McFly, that was you.

To add to that, you calling people morons, etc and having no real foot to stand on in your attempts at arguing can only leave me to say you are the troll, you are the unintelligent lame troll. So you know, enjoy.

YOu put me in check??
You argue nonsense. McFly??? really. You couldn't get a catchphrase from the 00's or even the 90's? Had to dip back into the 80's for that little nugget?
Incredible. I put 7 instead of 8. 16k seats instead of 19. That is so incredibly lame of you to point out that and focus on only that then to not have any real take on anything. I would have to conclude that you are a professional troll who chooses this forum to be your only social outlet.

[spursncowboys]

I rather read about UTSA than your anti social rants toward everyone's posts.

[Buddy Holly]

I rather read about UTSA than your anti social rants toward everyone's posts.

Anti-social rants?

Did you pluck that out of some book? Was it the 'Idiots Guide on Questionable or Just Made Up to Sound Smart Put Downs One Can Use on a Message Board.'

[Buddy Holly]

YOu put me in check??

Pretty much.

You argue nonsense.

Please child, articulate for just how my responses to you were nonsense.

McFly??? really. You couldn't get a catchphrase from the 00's or even the 90's?

"Dumbass" - Red Foreman
"Holy you're stupid" - Me in response to you just now circa 2010

Had to dip back into the 80's for that little nugget?

Still sperm in your pap's ball sack, huh?

Incredible. I put 7 instead of 8. 16k seats instead of 19. That is so incredibly lame of you to point out that and focus on only that then to not have any real take on anything.

Yeah, pointing out such usual mistakes from someone who is trying to be an expert in an argument is totally lame. I mean, it's just so uncalled for. Most experts usually get their information wrong which is why they're experts, huh?

Seriously, with that type of mental digestion you have going on, you should be a sports radio host or something.

I would have to conclude that you are a professional troll who chooses this forum to be your only social outlet.

Jesus, I've been on this site since pretty much the beginning, I was on the other site when everyone was coolio with one another, kid, you see the little Carver icon I have under my name? If I'm some troll, I wouldn't have that. But honestly, I feel stupid for trying to prove how I'm not a troll and it's just plain embarrassing that I continue to keep going back and forth such a mental re that you are.

Morgan's Wonderland is set to open soon, have a blast.

P.S.

I average 3.3 posts a day. You average 7.5 posts a day.

[symple19]

Ummm, this is the NFL forum, not the forum for a league filled with wannabes and has-beens. This bull should be in the "other sports" forum. Nobody GAF about indoor, gimmicky football

[Buddy Holly]

Ummm, this is the NFL forum, not the forum for a league filled with wannabes and has-beens. This bull should be in the "other sports" forum. Nobody GAF about indoor, gimmicky football

Since when was football considered a "other sport"? Also, UFL isn't indoors.

[symple19]

Since when was football considered a "other sport"? Also, UFL isn't indoors.

What's the name of the forum dude?

Sorry if I'm not up to date on worthless leagues

[Buddy Holly]

What's the name of the forum dude?

Find me a UFL sub-forum on Spurstalk and I'll post it in there.

Sorry if I'm not up to date on worthless leagues