Kobe did'nt win MVP because his team could'nt even crack 50 wins. It has nothing to do with his Colorado incident, be serious for a minute. Nash won because he made his teammates better and had the best record to boot. The following year proved his worth as the Suns replicated their success despite missing Amare Stoudemire. Lebron and Wade finished higher than Kobe those years not because of the "colorado incident" but due to their better understanding the winning perspective of the game, which is more than scoring. The definition of MVP was not to put the most points in a single season.
The MVP profile has'nt changed eversince, the notion that "scorers" always have an advantage is an absolute fallacy. The past 10 winners shows that only 3 real scorers have won it. Duncan, Nash and Garnett won the rest. Guess what, none of those are scorers rather they bring a well put together dimensions of their game. Its no coincident when Kobe won his 1st MVP in 2008, it was'nt because he was scoring a lot more than his 2 previous seasons but rather he finally accepted the concept that sometimes less is more.



Reply With Quote

