Thor

[koriwhat]

Thinking about catching this today. 3D worth it or should I stick to 2D?

bootleg it cause it's not worth the dime.

here, let me sum it up for you... dude is a head and his father banishes him to earth with no powers, from there the movie gets real boring and it's a bunch of bs like, "wow, his name is thor?", "wow, he speaks weird.", "wow, he's not from here? weird", "wow...wow...wow..." and then boom everyone dies. ok, the end isn't like that.

this movie was lame. plus they added that no-body-having- ty-actress portman in it to boot.

[MannyIsGod]

You missed the point. Out of all of the villains and untapped fictional potential that Marvel possesses, they go with a robot that shoots out of his face.

And to all the Spider-Man haters there's only two movies that had greater character development and overall plot, and that's Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.

Most other Marvel movies are just what they are intended to be, entertainment. Albeit, a lot of them turn out to be quite ty, but entertainment nonetheless.

You suck at this.

Here's a hint: He doesn't get the crown without his hammer.




Where did I state that I thought the robot was the villain? Your fail assumptions are making you look like a re , not saying that you aren't one to begin with.

Thor fighting Loki was more of a conclusion, given the fact that Thor obtained his hammer and is therefor 'invincible'.

It's clear now why you enjoyed Thor so much.

I don't know why I expect you to understand a simple movie when you can't even keep your own thoughts in order.

SMH.

[MannyIsGod]

Viking Quest > Character development > hammer quest.

FYP

[Kermit]

you suck at this.

Here's a hint: He doesn't get the crown without his hammer.




Where did i state that i thought the robot was the villain? Your fail assumptions are making you look like a re , not saying that you aren't one to begin with.

Thor fighting loki was more of a conclusion, given the fact that thor obtained his hammer and is therefor 'invincible'.

It's clear now why you enjoyed thor so much.

wtf?

[scampers]

You suck at this.

Here's a hint: He doesn't get the crown without his hammer.




Where did I state that I thought the robot was the villain? Your fail assumptions are making you look like a re , not saying that you aren't one to begin with.

Thor fighting Loki was more of a conclusion, given the fact that Thor obtained his hammer and is therefor 'invincible'.

It's clear now why you enjoyed Thor so much.

Gotta admit man, you're failing hard at this. Better stop while you still can.

[JoeChalupa]

DAmn, this movie sounds deep.

[redzero]

The movie isn't that complicated. There's just an argument about when the climax was.

[JoeChalupa]

The movie isn't that complicated. There's just an argument about when the climax was.

Humm..sounds orgasmic.

[MannyIsGod]

The movie isn't that complicated. There's just an argument about when the climax was.

Not really an argument. There's pretty much only one idiot in this thread. Everyone else figured out who the villain was, what the point of the movie was, and when it climaxed.

[benefactor]

Just got back. Solid summer popcorn flick. Good visuals and the acting was surprisingly uncheesy.

[lefty]

Ok not bad

Not BB or TDKesque, but not bad

I thought Chris H. did a good job as Thor

And Natalie Portman is yummy

And there was a Hawkeye cameo!!!!!


I didnt stay to see if there was am easter egg after the credits though....

[v2freak]

Not really an argument. There's pretty much only one idiot in this thread. Everyone else figured out who the villain was, what the point of the movie was, and when it climaxed.

Actually yeah, you're getting real puffy over a comic book movie.

[Technique]

Not really an argument. There's pretty much only one idiot in this thread. Everyone else figured out who the villain was, what the point of the movie was, and when it climaxed.

Actually, the robot is linked to the villian, making him subject to the category.

I'm glad you think this movie has a point other than making Chris Hemsworth a millionare.

You have yet to provide a solid case against the climax being when Thor acquired the hammer, in turn; saving his friends and his human counterpart (most important people to him), becoming invincible (a god) and therefor returning to his rightful heir.

There really is nothing you can say to disprove this, other than saying hurrrp durrp climax is when he fought loki da evil guy!!! hurrrr

Anyway, you swayed off point, I feel the need to repeat my original statement. This time it will be re proof.

giant metal robot shooting fire out of face = not creative, boring

character development = fails. what other decent movie has the viewers siding on the villains side for justifiable reasons?

getting slapped = not deserving of hammer. he never accomplished anything to earn the hammer.

Thor is in the same category as Batman. I find Jack Nicholson's Joker more intimidating than Loki.

[Reggie Williams]

You suck at this.

Here's a hint: He doesn't get the crown without his hammer.




Where did I state that I thought the robot was the villain? Your fail assumptions are making you look like a re , not saying that you aren't one to begin with.

Thor fighting Loki was more of a conclusion, given the fact that Thor obtained his hammer and is therefor 'invincible'.

It's clear now why you enjoyed Thor so much.

lmao rofl


you are amazing at deciphering movies and understanding them

A+

[ManuBalboa]

Actually, the robot is linked to the villian, making him subject to the category.

I'm glad you think this movie has a point other than making Chris Hemsworth a millionare.

You have yet to provide a solid case against the climax being when Thor acquired the hammer, in turn; saving his friends and his human counterpart (most important people to him), becoming invincible (a god) and therefor returning to his rightful heir.

There really is nothing you can say to disprove this, other than saying hurrrp durrp climax is when he fought loki da evil guy!!! hurrrr

Anyway, you swayed off point, I feel the need to repeat my original statement. This time it will be re proof.

giant metal robot shooting fire out of face = not creative, boring

character development = fails. what other decent movie has the viewers siding on the villains side for justifiable reasons?

getting slapped = not deserving of hammer. he never accomplished anything to earn the hammer.

Thor is in the same category as Batman. I find Jack Nicholson's Joker more intimidating than Loki.

lol strong movie comprehension fail

[leemajors]

Actually, the robot is linked to the villian, making him subject to the category.

I'm glad you think this movie has a point other than making Chris Hemsworth a millionare.

You have yet to provide a solid case against the climax being when Thor acquired the hammer, in turn; saving his friends and his human counterpart (most important people to him), becoming invincible (a god) and therefor returning to his rightful heir.

There really is nothing you can say to disprove this, other than saying hurrrp durrp climax is when he fought loki da evil guy!!! hurrrr

Anyway, you swayed off point, I feel the need to repeat my original statement. This time it will be re proof.

giant metal robot shooting fire out of face = not creative, boring

character development = fails. what other decent movie has the viewers siding on the villains side for justifiable reasons?

getting slapped = not deserving of hammer. he never accomplished anything to earn the hammer.

Thor is in the same category as Batman. I find Jack Nicholson's Joker more intimidating than Loki.

You'd fare much better if you bothered to state or knew what dénouement is, it may have salvaged your argument to make it understandable. Without it you're just spouting bile.

[Trainwreck2100]

Actually, the robot is linked to the villian, making him subject to the category.

I'm glad you think this movie has a point other than making Chris Hemsworth a millionare.

You have yet to provide a solid case against the climax being when Thor acquired the hammer, in turn; saving his friends and his human counterpart (most important people to him), becoming invincible (a god) and therefor returning to his rightful heir.

There really is nothing you can say to disprove this, other than saying hurrrp durrp climax is when he fought loki da evil guy!!! hurrrr

Anyway, you swayed off point, I feel the need to repeat my original statement. This time it will be re proof.

giant metal robot shooting fire out of face = not creative, boring

character development = fails. what other decent movie has the viewers siding on the villains side for justifiable reasons?



Thor is in the same category as Batman. I find Jack Nicholson's Joker more intimidating than Loki.

The Climax is when he destroys the bridge

getting slapped = not deserving of hammer. he never accomplished anything to earn the hammer.

there's really no way to reply to this

The only argument I'll grant you is people siding with Loki, but that's cause it was one of the best comic book villain performances ever.

[Technique]

The Climax is when he destroys the bridge


there's really no way to reply to this

The only argument I'll grant you is people siding with Loki, but that's cause it was one of the best comic book villain performances ever.

Odin stated that one must be worthy of the hammer to wield it. What did he do throughout the movie as a human that was so worthy?

Jack Nicholson's Joker > Loki

[Reggie Williams]

Odin stated that one must be worthy of the hammer to wield it. What did he do throughout the movie as a human that was so worthy?

Jack Nicholson's Joker > Loki

Hint: It has something to do with Hubris.

[TDMVPDPOY]

but is there any superhero with a villian that could go toe to toe with the superhero?

cause it seems like one sided when plot device comes in for hero to secure the win...

[TDMVPDPOY]

but is there any superhero with a villian that could go toe to toe with the superhero?

cause it seems like one sided when plot device comes in for hero to secure the win...

[Reggie Williams]

Omega Red and Wolverine

[JoeChalupa]

So would I still enjoy this movie not knowing a damn thing about the comic book characters? I admit that I don't really analyze every movie I see and just simply watch them for entertainment purposes. I sometimes need to have them explained to me but in the end I just say "meh". My niece said she liked it though and never read the comics so I'll probaly redbox this.

[MannyIsGod]

Odin stated that one must be worthy of the hammer to wield it. What did he do throughout the movie as a human that was so worthy?

Jack Nicholson's Joker > Loki

Did you even watch the movie?

[TheMACHINE]

just saw the movie last night...i put it up there with Daredevil. lol