Kennedy Assassination

[ChumpDumper]

Another quote from a Dallas doctor after several conflicting statements over the years:

I don't think any of us got a good look at the head wound. I didn't examine it or really look at it carefully.

Same guy, two years later:

[n]o one, except Dr. Kemp Clark, carefully examined the head wound.

http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp....cclelland.html

So, here's what Dallas doctor Kemp Clark had to say about the wound on November 22, 1963:

A missile had gone in or out of the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue.

And:

The head wound could have been either the exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangential wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/press.htm


I'll wait for your direct quotes from multiple Dallas doctors insisting the head shot had to be from the front.

[ChumpDumper]

Now, I've seen that McClelland declared that it has to be a frontal shot, but only after watching the Zapruder film. His actual witnessing of the wound did not determine anything.

When folks talk about which way JFK's head jerked, I have to ask them how many head shots with high powered rifles have they witnessed in their lives.

[ChumpDumper]

Anyhoo, I went ahead and found this handy closeup of JFK's head going forward after the hit.

Of course, it's graphic.

http://users.skynet.be/mar/Headshot/...up_312-313.gif

[lefty]

[ChumpDumper]

And the other Dallas doctor who supports a conspiracy is the one who sold a book calling the JFK assassination a conspiracy, Charles Crenshaw. The book is as full of as any other conspiracy book. Crenshaw can't even get his recollection of that morning's paper right.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/crenshaw.htm

So, at best, two Dallas doctors think the autopsy is bogus. The rest, including the one they say examined the wound most closely, don't.

Is that accurate, SA210?

[SA210]

[ChumpDumper]

lol SA210 is a full blown conspiracy nut