Reply With Quote
I can see why Goran was POTM debating the topic at hand is a natural gift
Your Suns comment was re ed. Cully loving Rondo has nothing to do with the Suns. He's just incredibly stupid and thinks the 3 Rondo made when the game was already over is something that makes him a winner.
You were trying to qualify the re ed opinion of someone just because he's a Lakers fan and it's stupid when Lakers fans do that. Cobbler is the king of it.
I can see why Goran was POTM debating the topic at hand is a natural gift
There's nothing to debate. Cully's logic is re ed.
If the average troll had the stupid opinions of Dale, people would dismiss them as too obvious.
There are actually people who are this re ed. Killakobe, there is no shame is in disagreeing with somebody who thinks that hitting a meaningless 3-pointer after doing jack , makes a player a winner.
It'd been awhile since he tagged you on it. His restraint is minimal.
No, I was not. I said I disagreed with Cully. I said Rondo is not a proven winner and I think he is overrated. Cully admitted he does enjoy that fact never said that is WHY he was debating Red. Since u are a fan of my previous work why not read the ones in this thread and get back 2 me? Never defended. Cully here
Reading is fundamental
^"prevail" came into sharp focus when Perkins went out at the top of Game 6. It was possible after that. Within our pervue, our control and we knew it, from Jackson, to Kobe and on down. We could handle Wallace, and we left Allen in the bed he'd crapped.
To this day I still can't believe A.) that Perkins went down like that. & B.) that Perkins stayed down when he came out in his civvies for Game 7.
I felt like a gigantic weight had lifted from my shoulders.
And Rondo crapping the bed for Game 7 made it even better. He deserves a ring for letting his team give up a double digit lead like that.
Oh, dem grapes is sour.
On a related note, Rondo owning media sensation Jeremy Lin
Fixed for Dale.
^lmcontrollinao!!!
Like I said, Rondo is a winner.
How is Rondo a winner?
Asked & answered.
How does hitting a 3-pointer in a losing effort after doing jack make somebody a winner? And how is that better than carrying a team to a championship?
Asked & answered.
Where did you answer that? I know that you made those claims, but you didn't explain why you thought that way.
He means
If that was true, then Dale would believe that Wade is a winner, too, but he doesn't believe that to necessarily be the case.
This is what Dale believes:
-Although Wade carried his team to a le, he has to win another to become a winner.
-Rondo won a le as the fourth most important player on the 2008 le team, but he's a winner because he hit a 3-pointer in Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals (a game in which his team lost, by the way) after his team already collapsed and the damage was done.
A logical human being would wonder how that makes any sense, but Dale has refused to explain this idiocy.
I'd consider him 5th most important to the 2008 Celtics, James Posey was more important to that team
Eddie House may have had more important plays, too, tbh..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
