..does Obama deserve 4 more years?

[mouse]

Romney isn't an ideologue. He's not going to pass landmark legislation that either significantly reduces or expands the size and scope of government. He's a placeholder, but one that won't at least push an extreme agenda.

Can't say the same for Obama.

^ vato has a point.

[mouse]

Obama is NOT a socialist... he's just as much of a corporatist shill as Mittens... loves the Fed and special interests...

great point.

[Clipper Nation]

Romney isn't an ideologue. He's not going to pass landmark legislation that either significantly reduces or expands the size and scope of government. He's a placeholder, but one that won't at least push an extreme agenda.

Can't say the same for Obama.

Oh please, you can't possibly believe that... the same lobbyists, corporations, and banks will push the exact same agenda regardless of whether it's Romney or Obama... the only difference is that it will be spun as "national security" under Romney or "humanitarian reasons" under Obama...

[boutons_deux]

"but one that won't at least push an extreme agenda."

repealing ACA, privatizing (destroying) SS by handing it to the Banksters,

killing medicare/medicaid with "here's a laughalble voucher, by your own catastrophe insurance in a "free, compe ive market" "

are all disruptively, pro-1% actions which will very likely occur (it's the Repug agenda) if Gecko wins with both houses in his majority favor.

[DMX7]

Romney isn't an ideologue. He's not going to pass landmark legislation that either significantly reduces or expands the size and scope of government. He's a placeholder, but one that won't at least push an extreme agenda.

Can't say the same for Obama.

The extremes will push it on him and of course he'll cave because he'll do anything to get elected.

[boutons_deux]

he won't have to cave, he's gladly, wilingly sign any Repug legislation that lands on his desk, just like dubya.