Reply With Quote
True that... Barry would be reduced to tears on the economy and Willard would be completely ethered on healthcare, tbh....
but let's face it. Dr. Ron Paul would have handed both The Fake and The Bum their asses
True that... Barry would be reduced to tears on the economy and Willard would be completely ethered on healthcare, tbh....
You did single me out, jack. Did you forget this post?
Looks like you've been insecure and projecting way before I was
In your black and white world, I'm sure I do. In that world you probably don't have sexual fantasies with little children either.
Ron Bless.
tbh, as soon as Ron says he's killing Medicare and everyone should fend for themselves, he lost the election right there.
thinking Paul had a chance. The whole show has been prearranged Obamney were selected months ago. he was just allowed to speak the truth which is a big step in the right direction.
and
newsflash, Paul is a Cons utionalist Libertarian. It's not in the Cons ution its not supposed to be there. You want it there, amend the Cons ution through the proper channels.
Uh? The Cons ution delegates law making to Congress. Medicare/Medicaid are government programs created by law.
I'm pretty sure Ron Paul himself would have a a good laugh after reading that.
the same Congress that also passed the NDAA and many, many other uncons utional laws? And the soon coming SOPA clonewake up
Ron Paul after reading your assumption that everything Congress passes is Cons utional:
the same Congress that also passed the NDAA and many, many other uncons utional laws? And the soon coming SOPA clone
Ron Paul after reading your assumption that everything Congress passes is Cons utional:
What's uncons utional about Medicare, counselor?
And if Ron Paul thinks a lot of these laws are uncons utional, he could get down from the soapbox and challenge them in court.
It's not like no law has ever been found uncons utional.
Son of a gun, I did single you out and still your insecurities came flowing out. I dont think you understand what projecting means. I will give you the definition. To ascribe one's own feelings, thoughts, or at udes to others. Again, I said Romney won this debate and you projected your silliness by saying "When certain small events (ie: Florida ruling, last night debate) give you a glimmer of hope to turn the main event (mandate, election) around, it really makes your partisan side shine." I expect chump to say and do anything to troll anyone he disagrees with on this site because of the pain he holds on to throughout his life, which in a few months I will continue my quest to help him but you I held to a higher standard for some reason. The fact is that last comment you made is classless. That's about you, brother. That's another projection you made or I should say you stole from someone else. Brother, I'll pray for you. God blessYou did single me out, jack. Did you forget this post?
Looks like you've been insecure and projecting way before I was
In your black and white world, I'm sure I do. In that world you probably don't have sexual fantasies with little children either.
Ron Bless.
And when he mentions pro bono care, more patient choice, and the fact that he himself was a ing doctor who ran a successful medical practice, he wins it right back, tbh....
That makes no sense
When you call somebody out and that person comes right back at you, it's the exact opposite of insecurity.
Insecure is having somebody so far up your ass you can't stop thinking about them.
Projecting would be me trying to convince other people that Romney won the debate since that's how I voted. Swing and miss again, jack.
Me saying "When certain small events (ie: Florida ruling, last night debate) give you a glimmer of hope to turn the main event (mandate, election) around, it really makes your partisan side shine." is simply my opinion developed by the actual events described between parenthesis. Feel free to disagree.
Well, that's true. I take that back.
Ron bless.
Ron Paul would have destroyed Obamney in the first 10 minutes of the debate by pointing out the obvious which is Obama and Romney are the same.
I give you 2 hints: individual mandate
"ron paul wants to kill medicare cause he's mean and hates old ppl"
"Obama is a bum and definitely handed the election lead to Romney"
typical fantasy from Randian Paul sucker
Gecko now has even LESS probability of winning electoral college.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes...r/nate-silver/
MSM pimping the election by and pandering for political ad $$$ by talking only about the "close" popular vote, as if the popular vote counted.
Brother, i can't continue to go back and forth like this. Its unproductive and childish. God blessThat makes no sense
When you call somebody out and that person comes right back at you, it's the exact opposite of insecurity.
Insecure is having somebody so far up your ass you can't stop thinking about them.
Projecting would be me trying to convince other people that Romney won the debate since that's how I voted. Swing and miss again, jack.
Me saying "When certain small events (ie: Florida ruling, last night debate) give you a glimmer of hope to turn the main event (mandate, election) around, it really makes your partisan side shine." is simply my opinion developed by the actual events described between parenthesis. Feel free to disagree.
Well, that's true. I take that back.
Ron bless.
I'm sorry but
boutons, the first article on the page is Silver making it clear we can't gauge the debate impact yet. I don't think the debate made much of an impact because they never do, but one thing the debate DIDN'T do was help Obama.
One thing it didn't do was win Gecko any electoral votes.
As many commented before the debate, the debates very rarely have any effect the voting, AND most in bents usually lose the first debate, as Maddow showed going back to 1976.
Barry was clearly flummoxed by Gecko flip-flopping, aka lying, towards the center on nearly everything he and Ryan have been pushing for years. Now Gecko says he's was WRONG (for being caught) in his 47% speech.
Sports Authority = JOBS; Dominoes Pizza = JOBS; Staples = JOBS; Steel Dynamics, Inc. = JOBS; Burger King = JOBS; Sealy Corporation = JOBS; The Weather Channel = JOBS; Brookstone = JOBS; Burlington Coat Factory = JOBS; Dunkin' Donuts = JOBS; D&M Holdings = JOBS; Houghton Mifflin = JOBS; Clear Channel Communications = JOBS; Gymboree = JOBS; Hospital Corporation of America = JOBS; Guitar Center = JOBS; and on and on and on. Bain Capital has a better record on wealth generation and job creation than the Obama administration.
Did some of the Bain ventures fail? Yep. It happens. But the fact remains, if Bain Capital were costing more jobs than it was creating, it wouldn't be as successful a venture capitalist company as it is.
Bain sucks wealth out of takeover victims. Creating jobs is not Bain's priority, never was, never will. The priority is making money for Bain's investors.
House Repugs have blocked the Dem job creation/stimulus bills.
GFY
and severe tax cuts under dubya didn't create jobs, NEVER do, but dubya
PUBLIC JOB CREATION did work
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-09-2012 at 09:22 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
