Reply With Quote
LOL...
At 2:19 in part 5, they show microwave frequency tropospheric scatter (radio communications) as they talk about weaponizing...
Another BS moment!
LOL...
Half way through part 3... They think they created an earthquake...
LOL...
This was in "The Ring of Fire." It isn't uncommon to have magnitude 5 earthquakes here.
Then the end of part 3...
If HAARP is used with Chemtrails....
Ridiculous... This conspiracy theory cannot be so. From what they say, the chemtrails would disappear almost instantly when HAARP was turned on.
LOL...
At 2:19 in part 5, they show microwave frequency tropospheric scatter (radio communications) as they talk about weaponizing...
Another BS moment!
Well then what is the difference when the history channel talks about man evolving from an ape? I love your double standards.
When it comes to age of earth or evolution no one questions what channel it was on and no one questions the outrageous theories.
You guys eat that up with a spoon. Now all of a sudden it's a show about something your not familiar with and it's now bogus the channel has alternative motives and the scientists are flakes?
Face it the bottom line is no one outside the top secret facility really knows what HAARP agendas really are and what they can do or try and disrupt with this technology.
That is why I am just posting links to show others don't agree with you i never claimed to be a HAARP expert. unlike Agloco I know when to admit my limitations.
That is why I stick with subjects I have researched thoroughly and thus you all have no choice but to cave when trying to debate me on the issues I am well suited to educate you on.
Last edited by mouse; 11-04-2012 at 08:42 PM.
What double standard. Please post where I say we evolved from apes. How many times have I mentioned Intelligent Design in such similar conversations?
It isn't as outrageous, and i know they are only the best agreed upon theories. Where have I indicated such things are factual by age? Now i agree the earth is very, very old. Far older than you say, but I will not attempt to pinpoint an age.
On the contrary. I studied electronics since 1970. I had a career in Microwave Communications Systems until 1992. I understand this stuff.
Well, I agree there is some top secret possibilities, but just the same. You should expect the types of responses from people like me when you post stuff that is such blatant lies. This is another unfounded conspiracy theory you are believing in. HAARP simply doesn't have the power to do as you and others are claiming.
You can post all the links you want. I have actually been watching the YouTubes because I find it fascinating how people can be so ignorant, or lie so much about the sciences.
Researched? With the opinion that all you find on the internet is true?
Why are you linking that again?
LOL...
I went to The History Channel web site to find what they say about that video. They must have pulled it. Must be a big embarrassment for them Will you do me a favor and find reference to it at their web site please.
Here's one for you:
Your link came from the same series. The series is called "That's Impossible."
Here's a far cleaner video of the one you posted twice:
The HD version is quite clear. Jumped through it to certain points.
HAARP does not send ELF! They can't get the simple science aspects correct. They send modulated HF into the auroral electrojet. There is a newer, more effective method known as geometric modulation. With both ways, the ELF waves are generated in the aurora. It can be done less effectively in the ionosphere like "The Russian Woodpecker" probably did for their subs. Regardless, the antenna array is incapable of those frequencies. The antenna array is more like an intermediate frequency circuit, if you understand radio design. You may wish to challenge my understanding of this. Have at it. I was taught the theories about how Airborne Command Post talks to nuclear subs, and land based systems too when I was in the nuclear theater. Here is what wiki says about one aspect. Keep the 2.5 miles in perspective:
wiki: Operation Looking Glass
If the USSTRATCOM GOC is unable to function in its role, the E-6B TACAMO can assume command of all U.S. nuclear forces. Flying aboard each ABNCP is a crew of 22, which includes an aircrew, an Information Systems Officer and team, an Airborne Emergency Action Officer (an Admiral or General officer), an Intelligence Officer, Meteorologist, and an Airborne Battle Operations Team. In addition to being able to launch ICBMs, the E-6B can communicate Emergency Action Messages (EAM) to nuclear submarines running at depth by extending a 2½-mile-long trailing wire antenna (TWA) for use with the Survivable Low Frequency Communications System (SLFCS).
Last edited by Wild Cobra; 11-05-2012 at 06:58 AM.
I feel the History channel did a great injustice not having you on their show.
What do you expect when a "History" channel is diving into "Science?"
Maybe if I knew more about Civil Engineering, I could change your mind about 9/11 too?
You could be the GOD Civil Engineering and couldn't change my mind on what my eyes saw.
You saw someone plant explosives?
Maybe you should testify to the authorities!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
