Reply With Quote
And none if you have any justification for that belief.
Woo you can't win.. you're talking to a naive idiot
And none if you have any justification for that belief.
lol this thread is a perfect example of the mental gymnastics religious nutters do to "feel better" about existence
Red Cross is corrupt as
A naive idiot is someone who really believes that after years and years of forging any belief that some obvious internet moron is going to change anyones mind about anything.
You ever seen it done, me either. Don't forgret the billions who agree with me.
Its not even that. Valid points are raised and you just disregard them because you cannot answer them
There are no...valid points...when it comes to this topic. This is about faith not facts. Only a fool tries to deal in logic/facts when talking religion. That should be obvious.
Funniest joke of the thread..... yeah, there's so many geniuses and millionaires in your trailer park....
Constantly appealing to popularity doesn't change the lack of proof that your god exists compared to all the scientific proof of evolution.... ultimately, all you do is commit logical fallacy after logical fallacy to distract from the fact that you have no actual, meaningful proof on your side, tbh....
No, there are absolutely valid points. Just because you don't want to think logically doesn't mean that logic has no place in a discussion about religion. In the end, it's about belief. And one either has belief for a good reason or for a bad reason. That's true on every matter. Believing because other people believe, is not a good reason. Believing because your belief hasn't been proven wrong yet, is not a good reason. The best way to get to the truth will always be rational thinking, no matter the subject.
The fact that you don't care about being rational shows that you don't care about the truth. And that's fine. If you want to delude yourself, go on ahead. Don't, however, claim that others are wrong for thinking rationally just because you can't.
Bible verses, the Moody Bible Ins ute, and a Jeebo neoconservative shill in D'Souza.... wow, those are some real unbiased sources(1) Romans 1:19-21
(2) Jeremiah 29:13-14
(4) The Wonders of God's Creation, Moody Ins ute of Science (Chicago, IL)
(11) Dinesh D'Souza, What's So Great about Christianity; (Regnery Publishing, Inc, 2007, chapter 11).
(14) John 8:12
(15) John 14:6
(16) John 14:11
(17) Jeremiah 31:3
(18) John 3:16
(10) Revelation 3:20
(20) John 10:27-29
Not to mention, a cursory glance around EveryStudent.com reveals that the whole website is just a bunch of Jeebo talking points about God and the Bible....
Try again, dumbass...
So far, your only "sources" are the Bible, Bible ins utes, and Christianity-focused speakers/writers, and those sites are full of the same logical fallacies and biases that your own lame arguments contain..... still haven't seen anything that adequately counters the obvious scientific proof of evolution as opposed to creation....He is a regular contributor to several Christian publications, is in wide demand as a speaker at conferences, and is the author of over 67 books including:
Handbook of Christian Apologetics
Christianity for Modern Pagans
Fundamentals of the Faith
1.) Argument from ignorance.
2.) Argument from ignorance.
3.) God of the gaps.
4.) Argument from ignorance.
5.) Complete bull , because God would actually try to convince us that he exists instead of the "I'll just leave you a sign or have my followers talk to you" bull that theists claim he does. If God was all powerful and truly wanted us to believe, then he is a colossal failure.
6.) Anthropomorphism and completely irrelevant.
It's no surprise that Avante actually find these to be compelling arguments.
First cause bull , intelligent design bull , objective morality indepent of human beings bull , anecdote bull , and bull about a man coming back to life after being dead for three days.
:yawn: You aren't a Christian, but you sure like regurgitating arguments from Christians.
Avante's not even reading the articles that he's Googling.
And
Written by Dr Andrew Corbett, President of ICI Theological College Australia, and author of the popular commentary on the Book of Revelation- The Most Embarrassing Book In The BibleYou do realize this is the equivalent of using Marlboro ads and Philip Morris-funded studies as "proof" that smoking isn't bad for you, right?Charles E. Rice. "Can we prove that God exists?" Chapter 3 in Truth in Christ: Notes on Teaching Some Elements of the Catholic Faith (Notre Dame, Indiana: Cashel Ins ute, 1983), 4-6.
And it goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
So I have a choice, I can go with the reading there or the reading here, hmmmmm?..that's a tough one.
Let's have some more.
You do realize this one is making fun of Jeebo s such as yourself, right? Richard Dawkins is an atheist and an evolutionary biologist, and the other part is from an atheist site called "GodlessGeeks"
This guy is a Christian author....BOB DUTKO is a leading voice today in the fearless defense of Christian truth, using logic, reason, science, history and factual evidence to disarm the critics and equip believers. Bob hosts the nationally syndicated talk show “Defending the Truth with Bob Dutko”, heard on radio stations nationwide. In addition, he hosts “The Bob Dutko Show”, Detroit's #1 Christian Talk Radio Show, heard daily from Noon—4:00 PM on 50,000 watt 103.5 FM - WMUZ. Bob is also the former National Press Secretary for Christian Coalition of America.
With 50 years devoted to the conceptual integration of medicine, neuroscience, psychology, physics and theology, Glenn Dudley is uniquely qualified to resolve the historical paradox of mind and body.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
